and some think that looking back at the tory's suggests they are the ones who do not know squat and then QED everything is wrapped up in a neat little box securely sealed with decorative ribbons. ROFLMFO.
Well, I was only kidding about the ark of the covenant bringing a freak storm to lolipalooza on the place Obama gave his acceptance speech but had it been a record high it would have been more evidence of global warming. ROFLMFO. SETI had some quick tests it could use to check suspicious positives, the climate people do not seem to have or want those tests.
Unfortunately I'm not sure what hoax even means- the complete video is a hoax or the editing was so bad it created a hoax from true facts? ROFLMFO.
I'm glad there are no ninevites here. ROFLMFO. All praise the tampons. Funny the yahoos eliminated ekonprophet.
That is what the CIA is supposed to do, hand out credentials to boost self esteem. Maybe Beau Biden died because the CIA forgot to make doctors and "Scientists" with even more self-esteem. All praise the tampons.
Many days ago one site that came up on the gxxg news page claimed the videos were obvious hoaxes and just assumed that was the case. I thought I saw one story that the whitehouse made a similar claim. Context is one thing, the question remains now if "hoax" is being used like the soviet idea of "mental illness" to try to use sociophilism to respond to your opponents' data. This is the typical liberal logic, we know that planned parenthood only hires good people, so the video MUST be a hoax just like bad climate data or no doc lones that do not flatter the applicant's ability to contribute economic value. ROFLMFO. And the libs are concerned about religion being an opiate like fairy tale, now they have a more insidious god to worship, their tampon praising ego self. ROFLMFO.
All praise the human tampons which in this case may be a bit literal. ROFLMFO.
you will never sell any mortgages or pick the "right" climate data points with that attitiude. ROFLMFO.
ROFLMFO, so does anyone in Chicago at Lollopalooza think I'm kidding now about the ark of the covenant?
We must all be vigilant for those glowing in regal splendor from knowledge and understanding of wheather patterns that hold our food and entire life and awkward sentence structures at their whim. ROFLMFO.
I will be posting soon on how to identify those likely involved in the pursuit of the Ark. Please stand by.
See the usatoday story on freak storm. ROFLMFO. Talk about a symbol of liberal politics.
its funny the cnn coverage is interspersed with links to cases where police shot suspects. How many reciprocal links do you think there are in those stories? With everyone passionately seeking justice, what could go wrong? Now, if their climate change stories had links to data downloads or lists of activity near specific measurement sites that effect local heating ( particulate sources, color of nearby surfaces reflective or absoprtive, wind and rain and clouds etc) so people could check for anomalies at each site that do not happen to cancel out elsewhere ( generally places have been becoming more urban, not more rural and particulate emissions likely decreasing). When cherry picking and hiding data is considered rational thought, your scientists are just tampon praisers but maybe everyone thinks they are valets so what difference does it make now. The valet who makes accurate predictions is the scientist.
That term is purely a reactionary phrase of no meaning other than contrary to the dictates of tampon praise. Maybe not contrary, perhaps complementary but as an expert on tampon praise, I only have incidental knowledge but perhaps my comments can allow you to interpret the text which references this philosophy.
You have to admit that politics and science can easily mix and the best solution is to publish more data and compare predictions and results. Or would you suggest just appeasing the biggest angriest dummmest aasssiest and praise the politically correct tampons? ROFLMFO.
Race is just a current topic where data does not seem to be used as much as it could be
and there have been active attempts to avoid investigation of claims that happen to match desire.
I think you will find that the sociophiles idea of data becomes lore when ego is at stake and testable
predictions are not what the brats want.
All praise the tampons and carbon limitation.
Too bad Beverly Hall can not accompany Forest Hayes and Beau Biden to help the Kenyans become more accomplished. ROFLMFO.
The libs have a plan- handicap and control and talk a good game ROFLMFO. Can you explain hilllary's approach to problem solving? The climate scientists may note that whoever has the ark of the covenant has put a heat dome over Iran maybe in response to the nuclear treaty. ROFLMFO. How will that effect global average temperatures and who will we have to trust as an interpretter of the data? ROFLMFO.
So tell me again why the climate data that will save the world is so carefully controlled and suscepitble to selection bias and manipulation?
All praise the human tampons.
You don't suppose economic numbers are manipulated too and that that will cure the sick and feed the poor?
While I like your adjective laden ad hominens, maybe you have found the crux of the matter. Assumng your commentary is accurate to the extent it is testable ( " this isn't right , it isn't even wrong " ROFLMFO), the democrats "sling sludge" that happens to be overly flattering rather than critical. Dante seemed to think flattery was a significant sin, the rational people think they can talk goodness into existence by killing or at least stifling the messenger.
A rational secular society, the Tory-Comrade society, should be able to gracefully and cogently integrate diverse opinions into the debate over matters of mutual interest even when articulated less with the quality of shakespeare but the poignant and titilating style of the Trump's barbs. This is what we should set our minds upon, tolerance for differing opinions which by nature will not be flatering much of the time.
there was a recent headline about ownership rates hitting record lows. This could be the fate of many social programs that are not built on a foundation of reality. Once the ego bubble bursts, there will be a lot of angry people.
There was no production to realize all the great boasts. It would not have been a bubble if the hopes reflected the real future. With everyone going into sociophilism, there was not much you could do to develop economic value. I will just sit this out until a tory invites me to participate and then I would plan on some long discussions before we become happy campers. ROFLMFO. Everyone was worried about the critical loner, when the real problem was the over eager loaner. ROFLMFO.
Why do you think the US was so revolutionary and what was the contitution reacting against? ROFLMFO.
Eventually mind control to defend the ego of the angry dum aas will be accepted by main stream as it always is to he limits of available technology. You would think that anti-ignorance people would not be in favor of privacy but here too their feelings are more important than others. All praise the tampons.
In the meantime, remember that the circus only continues while the bread supply holds out.
Sociophiles manage to achieve status by enforcing tampon praise directed at themselves. This is exactly the opposite of science and the skills needed to build on a foundation of truth.
Did Chelsea help Kenya with their public health issues? ROFLMFO.
The sociophiles are great in scripted environments but as soon as reality enters its "every man for himself" as they have no effective response among themselves and the cohesion disappears. I don't want to fault Chelsea for trying but you really have to wonder if they even understand what they are trying to do.
Maybe Chelsea could marry Dr. Huxtable.
When they tell people to be more tolerant of video of police shootings but consider video of planned parenthood inappropriate. can you trust even the secret climate models?
There is no science with a big S, there is the universe and our attempts to understand it and build upon the past. Sometimes we need supercolliders and supercomputers, other times a dirty kitchen sink to find rules with predictive or design value. When people start pontificating, it usually amounts to deciding what they want and then rationalizing to a conclusion that sounds logical. If you beleive in personal autonomy, and one life depends on the total absorption of another, I guess you could have differences of opinion but one consideration seems to be when the fetus becomes aware, whatever that means.
In the meantime, there needs to be more academic research that may or may not ever answer these questions and one step towards that would be making more data public when it may be the basis of handicapping others who are forced to praise some tampons or other. ROFLMFO.