Look at any biotech and compare the claims made before and after clinical trials which try to predict what a drug will do. ROFLMFO. In cases of modelling, "good" models may not be good enough for planning and decision making. Indeed a good start on climate model could have sign errors in predictions for many results. I have no idea, but the theory needs to be proven in things that can not be intellectualized or brow beaten away by sociophiles in white coats. ROFLMFO. All praise the tampons.
but yet control freaks continue to talk value into tampons and get angry when other do not play along.
Then they get angry when the essentials like food, water, and energy become limited. The tampon praising death spiral always requires an angry dum aas to try to fix everything without being able to state problems in a concise useful way. Unaccustomed to criticism, the brats just get angrier and angrier.
All praise the tampons. ROFLMFO.
All praise the tampons. Is this what people dedicted their lves to? ROFLMFO.
Are you part of a traditional family or a modern lib family comprised of only one mindful adult? ROFLMFO.
People who think they can talk reality into existence seem to think the voting machine is the final word on reality. This would be another case of rejecting many of their own sacred role models. Buffet for example recognizing the importance of knowing the omniscience weighting machine and knowing when the voting machine is wrong. With science, peer review and opinion is not a replacement for experiment and testing. However, it may require a lot of experience to try to communicate with the weighting machine, doing good experiments, and interpretation of its results may require a voting machine :) Not a lot different from the Bible, much different from contemporary theories. All praise the voting machine. ROFLMFO.
this is what happens with tamppn praise, it always boomer rangs. All praise the tampons.
Many have dedicated their lives to insuring that the right tampons remain highly praised, not mocked but the weighting machine may have a different idea of what retains and what luzes value.
All praise the tampon prophet. ROFLMFO.
Demanding honor and respect may not always produce the expected results among sensitive brats.,
Are you dizzy when you're stoned?
This is what happens when you let the music be your master. ROFLMFO.
But if you had listened to Oprah on the importance of fundamentals like agricuture to making society stable and insuring there is enough food for the poor, you would have alredy become a citizen scientist and been working on ways to prevent or mitigate the disease even if your own food supply is not likely to be effected by this or climate change. ROFLMFO. Oh wait, doh! ROFLMFO. Well at least everyone can throw tampons at each other. ROFLMFO.
Generally the "best" works have been peer reviewed but there are cases where a paradigm change is hard to create. In this controversial area, if an alternative can be stated well enough to test, and it not obviously frivolous, it may be worth comparing to more popular theories. Your point is good, but lack of peer reviewed publications could occur for many reasons although sure often the reason is merit. Even in science, the voting machine has to give way to the weighting machine. ROFLMFO.
The gxxgle hits suggest he is a bit of a fringe scientist but there should be some reasonably easy way to test the theories and see which one is best. This does not have anything to do with credibility, social skills, or political correctness. The test of a true prophet is his predictions coming true. Could anyone agree on a test or prediction that can compare the two theories and determine which is more important or if both effects are being ignored by the other group and hybrid theory including solar and atmopheric changes is needed to plan for the future? Historically anyway col dseems to be worse than heat.
this is what sociophiles care about. All praise the human tampons. ROFLMFO.
It is not natural for sociophiles to come together to increase capability. While maybe this starts off as a racial sounding idea, but we can remember Tulsa too, it is no different than predatory capitalists such as Bil Gates or those who would burn down others' factories to boost their own standing in the community. Many social scientists seem to define cultures by how they produce- hunter gatherers for example- or who controls the means of production- a big Marx theme IIRC. When only 2 percent of the economy is based on essentiais, most people no longer care about the fringe minority who lacks social skills while trying to get the crops to grow. Instead of a barn raising party or a day in the field with the crops, the sociophiles sit around trying to figure out how to fool other fellow humans into buying highly praised tampons or making angry demands which is probably more direct and eliminates the need for some tampon praise but the demands usually end up involving tampon praise.
Having segregated the bread people from the circus people, both can operate with fewer impediments. However, the circus people think they can save the world from the evil bread people and that is when the end begins- you should consider Oprah's attitude towards cattle if you do not like expensive beef although you can also argue about the less liberal ethanol lobby. All praise the human tampons, ROFLMFO. Fund raisers, but no one who thinks critically about DNA ROFLMFO.
For the longest time, I thought the libs were telling teens they could make their own reality better than the old people- the generation gap and all that stuff. They did not just avoid "role models" but assumed they were all evil and all they need do is get rid of the old racists with ideas that limited people from self-actualization. Now the chronologically challenged teens don't just need someone to teach them how to grow up, they also need a scape goat after getting what they wanted. The dummer they look, the angrier they get. ROFLMFO.
All praise the humans.
Hey, I know, come up with a "role model" who brings you 10 simple ideas cast in stone and then teach the teens about this person and his life and times and how society grew from him. ROFLMFO.
its funny the rational people don't think fairy tales are useful and then spend all their time looking for and propping up fictional role models against reality. If you need a role model, where did the first one come from? ROFLMFO. Anyone looking for a role model is a sociophile, not a scientist- often people may have nothing in common except a specific research interest which is enough to unite them, similar to a barn raising party. Although, I suppose a PhD program is a lot like an apprenticeship and in fact passing wisdom between generations, like the Bible does, is an important thing and needs some communication between old and new people. The libs talk about two people who love each other, but in reality a comon external challenge may be all that is needed to bring them together.
This is the same old "we can talk reality into existence" that prevents people form even stating problems so that they can be logically attacked. Talking value into an economy is how the voting machine departs from the weighting machine and sociophiles make money but the bubble finally bursts and everyone is angry.
Its elemental my deer Watson, if you invite Hannity into your Holmes maybe you can put your finger on the issues that really influence the economy. ROFLMFO. Or, you can ask the liberals, "what difference does it make now?" ROFLMFO. Maybe some make fun of Sean for his interpretations of events in Baltimore, but even the capitalists should appreciate the impact of an empty stadium.
Still, the economy comes down to the essentials of food and energy and the social issues will be hard to fix when people are concerned about starving.
So what liberal jumble of comments will pass as analysis useful for problem solving? ROFLMFO.
But how much carbon per gallon? ROFLMFO. Not as funny as the tire burning desalinization plant,
but interesting to compare to a national pipeline system like the freeway system. You could put water and oil
pipe under all the freeways and make the US more resilent to climate change. OR you can give everyone free food and self esteem until it is gone. ROFLMFO.
The original idea behind states was to act as testing vehicles and maybe to recognize differences in objectives and challenges in different regions of earth as well as preferences amont those who self segregated to various cities. Regionalism itself does not seem to be a problem but for people claiming to help visualize the world, and maybe concentrating on high climbers versus their friends in low places, there are real differences of geography that need to be explored. Do the people in Nantucket even know how to best describe the land of fruits and nuts? ROFLMFO.
These are the issues vexxing the national organizations such as banks.
these are the issues the fill the sociophiles. minds. ROFLMFO.
I take it Dr. Huxtable has a different opinion? ROFLMFO. All praise the tampons.