% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.


starcutspin 18 posts  |  Last Activity: Nov 16, 2015 4:19 PM Member since: Nov 13, 2006
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • starcutspin by starcutspin Nov 16, 2015 4:19 PM Flag

    So what happened to the idiot pumpers who said the reverse split was a great idea and bring in institutional investors and the big money? I guess they erased their posts.

  • Reply to


    by icebears Nov 13, 2015 11:00 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Nov 16, 2015 4:00 PM Flag

    I looked at the CC transcript, including the Q&A, and was impressed. I get that this company has been around a while, and the 3d industry has tanked, but want to be in this zone because it is technology with disruptive potential as it unfolds (not just disruptive technology that maybe will some day unfold). It is hard to pick the winners and losers on the manufacturing and sales end, but MTLS can benefit from a lot of software customers and is focusing (and investing in) new production material like metal. So I am putting money into it,
    the R&D causing a loss is in my view okay at this stage, 2-4 years we shall see. I hope $7-8 is a good range and we do not fall into the dilution/rs trap, but I like their position in the developing field.

  • Reply to

    JR selling again

    by benbillings Nov 9, 2015 8:08 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Nov 11, 2015 5:53 PM Flag

    Devil's advocate. he is getting cash to pay for the Spokane engine tests. But wWhat happened to the
    million dollars from China? Which nutshell is that under.

  • Reply to

    quarter #'s release

    by deserttrader_2003 Oct 22, 2015 4:40 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Nov 11, 2015 12:28 PM Flag

    Looks like the 52 week low is in the works, you sure know how to call em. $24. LOL

  • Reply to

    quarter #'s release

    by deserttrader_2003 Oct 22, 2015 4:40 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Nov 4, 2015 7:13 AM Flag

    $900 million write off, which is not even the final number. Premarket already down 6%. Nice call, robo.

  • Reply to


    by starcutspin Jun 1, 2015 4:36 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Nov 3, 2015 2:04 PM Flag

    Looks like somebody is steadily unloading into the next news.

  • Reply to

    Florino Role

    by stockteky Oct 9, 2015 8:56 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Oct 28, 2015 12:30 PM Flag

    You must be joking. Citi had fundamentals, underlying value, a massive global presence, a legendary history, a government subsidy, and still does. BCLI had no underlying value, no evidence or record of sustainable business, zilch, so they declared an r/s and the shareprice I predicted. Citi has done just fine and remains a leading bank. AIG did the same thing. They always had an ongoing global and very successful underwriting business, so when the credit swap default business in the UK blew up, they eliminated the bad business and declared a large r/s based on the underlying business, and are doing just fine. This company has no underlying business, lousy fundamentals, and is a one trick pony so they prematurely declared an r/s to attract deep pockets and institutional investors. WHERE ARE THEY. The shareprice is still miles below the r/s price. It was a stupid move (for outside shareholders, are you one?) and has nothing to do with Citi.
    Really dumb, but of course your name association with Citi I suppose is meant to gild this weed. You have got to get real if you want to have any credibility at all.

  • Reply to

    Hey CEO, you idiot.

    by westplains Oct 22, 2015 5:08 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Oct 27, 2015 10:05 AM Flag

    Overpaid $400million for MarketBot, that was our money. Indeed, who got fired?

  • Reply to

    Florino Role

    by stockteky Oct 9, 2015 8:56 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Oct 22, 2015 6:25 PM Flag

    "Citi did it after the crash to raise the pps to make it harder to short"up penny stock" That is one of the dumbest posts I have are comparing and justifying the motive for a reverse split of a start up penny stock to a well established ongoing major global bank? Stupid..

  • Reply to

    Florino Role

    by stockteky Oct 9, 2015 8:56 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Oct 19, 2015 4:33 PM Flag

    Was the R/S helpful? Was it premature? Was it necessary? And, what happened to the value of your investment afterwards?

  • Reply to

    Florino Role

    by stockteky Oct 9, 2015 8:56 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Oct 14, 2015 3:56 PM Flag

    Everyone that held at the (premature) R/S is still way under water. What happened to all the institutional investors and deep pockets that was supposed to attract?. The price, even before the CEO change, was losing ground, that just made it worse.

  • starcutspin starcutspin Oct 1, 2015 12:20 PM Flag

    Obviously there is a story behind this that insiders are not talking about, however it is a very material change and shareholders should be given a full explanation accordingly.. Transparency.

  • Reply to

    zacks talked with bcli managment

    by nikayavos Sep 25, 2015 4:24 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Sep 29, 2015 2:02 PM Flag

    It seems Mr Lebovitz is the largest shareholder, so basically he appointed himself new CEO, but why? T shareprice is crashing and mum is the word.I expected it would go down after the premature reverse split, but this is ridiculous coming out of management.

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Sep 28, 2015 2:56 PM Flag

    Shareprice is about half what it was after the reverse split. What a brilliant move.

  • Reply to

    HP may acquire Stratasys

    by elixir_india Sep 22, 2015 1:08 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Sep 23, 2015 3:40 PM Flag

    They acquired COMPAQ,etc because no organic revenue growth now comes the slight of hand. Mergers and acquisitions and spin offs are the survival tools of failed leadership, roil the accounting, 1 + 1 = 3, just wait.
    HP is over, and should be. I would not put any money into the company on the basis that it is the future of
    3D printing for equity investors.

  • Reply to

    Slowley but surely

    by america23owe Sep 20, 2015 2:17 PM
    starcutspin starcutspin Sep 23, 2015 3:25 PM Flag

    Darthtrader, there is apparently an underlying (desperate?) effort to keep the price over a dime, which is a trigger to the credit line, do you know the details of how that works? 200 million shares
    left for dilution, plus an inevitable reverse split at some point. What exactly is going to keep us (as opposed to insiders) out of this ever deeper hole? A knife, and a couple of utterly undefined
    contracts? I do not see the path out for longs, other than a buyout at about the current shareprice
    and a little premium but who needs it? Basically, what is the Crucible IP worth bearing in mind Apple already has what it wants. Everyone has been waiting for years for the company to exhibit revenue from a disruptive liquidmetal technology that flows to LQMT shareholders.....never a dime.

  • Reply to

    CEO replaced?

    by goingeasy007 Sep 23, 2015 10:47 AM
    starcutspin starcutspin Sep 23, 2015 3:06 PM Flag

    It is very strange, and it always raises concerns when when the top person suddenly leaves (look what just happened at LaQuinta) without clarification. Very amateurish, and it is already costing us. What, one wonders, has gone off the tracks that we do not know about? Quick follow up PR recovery is necessary. and if it does not come, prepare for the worst.

  • starcutspin by starcutspin Sep 10, 2015 2:58 PM Flag

    The REGRF April 30 balance sheet shows accounts receivable of $1,090,000, declared as their asset, but not much cash. Is that the supposed Chinese investment, if so it apparently has not been paid. RGUS shows accounts payable in a similar amount, maybe it is that? If so , it is intercompany fooling around. Where is the $million plus the Chinese investors have put into the company (s)? It does not show up on the balance sheets.