As you well know, I was describing the well known (or should be well known) fate of an r/s when it is declared
absent the upside financial performance, and shareprice falls and is subjected to more shorting. The excuse is to attract new institutional buyers to hold the price up and contribute to shareholder value. However the price has dropped, substantially, as predicted, rather than risen on all that market demand that did not happen. Staying down is not volatility. In my opinion, they were too early with the r/s, and may turn out they did not need one, which hurts longs. Insider shareholders do not really share your fate (unless you are one?) because if their sharecount drops, they can always grant themselves new subscription rights. I am actually long on the stock but have protected the downside. I hope they come up with another Biogen experience for shareholders, but that will require another kind of stock split (I bought Biogen at $7 several splits ago) so I can afford to dabble and have. Your problem, sonny, is that you are in love with the idea of her, rather than the woman herself, so to speak. Calm down. It is better to be lucky than smart, and in your case, indispensable...
Sense of humor please.
I agree we were looking and hoping for 30's to be the bottom after the crash, then comes along the class action suit and related quality issues. I wonder if on July 30 someone is going to put a reserve on this because it seems to be hanging over any potential comeback and the much needed financial performance improvement..
Reverse splits rarely work to shareholder advantage, because they do not change the weak fundamentals but create a downside bonanza for shorts, so unless there is actual performance in hard numbers on top of the r/s, expect the shareprice to fall right back down. The consequence is that you own a fraction of your old sharecount, at a lower price. It is called being washed out. Insiders simply issue themselves new subscription rights for new shares, that which you will never see. Everybody knows this.
You may be right, and we are near the bottom but there is still plenty of downside. I would like to see it bump thirty and rebound, the industry has legs and this company is not new to the business. The crash end on some decent numbers coming out.
Ah heck, we are still under the R/S price by 18% following the update yesterday....no big negatives, either, and we were told by the kids that the floor was $3.65, however does one explain that? Happy talk. Eagerness. Inexperience?
Solid report going forward no notable negatives, for that should see some upward movement tomorrow for long investors.
So what's it gonna be, a pop up following today's last minute update? Should be, but it won't hold without some hard news. Let's see it at least at the r/s number with upside, rather than diminishing trading range
(whatever did happen to that $3.65 floor?)
I am not sure that the net book value of a company with cash and a futuristic product in a futuristic industry
defines the investment strategy at thirty four dollars, given the share price record. What is the upside, the risk reward. Is there something here beyond the math?
I was wondering if anyone had noticed the announcements about the acquisition and the sales channel through Walmart, because there is no reaction at all in the market. Basically, what is going on here? This is on my buy list at $34 so looks like that is pretty iffy. Thanks in advance for anyone who might fill in the gaps.
My my, seems I struck a nerve, so sensitive. You protest too much, though, so many angry posts. Still trading well below the R/S and plenty of downside left, its early yet. At least you "silenced" your childish name calling, well I did suggest growing up. Thanks for playing.
Zhou + SINA want to buy (steal) the company on the cheap. Their offer is not binding, they can change the number any time and have enough votes to make it happen. That is one reason it is trading below the
if, and. and but offer amount. Right now, I expect to see this go through at some point down the road under $5, what would be the motive for the Chairman to push the company to increase performance and push the price up? Just the opposite. This is already cooked,
"Full of garbage, hilarious, pathetic troll" this is the kind of childishness that comes out when the kiddies
just don;t get their way. Grow up, jham.
WIth SINA in, that does it, already 48% so they will take it private at any price they feel like paying, forget the "independent" committee, this is China. Would much rather have had a white knight bidding up. We are screwed.
Typically, "outside" advisers like investment bankers will be hired and paid a fee of several million dollars to end up supporting the offer to take it private. My guess is that $7.38 is an opening bid (why would he open high?) and we can expect it to go up bot not anything like the IPO price, and certainly not in line with the risk/reward most of us have been looking for. However, they will need the votes of the institutional holders
for approval, but they typically follow the recommendations of the "outside" advisers to cover their butz as well. Only a well funded activist. investor could blow this off track, and no-one of substance is going to step into this Chinese quagmire. in my opinion.
The anecdotal stories are very encouraging, but the fact remains that this is still trading well below the R/S
price, as predicted. From the ROI perspective, this is not a good thing for longs.
I don't get the pump and dump here at volume, up on news, likely market if any is probably outside the US
(China), then the dump. Somebody must be trying to unload for pennies.