You started another thread with the intention of covering your idiotic proposition. I've asked you 6 times who are you giving those 5 to 1 odds to and you start another thread without ever answering my question. You're a squirmy little worm that lies repeatedly.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Excrement of this board, cloudy_day_jane, and now the sixth time I'm asking because you posted, ""stolesomeshares seeking attention I'll give 5 to 1 he makes a new alias soon." Who is getting those odds? You are such a clump of excrement making offers you have no intention of fulfilling.
and BTW, cloudy_day_jane has no other option other than to post stupid.
My game? Oh that game where I put a buy on QTWW Oct 2 9am (QTWW @ $3.52 - Undervalued Strong buy) which the sixth message on the message board page, THAT GAME? No, that game isn not known everywhere. Think again, idiot.
Hi there board excrement. Your rampantly posting stupid again. Oct 2, 2014 9:00 AM I posted
QTWW @ $3.52 Undervalued - Strong Buy }}}}} and on that thread you replied something about it trading to $2
Now you want to play alias swap just like the other idiot ibmwatcher. Some people are so freakin dumb they never wise up and that's you, you dolt.
Excrement of this board posted, "stolesomeshares seeking attention. I'll give 5 to 1 he makes a new alias soon." But the board excrement can not answer the following question. Who will you be giving 5 to 1 odds to anyway? Does excrement refer to you accurately enough since you most often post about which alias belongs to another or should I use a frequent reference? Do tell, board idiot. The irony to all this is it's you that is seeking attention. When you get challenged for making dumb remarks, the questions go unanswered. Who is going to get 5 to 1 odds?
Friday going to be green just like Thursday. If you take a look at COCO it may be that Bank of America is arranging a buyout. BoA acquired Merrill Lynch. I do know people there and knew them prior to the acquisition. This is not me benefitting from inside info. I'm connecting the dots.
I have no clue who Don is. Don't care actually. You're cluttering up the board is what you're doing. "I do believe there are many hints that God's purpose for me is to become a preacher. That is all I really want to talk about anyways.' And I'm telling you this is not the place for it. Furthermore, to be a preacher, you need a following. They need to be receptive. No one here is listening to you. You are oblivious to being shunned and unwanted. Your apologetic tone is as genuine as you having posted you went all in, taking out a second mortgage but need almost $30 more per share for that call to put you in the green. Who here truly needs to hear from you? Anyone? If you're out there step up for knowin2holdem,
since I warned. I feel like I'm posting to fifth graders sometimes. That date and time above is recent compared to when ibmwatcher began pumping this at 30 cents with the message it would be going to a dollar.
I began warning back then.
You asked me a question you need not have asked. Too lazy to expand messages within a thread is what it is. Here's what I said on that thread yesterday. I knew that the start of the fourth week of Sept. Now it's ready for those willing to take on high risk for the potential high gain. Potential doesn't come with a guarantee. If that isn't clear enough for you, too bad
Anyone needing to learn megatard reasoning needs to read those posters.
There is no irrefutable evidence that God exists, let alone that God is in control. Mixing stock opinion with religion makes no sense. None that you can reference anyway since you took out a second mortgage to go all in. If the share price quintuples, you'll almost be at breakeven. Or God is punishing you, and doing so severely. Ever hear the phrase, silence is golden? The website blogmetrics has a list of the 50 top religious blogs. But for you to use it and for you to discuss QTWW matters here would show you have common sense. I don't expect to see that from you.
You should see a doctor. Have a checkup to see if you have a chemical imbalance. ibmwatcher was pumping a pink sheet stock at 30 cents saying it would head to a dollar quickly. Knowing that poster can be seen as a boiler room scammer with past and failed penny pumps, I went to that message board and warned regularly. Click my alias it's all there. So yesterday with that once 30 cent stock now under 11 cents, I laid off. I said if you want to own it as a very high risk choice, fine. But why you aren't thinking clearly, it is not my problem. It's yours. On another subject when ibmwatcher has said you and I are the same person several times and you don't say a thing, your way of thinking sucks. And what next? You tell me I'm another poster, as if that matters!