get rid of this BOD
thank u all for the clarification. rpgr2000 poster was repeating info that did evidently show up on stock alerts on multiple brokers trading platforms. this is not new as was approved in the past is the final analysis.
i never expect dramatic comebacks on friday op/ex..........but i do think adding sh today could yield profits next week. im not seeing the basis for the decline from close to 9 /sh down towards 7.80/sh on the belinostat approval. ( i acknowledge sppi has that milestone payment for the fda approval but its a long term winner for sppi- absolutely almost guaranteed belinostat/beleodaq will be long term winner for sppi, as i see it). the short interest bumped up approx 200,000 sh........not a clear cut indicator of anything......see what next short interest data will show itself to be. i would think it declines .
man,,,,,,,,this is brutal......... gotta be honest.........dont know how smart folks are giving any credibility to the "weak patent" #$%$ story put out by self professed sppi shortinterest holder.
SEEMS THIS POSTER " rpgr2000: FABRICATED THE STORY..............
appreciate being corrected if im wrong. i see no documents filed as to a new/recent secondary sale of stock here.
i sold some sppi because i knew the article would cause others to sell- off out of panic.........and the world wide crash in stock indexes founded on the precarious euro bank issue certainly exacerbated the likely decline yesterday. furthermore.......the cable wonks have been reported on the outflows of monies from the russell indecies.........this week was worst week for russell indexes in last 2 years i believe i heard someone report. anyway....... i bought shares back near close of session yesterday. so even if it dont make logical sense to panic........ it might make logical sense to assume others will panic based on that article and the knowledge that the article was possibly "talking points" issued by hedgies to serve as a basis for a bear raid.
lol......... dude comes to this mb, plays dumb, and posts as follows : 60 % chance of an economic well is a bit of a gamble"..........LOL..............
royl is the speculative play.......it is a diversified part of one's portfolio,.....the speculative portion of one's portfolio.........it is not your utility with a divy............ and this guy concludes........this is a "bit of a gamble"..........
LOL........... im gonna tell this to my big busted personal trainer, tan and hot blond by the way.......at the gym this morning........... shes also my financial advisor. hot beach body g string wearing......inclined to go topless personal trainer who also advises me on my stock portfolio despite no formal education or training or experience on wall street........... YES ITS A BIT OF A GAMBLE ON MY PART.
LIKE I SAID TO YOU TWO DAYS AGO......... BASED ON YOUR POSTS,,, THE ONLY REASON YOU ARE HERE IS CAUSE YOU ARE SHORT ROYL.......... glad u came out the closet. its america. 21st century. san francisco. welcome sailor.
chas- you were correct about the 40,000 acres left to be explored. i am brain-dead. thx 4 ur effort to wake me up.
rvc- i appreciate ur corrective alert to me. im trading two handfuls of stock daily and im reading stuff all day long and i get my data wrong at times. i usually post that my data is based on my suspect recollection.
OK.........1 SQ MILE = 640 ACRES. i will do the math and i apologize for my incorrect data.
100 sq miles = 64,000 acres.
royales 105,000 acres less 64,000+ acres already subject to seismic survey leaves 40,000 acres more or less yet to be surveyed. ( this is what poster chas apprised me of and i did not pick up on his correct analysis)
oh yeah.......if an activist like bill ackman/ icahn took a 5-10 % STAKE in sppi and then forced a special s/h meeting to get the activists choices for BOD elected.........then that too would expedite the improvement in sppi mkt cap upwards. any activist/private equity has the funds to squeeze raj nice and hard ..........sppi has low mkt cap. chump change for private equity activissts
jasra.......following your line of thought, to rephrase, you suggest that by taking the stock down on both good news and on bad news( bash article from yesterday for ex).......that this is a signal to any prospective investors to stay away. i can see that especially for small cap co like sppi. and even moreso for small cap./small float companies. getting rid of raj from CEO position and putting in a top tier outsider might alter such ongoing phenomenon. also......getting rid of raj's outrageous compensation would help a lot........at least make compensation tied to stock performance .
also .......the simple growth of product line and growth in sales of said fda approved portfolio would have to trump even the most ardent fraud grip on sppi corp. belinostat sales will make a difference , imo, by mid to end 2015. fusilev patent will hold any and all legal challenges imo from my readings. i think the article saying otherwise was rank amateur hour. we need some positive clinical trial results on our pipeline making fda nda submission a good shot for fda approval decision., if so.......game over........double digit pps.
i am of belief author was issued talking points to craft that article wholly absent of any citation or attributions so as to not be able to check if his stmts were/are accurately repeated from the source itself. this author was not the source of the vast majority of ideas,concepts, theories,facts,notions set forth in his article. without fact checking its unreliable and likely misrepresentations galore for propaganda purposes.
most non academic piece of writing one can imagine. any grad school graduate in any discipline would know that paper was trash.
chas- in another post i quoted you from rampart filing with ASX that "currently royl and rtd are in negotiations regarding the western/central (? ) block ( dont recall precise quote.
what do u make of that verbiage.?
well royl corp per my recollection has leasehold interests on 105,000 alaskan north slope acres.
and the seismic survey covered per my poor recollection approx 150 acres. so............unless im wrong.........105,000 less 150 equals 104, 850 acres yet to be seismic surveyed/explored. chas. let me know if i am incorrect. but thats my recollection. i dont go looking up data every day so i rely on memory.
thats nothing compared to my jousting on yahoo mb :))
i got a large following of haters.......... i am a sob,,,,,,,,,, its my childhood experiences.........