I don't believe it's a question of whether we believe it works. It's a question of whether or not it's truly a monopoly as claimed initially. My hunch is that management is aware of Microsoft's pursuit in this area and it just might be docker that arrived to the party sooner. Yes, they virtualize Linux apps today but it appears it will do more than that in short order. PB send tweet "remember we have 3 products." Now why would he say that... When I raised questions I was accused of being a sympathizer to naysayers. I sold half of my position at big loss. Unfortunate as I had ample opportunities to trade it.
I will take a look at SPCB
No position. I'm not liking the direction the other board is taking with moving to the private board. It is raising a few flags in my mind. Granted, we have an Entity or two that is working against us to no avail but I believe there may be something else in play. I don't typically converse via email but I'm not sure I want to make public for good reason.
Hey common, when you get a chance I'd like to talk to you about a couple of things. My e maiil is my name and ends in the same company that runs this MB. Thx
So you source 451 as conclusive evidence? Have they actually tested the products? As you would say, show me the test results! Btw, 451's SWOT counters your claims regarding Glassware. Can have it both ways. It's either A new product in an early stage or it's been on the market (as you say) since as early as 2009, 2010, 2011 or whatever your evolving position is today.
More misquoting, just like Techstockfordummies. Not a competitor, the nightmare would be for the hedge fund that is paying 37% or more interest on a low float stock. The fact that you are here and respond within mins tells me the stakes are high. You are on Twitter searching for any info that might tip you off to what management might discuss on March 30. It's certainly not an ideal situation to be in for a HF when nobody is certain what will be covered.
That's all you have to say? I believe we heard the "what are you smoking" comment regarding the very existence of Glassware over a year ago. How did that one turn out? Do I know if GW on chip is possible? No clue. But I do know GW on a chip would be a big htmare for some. That means you are wasting your time trying to convince readers it isn't possible. You already hid good Twitter news that came from Laura. This yahoo account is exhausted. Time to move on Derek/ FlyboyS.
What will be the new angle for Your next alias Derek? The above is nothing but recycled Derek Smith talking points. It's time for something new. For the next alias, may I suggest you play the "disgruntled investor" as opposed to the "concerned investor" that you initially attempted with the Zigzag alias? Or perhaps you can play the role of the cousin of the "Unnamed" Dell EUC architect that you brought up over 10 times.
It's possibly a software that to advertise their site. It will find tickers via stock scanning, in this case possibly stocks that decreased off certain metrics. ANY was popular with traders just a few trading days ago and they may be a ideal target for this spammer.
Derek, what's your take on your pal Munching Moez Kassam at Anson getting all giddy about ANY options? Don't tell me he's buying puts. If there will indeed be options we will all find out if a large entity is buying to hedge themselves. This certainly would destroy your concerted effort unde multiple aliases that ANY is headed for failure. There would be 0 reason to buy call options if the stock was indeed a dud.
Like I said, you make it too obvious. Derek aka Flyboys etc MO included copying and pasting Ihub posts onto the Yahoo board. You need to to a better job of
Covering up your multiple aliases. Switch it up or something. Maybe you can pose as the disgruntled investor as opposed to the concerned investor next time? BTW, how's business at Orchard Park out in Canada lately?
Speaking of Tweets, I believe you would know best. After all, you are working real hard on Twitter and asking questions as you look for any ammo to use on this message boards. 80% of your profile is regarding Twitter including reviving old Sphere tweets. Unfortunately Laura gave you some "Good News." It was so good that you decided not to post it for all of us to read. Must not have been good enough news. Look forward to your next Twitter investigative reporting. By the way, nice clown face on Twitter. Fits you well Derek. I enjoy the laughs.
Derek, so did you forget your yahoo login password for Flyboys? There is a lost password option FYI.
I look forward to the next tech expert that you tweet as you look for any Sphere holes to exploit in your game.
How dare Sphere provide a "goal" as opposed to guidance. I guess if it's simply a goal, that must mean mamagement will feel less obligated reach their objectives. It was a loophole for a management, correct?
As I said, God forbid Sphere assures they are well capitalized to expand. So if they do in fact raise capital on future date, what's your point? That it will dilute the shareholders so they should sell their stock so the shorts can cover more shares? I'm still waiting for the collapse of ANY that Derek and crew promised would occur months ago.
Derek, I see you have given up playing the "concerned investor" tactic under your newly created zigzag username. Or did you forget you didnt login into the retired Flyboys yahoo account? BTW, "You just can't make this stuff up" was a favorite line with DS's multiple aliases. You are making it too easy..
Too funny, Zig's response to Laura's answer was "Great News!" As if he was really excited to hear Laura's answer. Zig's followup question is a classic Derek tactic, shift the goal posts away from Windows since he has clearly lost that battle. Not to mention it appears he retired the Flyboys yahoo account indefinitely after he poked fun of any potential Microsoft and Sphere alliance.
Zig, looks like you have exhausted this username along with the others. Time to move on to
The next yahoo username. Below you ask why "more than fifty percent had to be written off the books" and demand answers. Some responses arrive but you cboose to ignore them and later claim in a later thread that it was "BS." So why ask? Wishful thinking on your part? How about FOS.
Yes Mens, an excellent report. I'm sure you fact-checked everything from Tapedrive before commenting or you liked the overly negative tilt to his posts. Take your pick.
You asked me about 3 times and I addressed it already. Let's move on from the repetitive nonsense. Again, Please get your eyes checked, there is a Struftpete (you spelled his name wrong) and myself (Strut1702) on Ihub. Do they both read the same to you? Come on Mens.
One of Zigzag's first followers on Twitter is "Nissim S." Quite the coincidence...Nissim is part of or knows the HF that is short a few million shares. NIssim used to spew his ANY propaganda on twitter until he folded and blocked his tweets a few months ago.
I like how ZigZag (Derek, flyboys etc) makes misc. posts beginning on March 3 followed by spending 85% of his tweets on Sphere. The guy thinks he can outsmart the readers and make himself look independent from the shorts. Too bad his tactics mirror Derek's. Look at his followup question to Laura for example.