dream on.....Babcock and ISR will do nothing because they are part of the scam. Ever since they did the deal with Maxim the pps has been pumped to over 3 and then dumped below 2...twice.
Cramer, the Street, CNBC that gives Cramer a platform.
Everyone should stop watching CNBC and tell your friends and neighbors to do the same. We have all had enough and lost way too much money for these scams to just keep happening over and over and over again.
Stop watching CNBC
they won't do anything because they are part of this pump and dump. They did a deal with Maxim and since then the pps has been pumped and dumped to 3 and back at least twice in less than a year. Do you think ISR did not know the reputation of Maxim? they won't do anything at all and as usual the average Joe is screwed by wall street...it never ends. Cramer and the Street and CNBC have been running this scam for more than 10 years! everybody knows it and yet where is the SEC?
are you tired of Cramer and the Street running pump and dumps and cheating average Joes out of their hard earned cash while they eat like kings every night?
Boycott CNBC until they put a stop to this
I seriously doubt that he is using his real name.......and the SEC will do nothing...Cramer and the Street have been doing this for more than 10 years and nothing has happened to them yet. the SEC is a waste of time.....the f in US government is in the backpocket of wall street
so you think that savvy market participants traded 50 mil shares on the basis of 1 PR? what an idiot....
jeez dude is every post of yours dumber than the next? MNKD will be 70 bucks in less than 5 years on the diabetes treatment alone...the fact that nearly 400 other drugs can benefit from their Technosphere device is a game changer like the medical community has never seen...time to short companies that sell needles...hahaha . now it is truly confirmed that you are an idiot
the company has a legal and moral responsibility to be honest with the shareholders....that interview was as lame as they get.....he said nothing in defense of the company. and lets not forget that this is a company that does not allow investors to ask questions during quarterly reports.....and I say again; ever since they did the deal with Maxim the stock has been pumped and dumped to over 3 bucks twice now...and the company has done nothing to address this matter....why?
ever since the company got in bed with Maxim the pps has gone over 3 bucks and back down twice.....ISR knows what they are doing...the BoD dines in fine restaurants every night while their investors get screwed out of our hard-earned money. they should burn in hel for this
come out fighting? show aggression? what interview did you listen to? all he did was restate the headline. did not say anything about the hit piece on his reputation and company...said nothing to directly refute the accusation...said nothing to address the pump and dump. the fact is that ever since ISR gave Maxim 14 million shares the pps has been manipulated up and down over 3 bucks at least twice now in less than a year.
Do you really think that ISR did not know the rep of Maxim? really?
conjecture is speculation and that is all you do...your posts are worthless babbling and you should leave this board immediately
the studies are solid and conducted by the most reputable doctors and hospitals in the country...that is not the issue. the issue is that ISR did a deal with Maxim and the pps has been manipulated up and down ever since. I think ISR knew this was going to happen and are a party to it. Do you think they did not know the rep of Maxim before they gave them 14 million shares to play with?
everyone knows the rep of Maxim and I am sure ISR knew it too when they gave 14 million shares to play with. Now we have seen the stock manipulated to over 3 bucks an back down twice now in less than a year. And all ISR does is pretend to be innocent instead of coming out fighting for their reputation. The AF article made a very specific accusation and it deserves a very specific response..not just a restating of the headline.
the AF article made a specific accusation so Babcock should make a specific statement, evidence based, that directly refutes the claim. instead he simply repeats the headline
why not take the specific accusation from the AF article and refute with specific evidence? that's all i am asking for......i think that is reasonable