% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Insmed Incorporated Message Board

surestockholmes 83 posts  |  Last Activity: Oct 2, 2015 7:16 PM Member since: Jan 6, 2000
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Why The Maternal / Infant RSV Data Matters

    by nutmeg_bull Oct 2, 2015 2:41 PM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Oct 2, 2015 7:16 PM Flag

    nutmeg.............Excellent Summary

  • Reply to

    Why The Maternal / Infant RSV Data Matters

    by nutmeg_bull Oct 2, 2015 2:41 PM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Oct 2, 2015 6:32 PM Flag

    Some refer to it as the Water Fall Effect, forced selling. Many times this serves well to remove the questionable believers, margin players, those on the fence and short term traders clearing the way for new highs. A good total wash out. I am surprised we didn't find solid support at the the last Offering area. Tells me hard and heavy shorting pushed by many small factors, almost fells like it was pre-staged by multiple partys for the entire sector and some companys such as NVAX being more highly targeted than others. Hammer the indices it is in and force sale from multiple sides.

    This wild down side ride and NVAX is in better shape in all areas now than it was at 15. WOW what a set-up. When they are finished this will be another rocket ride.

  • surestockholmes by surestockholmes Sep 30, 2015 12:18 PM Flag

    Just look at all the newbies sent by the Hedgies to slam NVAX. Tells me it is a buy when they want your shares that bad. I wonder how much PJ and Tent. got paid for their dirty work. Sure hopin the SEC reams'em for manipulation.

  • Reply to


    by surestockholmes Sep 30, 2015 7:23 AM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 30, 2015 7:43 AM Flag

    In my opinion this entire program was manipulative against NVAX. I can understand following the general indices down. But I question down 58% in such a short time frame on positive news. I smell crooks. I have asked the SEC to investigate Ten. PJ and their motives.

  • surestockholmes by surestockholmes Sep 30, 2015 7:23 AM Flag

    A hidden agenda. Last yr positive raised his target from 9 to 10.50. Yesterday he tweets and slams NVAX. Wonder if he and others shorted waiting for his known negative comments. He is 33% correct on his picks with an average of 7% return in a 1 year time frame. Not very good . So i think he took the dark side. He was / is simply a plant for short hedgies.

    What makes his comments greater than :

    FDA Fast Track
    The many Tutes like FMR
    And now The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

    His motives need to be investigated.

    I agree Bio is in a negative trend but I question down 21% on what I view as very positive data and news. The Gates foundation does extensive DD on where their Foundation money goes. A penny pinchers tweet vs Millions of dollars for further Trials. I question his motives. Shame on PJ. He and PJ need to be put in the Hot Seat.

  • surestockholmes by surestockholmes Sep 29, 2015 6:51 PM Flag

    Straight up manipulative attack. BP and PJ should be investigated by the SEC. Beginning to wonder if there was some huge naked shorting today, to force stops losses and clear out all margin buys. To go down 21% on supportive data makes me wonder whom is driving the stock into the ground. I think we know why. If and when BP comes to the table with an offer the SEC needs to look very hard at them and PJ for stock manipulation. On a brighter note I thank them for opening the door for me to buy back some of what I sold in the 12s.

    I have sent my request to the SEC asking them to investigate the recent trading in NVAX. Yea I know the SEC is probably too busy or perhaps on the pay roll.

  • surestockholmes by surestockholmes Sep 28, 2015 1:32 PM Flag

    Along with other negatives for the market in general has given shorts all the ammo they need to destroy the pps. I certaintly hope NVAX comes out with some clarification on CT and also provides some positive maternal data. Otherwise the shorts are going to run this straight into the ground. Come on Stan give some clarification on the CT.

  • Reply to

    Answer me this

    by prentisscharlie Sep 24, 2015 1:17 PM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 24, 2015 1:27 PM Flag

    Wallstreet Crooks at work

  • surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 22, 2015 12:26 PM Flag

    O Bamie's Right Hand woman. We are not finished with trying to destroy America.

  • Reply to

    The little scam artist that started this mess

    by jeddavid2 Sep 21, 2015 7:04 PM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 22, 2015 7:28 AM Flag

    It is little Weasels’ like Shkreli that have helped to ruin drug development programs in the U.S.. All in the name of personal greed, or to pay off his poor performance from hedge funds he managed and lost big time. We can only hope he meets some un-curable disease or viral infection and suffers severly. Heres to the punk getting eaten alive by a parasite.

  • Reply to

    OT: the Feds

    by stockalias Sep 18, 2015 10:58 AM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 18, 2015 6:00 PM Flag

    Big Boyz would have sold off the general market. No matter what the FED did. Raise rates general market sell off, rates unchanged sell off.

    I think now they are concerned how a rate hike would impact globally.

    There is enough of the world that hates / envies the U.S.. We don't need to upset any other economies. In the end I think it would come to haunt the U.S., if the FEDs would have raised rates. But now perhaps other countries will send more dollars to the U.S.. Knowing the only reason the FED held back was not because of the U.S.. But rather the globe. I kinda see it as having an ace in the hole.

    The best part is NVAX fought the market and NVAX won. I see that as extremely positive.

  • Reply to

    Don't be fooled

    by surestockholmes Sep 15, 2015 7:46 AM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 16, 2015 7:06 AM Flag

    marathon...............that number is a direct quote from FDA. So far they are the only #s I have found. If you can find more relevant or correct data that would be great. I agree the #s and %s are not very clear. As to just Fast Track %s. To me the statement from the FDA quote is not clear as it states " Fast Track, Breakthrough, or both."

  • Reply to

    The News We've Been Waiting For!

    by cosaman Sep 15, 2015 4:44 PM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 15, 2015 6:12 PM Flag

    Go to NVAX web site, read news releases for 2014 there you will find info. about primates and maternal placental transfer of antibodys.

    You must be short or working for tutes trying to lower pps.

  • Reply to

    Don't be fooled

    by surestockholmes Sep 15, 2015 7:46 AM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 15, 2015 5:42 PM Flag

    From FDA Dot Gov.

    "Fast Track and Breakthrough Therapy designations are designed to speed the development of promising new drugs intended to treat serious conditions with unmet medical needs. Almost half – 19 or 46% of the 41 novel new drugs approved in 2014 — were designated as Fast Track, Breakthrough, or both."

    I would give it a 50 / 50. When full data set is released for p2, I suspect the approval probability or odds to increase.

    From FDA web site they have approved a higher percentages in 2014 than past years. The tutes know this and they want all retail shares.

  • Reply to

    Don't be fooled

    by surestockholmes Sep 15, 2015 7:46 AM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 15, 2015 12:31 PM Flag

    That is so true pat............. they can not hide the volume

  • Reply to

    Don't be fooled

    by surestockholmes Sep 15, 2015 7:46 AM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 15, 2015 10:15 AM Flag

    Lets keep this close to the top so shorts and manipulators can not bury the FACTS

  • surestockholmes by surestockholmes Sep 15, 2015 7:46 AM Flag

    Nov 20, 2014
    U.S. FDA Grants Fast Track Designation to Novavax' RSV F-Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine for Protection of Infants Via Maternal Immunization -

    Now ask yourself would the FDA Grant Fast Track if they (FDA) didn't see positive data.

    Oct 29, 2014
    U.S. FDA Grants Fast Track Designation to Novavax' H7N9 Influenza Virus-Like Particle Vaccine Candidate Adjuvanted With Matrix-M(TM) -

    Sep 08, 2014
    ICAAC Presentation: Immunization of Pregnant Baboons With the RSV F Nanoparticle Vaccine Protects Infant Baboons Challenged With Respiratory Syncytial Virus in a Comparable Manner to Infants Prophylaxed With Palivizumab -

    It is all there on NVAX website 2014 news, when in doubt go back and read. I think posters have been planted on NVAX msg. board to create doubt and scare retail out of their shares.

    To the short term flippers just say NO remove your stop / loss orders stop the day trading and watch the pps rise. When there are no more shares to steal they buyer will be forced to bid the pps up. I have been adding on these pullbacks on low volume. For each dollar they pull it back I add.

  • Reply to

    Maternal rsv

    by lhcir Sep 14, 2015 6:21 PM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 14, 2015 7:52 PM Flag

    Ihcir .......... Bingo Thxs. I was looking for that tid bit of info.

  • Reply to

    The unexpected

    by stockalias Sep 14, 2015 4:02 PM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 14, 2015 7:46 PM Flag

    cosaman that is also the way I understand it. I am confident there are others here more knowledgeable in the field than I. Perhaps they will share their knowledge.

  • Reply to

    The unexpected

    by stockalias Sep 14, 2015 4:02 PM
    surestockholmes surestockholmes Sep 14, 2015 7:44 PM Flag

    stock........I have not seen any data from NVAX regarding animal studies involving VLP-RSV antibody placental transfer. If others have please give a link. However I would have to think NVAX has completed some in vitro or animal studies, otherwise no reasoning for expensive trials, on a total unknown. Therefore I must assume such studies have been completed, with positive results. There have been human and animal studies with other VLP's, that produced positive results.

    There is data that supports maternal vaccinations for Pertussisl which is a highly contagious respiratory disease. The data supports the transfer of antibodies from mother to the unborn infant.

    However we must remember Pertussis is a bacteria (organism) induced respiratory disease, where as RSV is a virus (via RNA) induced respiratory disease, different mechanisms. So it is not a direct apples to apples comparision. There have been other maternal studies that show promise for viral diseases and the placental transfer of antibodies.

    I am not a virologists, bacterologists or immunologists, so my words may not be 100% correct.

    NVAX needs to give up some more data which may happen very soon. There is a reason so many tutes have so many shares and somebody keeps walking the pps down on low volume. If this were a high volume sell-off I would be more concerned. Somebody wants the retailers shares.

19.44+1.04(+5.65%)Oct 2 4:00 PMEDT