Wed, Jul 9, 2014, 10:12 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Silver Wheaton Corp. Message Board

swarmshepherd 23 posts  |  Last Activity: Jun 26, 2014 8:31 PM Member since: Apr 30, 2013
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    SEC From 4 just posted

    by darth_trader_92660 Jun 23, 2014 10:49 AM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Jun 26, 2014 8:31 PM Flag

    darth,

    when I go to OTC board and count down a few buttons I see "Short Sales" for LQMT,
    they are listed for Jun 13, 2014 at 547,125 shares - not much.

    fyi - I don't know or care or think you are short, but if you are really going to continue to try and play the "resident expert" role here, you oughta have your really basic facts straight?

    Somebody I know that is doing all his own basic research, modeling different scenarios, and getting down first hand to the financial nuts and bolts and details of patents and such - and he has become more and more excited, not less over the last weeks. Whereas you insist that there is no money to be made from AAPL he has concluded that AAPL would have to at least buy the material from Materion and there for would be paying LQMT some sort of royalty that way. You claim the opposite. I'd like to 100% get to the bottom of this one.

    And :) BTW I looked up that Mercedes model - it looks alot like the one my dentist drives - why not? Seems to me to reflect SOLID GOOD TASTE and appreciation for Excellent World Class Engineering. Would not want him picking up Engel executives at airport in an old pickup truck? :)

    Swarmii

  • swarmshepherd by swarmshepherd May 28, 2014 4:07 PM Flag

    overheard: yoda to darth :)

    News solid.
    Type millionaires buying keep.
    Type retail their pennies make, and gone they are,
    or must chase,
    Sad it is, not more millionaires made,
    just millionaires transforming to billionaires
    more the case,

  • Reply to

    Recent financing - from the 10Q

    by darth_trader_92660 May 8, 2014 11:25 PM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd May 9, 2014 8:23 AM Flag

    Darth,

    What am I missing? bottom line: From conference call: Cash totaled $7.0 million at March 31, 2014, as compared to $2.1 million at December 31, 2013. Now 389M shares - so about 8% dilution rounded out.
    That really not terrible, in fact that's almost seems low in this phase. Folks are going without salaries on the board, costs are being controlled pretty well, I'd say....

    AND they are now going to have twice as many machines! That's one machine for every 9 employees. Think about it... :)

    Yes, some dilution, but they are moving the ball along and taking care of business with a very strategic hire and so on. I'm gaining confidence that they getting set for good things to come...

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    Hoping for real news from LQMT

    by wallst_hawk May 8, 2014 9:49 AM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd May 8, 2014 3:23 PM Flag

    Hey Darth,

    We are looking at records that show Visser controlling only a little over 19M shares. Where do you get 100M?

    _swarmii

  • Found some good current info using google for "Amorphous Metals" with mention of LM. Also a link to a LM to a recent 14 Page (PDF) Design Guide with many good images that I found most interesting.

    I'm getting psych'd to double down if the price should drop to 15 from this lofty level :)

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    IWatch Yes or No

    by bob10697 May 1, 2014 11:48 AM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd May 2, 2014 3:15 PM Flag

    darth,

    I think I understand that LQMT would make some money on Apple by way of the costs of the material itself? How do you understand this? (I'm not as hung up on whether or not Apple uses LM in their products as many board members here seem to be, of course for PR / public exposure it would be great.. For me it is the pct of those 28 (?) prototypes that eventually become real products / revenue streams that I'm going to be very very interested in. I dipped a toe in at 0.18 but will double down at

  • swarmshepherd swarmshepherd May 1, 2014 5:12 PM Flag

    Apple has continued to invest in the LM technology over a period of years. THIS MEANS (to me) that they have seen, felt, drop tested, soak tested, consumer tested, and whatever.tested the heck out of a series of materials and have maintained and continued their interest in LM.

    YOU can read whatever you want into that, for me it is another good sign, one of more than a few...

    _swarmii

  • Reply to

    LQMT to be used in Turbans

    by oilly2bed Apr 30, 2014 11:53 AM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Apr 30, 2014 2:15 PM Flag

    Yes!
    And here's the Link: https://mbasic.facebook.com/siriusxmliquidmetal?v=feed&refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fmbasic.facebook.com%2Fa%2Flanguage.php&_rdr

    ;)

  • Reply to

    Reconnecting Nerves - Whoops!

    by swarmshepherd Apr 29, 2014 3:21 PM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Apr 29, 2014 3:38 PM Flag

    No I don't know who owns the patents but I put a call in to "Otis" and perhaps they will be interested enough to return my call and comment on this, as their use of the (translated) word pair "Liquid Metal" is clearly misleading AND because it is Not entirely impossible that "our" lqmt has some overlapping "interest" - perhaps from the old original research program days, that something was done in this area that they might have (some) rights to?

    (I've been wanting to call them to see if the phone is still connected :) it was, but a recording, could be interesting how / when they reply? )

    _swarmii

  • swarmshepherd by swarmshepherd Apr 29, 2014 3:21 PM Flag

    Sorry,

    I thought the original post was a scam so I was excited to find an actual authentic appearing article of any sort but I was not 100% sure that the phrase "Liquid Metal" used in the article referered to any of the LQMT patented metals. Only read the article only very quickly before posting. Now I read more carefully and
    find that:

    It is is 'almost certainly" NOT "our" liquid metal as they say: Biomedical engineers have been eyeing the liquid metal alloy gallium-indium-selenium for some time (67 percent Ga, 20.5 percent In and 12.5 percent Se by volume). This material is liquid at body temperature
    ================================
    and is thought to be entirely benign. Consequently, they have been studying various ways of using it inside the body, such as for imaging.

    So sorry, should have read carefully before posting....

  • Did some googling on this and indeed there is a genuine article out there. I'm not kidding, here's the link:

    http://www.technologyreview.com/view/526946/liquid-metal-used-to-reconnect-severed-nerves/

    Starts with:
    Chinese biomedical engineers have used liquid metal to transmit electrical signals across the gap in severed sciatic nerves. The work raises the prospect of a new treatment for nerve injuries, they say.
    ......
    and ends:
    .....
    So it’s just possible that liquid metal will become an important component in the treatment of nerve injuries in future.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    @ DARTH - YOUR TAKE?

    by rmkuhn22 Apr 24, 2014 10:36 AM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Apr 25, 2014 2:35 PM Flag

    This is GOOD info BUT it does not seem to impact, the, in my opinion, much more important material(s).characteristics/technology/process adds some real value or it does not.... and I happen to think that does. If and as new products slowly get lined up and into production many things will happen: the material will get less expensive, much will be learned to improve the process, materials science will advance... making more and more applications possible.

    to summarize, good to have the lowdown and this kind of info on a company, it clearly provides some limited insight on the past, but I do not see how it is at all a part of "materials battleground" of costs and benefits analysis going on now for, I assume right now, dozens of trial applications.

    swarmii

    Sentiment: Buy

  • swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Apr 23, 2014 4:36 PM Flag

    Darth,

    Having 19 empolyees and one machine might seem a bit odd at first, but given: :

    1. Management, R&D people, and sales people hardly belong doing production

    2. Not too many hours on the machine are needed by R&D

    3. As I understand things they (superficially) the LQMT model does not call for them
    doing the actual production, but rather to assist all along... in return for license fees.
    (Not sure at all how these are structured and who owns the mold and so on...)

    So given all the circumstances 19 employees and 1 machine does not seem wrong
    at all... your thoughts?

    Sentiment: Buy

  • swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Apr 17, 2014 12:21 AM Flag

    Hmmm, just thought about bicycle frames and maybe some of the components! Folks are charging and paying a fortune for latest and greatest frames and various mechanisms with favorable characteristics. Seems like a great experimental "playground" for new materials/mfg processes?

  • swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Apr 17, 2014 12:08 AM Flag

    Thanks Darth_,
    This gives me some new ideas to play around with. Need to keep digging & thinking on all this.

    I was thinking more old school, and bigger stuff that I have worked with. I was excited as heck about the Pontiac Fiero design concept of frame and panels back when. Could anything like those plastic body panels be molded with one of the LM alloys? Could such a thing make sense? Could the panels be strong and still so thin to actually save weight?

    I must learn, maybe, to think smaller.

    Swarmmi

  • Hi All,

    New here. Still doing my DD even while I have begun to dabble.

    Could somebody help me with the following 'gedankengang' (thought walk):

    Okay, usually, as an engineer, we are trying to determine the ideal material and process for a potential
    product. (And usually we want it to fit with existing process equipment, materials... so if we are going to change /try something new we have to be pretty excited about something like total program cost saving while using a superior material.)

    As I am trying to evaluate the various possible niches (beyond $7,000 watches :) ) for the new
    alloy and its "default" process - I guess injection molding. The size of the products are therefore
    limited by the capacity of the mold for the Engel machine just now.

    given: (from Engel):

    Our current machines are designed for 100 gram shot charges per cycle. Since LM001B has a density of 6.0 g/cm3, the current maximum alloy volume is 16.7cm3.

  • swarmshepherd by swarmshepherd Feb 14, 2014 5:20 PM Flag

    BRAKEOWWWWW!!!

  • Reply to

    SILVER INVENTORIES AT 17 YEAR HIGHS ON THE COMEX

    by trinfin1 Jan 9, 2014 11:47 AM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Jan 9, 2014 10:52 PM Flag

    Found this link for Silver Inventories... http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-08/silver-inventory-reaches-16-year-high-after-worst-rout-since-81.html

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    RSI and MACD

    by frankyassissi Dec 9, 2013 12:50 PM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Dec 9, 2013 1:13 PM Flag

    I like the sound of a "wound up MACD" - not sure how it drives the price of Silver which SLW seems correlate with - but then less messy than reading entrails :)

    Found this FYI:
    Developed by Gerald Appel in the late seventies, the Moving Average Convergence-Divergence (MACD) indicator is one of the simplest and most effective momentum indicators available. The MACD turns two trend-following indicators, moving averages, into a momentum oscillator by subtracting the longer moving average from the shorter moving average. As a result, the MACD offers the best of both worlds: trend following and momentum. The MACD fluctuates above and below the zero line as the moving averages converge, cross and diverge. Traders can look for signal line crossovers, centerline crossovers and divergences to generate signals. Because the MACD is unbounded, it is not particularly useful for identifying overbought and oversold levels.

    Note: MACD can be pronounced as either "MAC-DEE" or "M-A-C-D."

  • Reply to

    Long View on Silver price (5 yrs)

    by swarmshepherd Dec 6, 2013 2:38 PM
    swarmshepherd swarmshepherd Dec 6, 2013 3:08 PM Flag

    Complimentary to a longer view, to my thinking anyway, are the facts related to actual mining costs. Clearly the price to produce an ounce of silver does not mean the market price cannot go below this price, however given enough time mines will halt longer termed expensive activities, and weak mining operations will be shut down.

    Before I invested in SLW I researched what I could find on what it costs to produce silver and I thought I found a very useful seeking Alpha article that told me what I hoped to learn: there's been cost inflation and the current costs are great than $20 for all but a few mines (my words).

    Discussion about what the price of Silver "should be" in the longer term seems to be missing
    here.

    I'm a longer term investor, I'm not ready to sell if I'm up 10%, I'm looking for 30 - 40 percent before I drop any again - if I can see or/ find evidence that this what I think is what is going to happen within the next 2 years or so.

    Swarmii

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

SLW
27.11+0.34(+1.27%)Jul 9 4:03 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.