LOL...."The Gabriel app however is not well known."
VHC is suing companies for a product they can't even give away. The CEO would apparently rather buy a luxury box and a plane than advertise his Gabriel product. Any judge can see right through this worthless patent troll. They're going to zero and rightfully so....
It's sad, but VHC has no chance in this court system. Everything is stacked against them. You get a patent approved and then have to defend it from every Tom #$%$ and Harry the might want to contest it. Even if the patent doesn't affect them. Our system is horrible and VHC and many shareholders will pay the price
I said yesterday would be meaningless, and it sure was. Now, it's probably 3-9 months until the judge rules. If by some miracle he rules in VHCs favor, then we have another potential 2-3 years of AAPL appeals. It would be a miracle if VHC makes it through this before going bankrupt. I can't see how they can possibly survive.
jansy, for some reason decarlo has said June 10th for the judge's ruling so often, that he now believes it to be true. These rulings typically can take 3-6 months. Given the size of this judgement, the judge will probably use all the time he can. I think a ruling will likely come towards the end of this year or beginning of 2017. In the meantime, the PTAB or SCOTUS could ruin all VHC long's party and issue rulings that would be negative for VHC. No matter what happens, AAPL will be filing more appeals, so this isn't going to end for at least a couple more years. VHC will be broke by then.
They must be frothing since the stock is over 5. They can't resist so they're starting to short earlier than normal. Once again, the shorts thank KL for doing nothing.
peeby, it's always "next year' with VHC. I guess you haven't been around the past 6 years or you'd know that. They usually say it will be $100 next year. You need to get with the program.
We all know how this ends. By 2:30 the stock will be down under $5 and by 4 PM it will be red. With everyone expecting this to be a big up day, the market always produces the opposite. Worse yet, this is VHC, where it always pays to go short.
Shorts are being handed another gift today as the market makers are letting it float higher so they can get their short customers in at a nice price. This happens over and over again for the past 5 years and there's always suckers around to buy this junk. Amazing.
decarlo is just fantasizing that the judge will give some sort of ruling on June 10th. He came up with that date himself. The truth is, the judge will likely give his final ruling from from 3-9 months after May 25th. That is reality
As I said, it works every time without fail. Especially when you're up here in the nose bleed heights of almost $5 per share. It's overvalued by about $4.60 at that point, so shorts know it's a no-brainer to short it essentially without any risk.
10K share lots and higher being shorted. I said this would happen. It's automatic. The most sure thing there is in the market. This will close red today, there's no doubt. Shorts simply sucked in a bunch more longs to run the price up so they could short a bunch before the meaningless court meeting on Wednesday. That's all this move was.
That's exactly what they do. Now you're catching on. Once they suck in another round of gullible longs, they'll add their shares short and down we go. This has only been going on for 5 years. If you don't believe it, go ahead an buy some shares long here and then come back and tell us how much money you lost today. Because you will lose.
akoy, Wednesday is absolutely meaningless. They go in front of a judge to present arguments....yet again. Our judicial system is a complete joke at times. How many times does VHC have to prove itself? Based on this, there's nothing new on Wednesday except to hear AAPL argue for a new trial. What this means is that Wednesday is meaningless and they you will wait another 3-6 months for the judge to issue rulings. After that, we start all over again because AAPL will appeal given the very slim chance that it loses this case.
The shorts are allowing the stock to float higher so they can load up. They've been playing this game for years and the longs keep falling for it. We all know it's going straight down from here. The shorts will allow it to get near $5 so they can load up, but they'll never let it break fight. Automatic short with essentially no risk when you short this stock near 5.
KL might not even be aware of May 25th. He may have to go to the stadium to renew his skybox lease or something, which is probably far more important to him.
Like I've always said, when this junk goes green, just short it. Looks Like quite a few were able to add short to this garbage in the last 15 minutes of trading. Great adds for those able to grab more short shares.
joey, you are missing the whole point. AAPL won't have to win in court. They will win at PTAB, CAFC and SCOTUS. Plus, the judge is going to severely reduce the award from AAPL that VHC won. In fact, don't be surprised if he doesn't just throw it out entirely. Nobody likes a patent troll and especially one like VHC who has a CEO who gets nothing accomplished outside the courtroom, which is really the glaring problem for VHC.
teddy, see my point. Spec is a good example of a long with glazed over eyes. They don't care the stock went from $42 down to $1.90 over the past few years. They worship this CEO for everything he has (NOT) done. The guy promised everything under the sun to shareholders all the way down to the stock lows, which isn't very far from where we are now. Yet these longs support him all the way and criticize shorts as if they were the ones that caused all these problems. Again, be careful because this company isn't likely to survive as AAPL is going to appeal them into bankruptcy. It's as clear as day.
teddy, just be careful. The CEO is more of a snake charmer than anything else. He promises lots of things and delivers on nothing. These longs follow him with glazed over eyes. Secondly, VHC doesn't stand a chance against the PTAB and SCOTUS and any of the other patent organizations. So, even if they make it by them, no judge is going to award a pathetic patent troll such as VHC a dime. They don't stand a chance. In fact, most of their patents are rule not valid. It's just a handful in the AAPL case that are rule valid....at least to this point. They have everything going against them.
lolol....wow, you must be new to the stock. The funny part of your post is at the end, when you say "...and will hopefully finish by years end." Two things are extremely funny about that very naive statement. First, if VHC doesn't see any money until the end of the year, they're finished. They won't survive. KL won't be able to sell more stock into the market because who will buy it? Secondly, this must be about the 6th year in a row where "we should know by the end of the year." It's always the end of the year. Way out there just so investors stay in the stock and have some hope. However, it's never worked yet and I doubt it will work this time either.
wine, not true at all. My rants aren't because I hate the CEO. I would want to crucify any CEO that continues to lie or mislead shareholders and never get anything done. In addition, he gives himself and his family gobs of money and spends lavishly on things like his skybox, etc. All this while the stock is in the tank and while staying quiet and hardly ever updating investors. If you can like someone like that, then he's your guy.