No one got bonuses then elk - but your jaded bias just won't let you see that we all benefited from the bail out. There is nothing stopping any of us from working on WS, but ya better have the balls for it.
Not at all what I'm talking about elk and you know that. The bail out was to save the system from total collapse which would have hit main street as well. Ya want to talk about systemic risk that put us in that position, fine, start another thread, but that risk is just one more reason why investment and dividends should be taxed at a lower rate.
I only learned of this company a bit more then 2 years ago Keep and at that time they had no revenues nor did they have any prospects for revenue. They hadn't even started the phase I trial. read any of my ealry posts on this - speculative and all or nothing.
Yeah, I want to hear your tune when you have to pay an earned income rate on dividend and investment income. For most people the money you invest has already been taxed. And if you lose money you get a tiny offset to your gains. I want an economy that rewards investors and risk takers.
I'm not lecturing. I'm just asking why you expect revenue from a comapny that has no product. Answer for that?
Re the revenues, just a WAG but could that be because they don't have a product!?
In their 20 years have they ever had significant revenue? When you bought this stock 3 years ago you should have know that for 17 years they had no revenue and were just entering phase I trial. If revenue was important to you why did you invest in a developmental state company?
They can't release the fecking news on their own! And, as management has said, they are preparing a paper for a peer review journal for when they can release the news. Why can't you understand something so basic?
"The 20/400 to 20/40 patient is either a great breakthrough or a myth" A myth? So are preparing to argue that Lanza is a lier, since you so often write about his "leak".
And again you need to be reminded that this is a phase I trial.
FOS #$%$ wannabe. Remember you sold weeks ago. Laughing in your face.
Your ignorance is boundless. Look at the recent proxy filing by the BTX subsidary - its what I told you years ago - another way to dilute. Seems West did learn something from his time at ACT - Set up a bunch of subsidaries and let them do the dirty work. Oh, and how are BTX's stem cell trials going?
"As far as Fannie and Freddie were concerned, Bush never cared about regulating them and did nothing to bring that about."
This is how I know you are FOS in general Elk - I had a front row seat to the fannie/freddie debate and you couldn't be more wrong
Once again ya can't blame the financial collapse on Bush - Point to something that he did to cause the collapse? Was it Bush that signed financial deregulation? No, guess who? Bush wanted to reign in fannie and freddie and was rebuffed by congress - but by that time it wouldn't have made a difference anyway.
As for the war, you never answer the question as to what course should have been taken in the CONTEXT of the precieved threats directly following 9/11.
Elk - I'm not misrepresenting anything. That 10% for some states is a huge increase in their budgets and as I pointed out in my first note, states must balance their budgets so they will need to raise the revenue from soewhere.
If senior officer and key person leaves a company it is a material event and the company would need to file an 8k.
"My understanding is if the States accept Expanded Medicaid for the poor Federal funds would be made available to assist in the cost. States have very little to lose to cover the poor under this plan. "
The federal assistance is limited in duration and percentage of cost so at some point the states will be required to pick up the tab.
Fine easy, but the small business owner has to have some wealth to create the business to create the jobs.
You must be a Libroid Dem the way you're trying to walk this back - no you've been pretty clear in what you think will happen and why. Just cause you didn't say 100% doesn't change things.
While I've never agreed with the mocking tone of that statement, what it implies is true - most jobs are created by small businesses and if you suck the life out of them with taxes and regulations they won't continue to create jobs. To create jobs you need capital and that implies wealth - plain and simple. As for your farm subsidy example, look how many people scam that including many Hollywood elites who own farms just for the subsidies and tax write offs.
Ya just have to laugh - you have no idea what Langer's qualifications are to run a company, yet you are so certain that he is the solution.