Why is this basic stuff so difficult for you to comprehend? In an industry that is trying to find credibility, all good news is significant.
I agree there are distortions on both sides and while I wouldn't commit any new money to this right now, I sure wouldn't short it either - know what I mean?
I agree it's tough to defend the performance of this company, but folks like you distort and manipulate things which draws into question whether there is any objectivity in your assessment of the company. So yes there were adverse effects in the studies but they were not related to the cells. Second, while the 98% figure is correct, that doesn't mean current investors have a 98% loss - I surely don't and if the company ever succeeds that number will be irrelevant. Third, were did Lanza say no possibility of a product until at least 2020? Again, you stretch his words a bit.
You're being misleading again Smit.
"6 of 18 in the micro-micro "trial" had SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS- just that alone might sink this wet dream."
Not related to the cells but the procedure. Important piece of information that you so cavalierly leave out. There are plenty of legitimate issues with this company that ya don't need to create anymore.
What about clinical or developmental stage company did you find confusioning when you decided to invest? Those words mean something.
Are you down 98% keep? You sound like an idiot parroting others. When you invested in the company they had already had the same track record for 16 of the 20 years, and had not even started their phase I trial. What were you expecting?
Paid? Doubtful. No one would pay for his rubbish. He's at best a Smit parrot. He bathers about 'sheep' but has no idea what he's talking about. Proof? Just read his note about what a $10k investment inTSLA would now be worth - if that alone shows he has no idea what he's talking about nothing does. Funny too that the idiot rainman agreed with him.
How utterly stupid you are keep? Ya keep chirping about voting against the increased share count - as if that's some kind of smart solution - but then have no real solutions for the implications of what you suggest.
And how could it be too late to sell the company you buffoon? It's a debt free company, cash strapped with good IP and the only company in a phase II esc trial. Of course it could be sold. None of us would like the price they could fetch for it but toxic? Stupid.
And you believe that dilution is worse then BK? Explain that one?
There's two nonsense posts.
rainmanshere • 1 minute 8 seconds ago
"otherwise everyone would sell, and they are not"
Nobody wants to buy and end up with dead money or broke.
Never said they had revenue fool, just pointed out another moron who says they sold dolls. How stupid can you be? Oh, and too funny that you removed your post agreeing with the idiot keep's math on what a $10k investment in TSLA would now be worth - quite an eye for figures ya got there ya moron. Got find another hobby.
Silly keepea votes against increasing share counts but can offer NO alternative for how they would fund the company. Dilution may sux but BK sux more. He's a moron.