Keep, one smitforbrains is quite enough - not sure why you'd want to be emulating him.
To maintain objectivity, I don't think you'd want your lead investigator to have a financial interest in the outcome. Ethics 101.
In the next installment do tell what he did to you to get you so torqued up. Must have lost a boat load following this guy. Your obsession is bizarre. Must be a personal story. You seem pretty close - mother-in-laws money? Freak
Where did you find this? Some of the themes sound vaguely familiar.
"Shares outstanding = 2.96B, gross profit = $6.55M.est PE =15
($6.66M/2.98B) X 15 = $0.033 per share
current share price = $0.0001, therefore it's under priced by a factor of 330
It wouldn't take much to get this stock moving higher, but is there anyone still working at the company?
The last financials were back in 2010, Dr James Jing PhD was the CEO & President, and Philip Rauch was the CFO. And if there is no one running this comany how can the stock keep trading, as it's currently doing? Less"
Hey kry, better getting going with that Sch 13 filing. Wouldn't want you to have any problems.
Facts!? Re Lanza not being with the company give us anything even remotely resembling a fact. There's nothing to deny since all there is, is your schizo imagination at work.
"Boos, can you show proof positive that Dr Lanza is still at OCATA?" Did you learn nothing from the last time you trafficked is this rubbish and were made the fool?
". I expect that it has to fall into the 4's before someone thinks about buying it .". Your statement not mine keep. The point being that the stock doesn't have to be at any price for someone to make an offer.
And, yes I'm pretty certain that Lanza is still with the company. The company would have an obligation to make that public.
Keep the stock doesn't have to fall to anything for someone to buy. Anyone interested can make any offer at any time.
Yeah, keepeabrain its me with no business sense. So explain how describing specifically why the offering did not occur would help the company in attracting new alternative financing or in any way help the perception of the company? Give it a shot
What's freaky is your unbridled obsession with this guy and a stock you don't even own. Ya ever notice that no one other the you even knows the guy exists? He must have taken you for a truck loan of coin.
Standard boiler plate language keepea. Ya really think it would be helpful for whatever the company might try next to layout all the issues in fine detail? No business sense whatsoever.
It's just a little payback to the Charlatan who thinks he can do no wrong - he jumps all over others for this stuff. Nice to see you have his ar$e though.
So I previously asked you what you think the company would fetch right now. Come on, what's your number?
But you've voted against the proxy issues so as a shareholder you've voted against financing the company through dilution.