I get it newbie alias. Be the outrageous pumper to dissuade new shareholders. Think it will work?
Troubling me? Nothing. What's up with you and the doublespeak? Less than 8 hours ago here's what you said. "Bankruptcy or Indictments or both. All the darlings who wasted half a billion dollars have hidden in the shadows. Feeney remains to cut losses and cover everybody's butt. Letting strangers see their records would fill the courtrooms for years and probably a few jail cells. These people are pure unadulterated human vomit." Then less than an hour ago, you say this "Wave is golden here" No one reasonable approves, pal.
Starbucks closed hundreds of stores years ago and that's when you should have been buying. From their website Jul 01, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ: SBUX) has announced the next step in its multi-faceted plan to transform the company, with a decision to close approximately 600 underperforming company-operated stores in the U.S. market. Would you have liked owning SBUX for less than $20? I know and you know the obvious answer.
happy_wave you will fail to answer what I asked of you about an hour ago. Failure includes any variation of a reply that lacks clarity. Not so incidentally, your tenure at this message board is not difficult to uncover. You posted the following end of June 2001 5:11 PM:
$3.10---two slices of papa gino pizza = one share of wave. The economics of failure.
Now that WAVX is roughly one-third that price, I see your motive for being here as self-serving. How many shares short are you at this point in time?
Could that have been your short cover in AH, 4:07 PM, 2,000 shares? Maybe someone else. Not a fan of Nasdaq charts but while checking AH I did look at the 4 year high, over $18. I see no reason for WAVX to trade that high ever again. Given that I plan to hold my shares, can you expand on "Letting strangers see their records would fill the courtrooms for years and probably a few jail cells." because you're being vague. Aside from you not being entirely clear, shouldn't you do something more proactive than posting here? After all if you have evidence of criminal wrong-doing, your civic duty would or should motivate you to provide what you know to the authorities. Am I right?
Nothing uncommon about you methods. Lies and fabrication combined with derogatory remarks for anyone who may be a shareholder. The world would be such a better place without your kind.
Samsung would benefit. WAVX has 3 times it's cash relative to it's debt. Strong Buy!
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Strong BUY & HOLD
Sentiment: Strong Buy
brilliant or otherwise, no matter. Profitable yes. Buy some WAVX it's less risky than RSH.
I hold the opinion (OPINION!) that as the recent dig results have shown that the ore was better than expected, the further they go, the higher the grade. Core samples are what motivates them. Not expecting any 'mother lode' but I will continue to be a shareholder even if this goes over 50 cents.
Ask your self why you go through the effort of coining a new ID. Next question you should answer since you also posted,
"There is not an investor in the world dumb enough to take this press release seriously. Financially bankrupt and morally bankrupt."
With enough cash to repay debt 3 times over, instead of making new screen names, take a time out making new IDs. Learn about this company. Do not mislead. I am an investor that sees value in Wave's hardware approach to security. I see Solms capable of leveraging his past experience with Microsoft, Oracle and work at The Pentagon to benefit shareholders. His profile is available at LinkedIn. Should investors sell knowing Wave's Virtual Smart Card offering has been named winner of the Government Security News’ (GSN) Homeland Security Award competition in the “Best Smart Card Solution” category. The second consecutive year that Wave has won that award. They surely can do whatever they choose to do. I won't be selling.
Key Statistics, Balance Sheet
Same can't be said for how the US balance sheet has been heading.