End of week tree shake. They pop it at the open then take it into the red. If I'm right buy the dip.
Imposter with more than 500 messages and an alias less than a week old. All that bashing, all those messages, swirling the bowl. Now what?
What I see is an imposter, KERNSIXTY who hopes to appear to be k e m s I x t y. I see a new alias that is 3 days old with 466 messages. You live one sad life.
Good to see someone with measured reason posting. I agree, too early to tell if this is a real reversal.
Kinda obvious that next to no one is making money when shares are at historic lows. I mean who knows what happens here. Any new long is a risk taker, that's for sure. But back to your view. Are you in search of liars? I know a couple boards (SIRI & QTWW) where liars, instigators enjoy hogging. What of it?
Broad strokes with a very broad paint brush, meaning the historical past success is simply that. Standard Oil and it's anticipatory moves ahead of governmental regs, or same with AT&T, do correlate to your point about Malone. However, as with GM, the BK'd GM shares, had much to do with government being successful (to the negative) than with the CEOs running GM. And what of the steel industry or coal? The government has a undeniable role, a force to monitor in the sense it can undo it's target.
I've owned Sirius. Nothing compels me to re-own it. At least not at the current level nor in view of alternatives. I may be too old to fully appreciate the service. However, the people I speak to in their twenties, they aren't subscribers and their free listens did nothing to get them to be one. Howard Stern, I'll pass on that too. I suspect most young people see him as an old fogie. Whatever, you're here to extoll owning Sirius. You may have better luck convincing somebody else.
I'll give you a break, so to speak. I'm doing so because you have toned down the animosity a teensy bit. I'm not into your passive aggressive approach. I asked a simple question about certain "knowledge" you vaguely put to this board. You decided to talk in circles. Withholding the knowledge you referred to is all you're doing. Your choice. It's my choice to accurately depict your inability to communicate effectively. Asta la vista, baby.
She'll say anything to get elected or that sentiment has reason considering her ploy about her ethnicity. But do not rule out her becoming the next president. We, as a country move closer to Euro-socialism. And the Chinese need to be our banker, evermore buying our debt. 30 trillion debt coming? Count on it with a continued administration that favors socialism over capitalism.
People that answer a question in the way you have, do not find me asking them anything else again. But to answer your question, I don't care about however you are doing.
What Obama thought of himself Valentine Day, 2013, that arrogance, it's outright shameful. The weird thing about leftist thinking, it being so anti big business, how does a country prosper, long term, without big business? What small business can finance an airline, a railroad, a satellite communications network? IMO, it's impossible to lead the world economically without big business.
There will always be underachievers, there will always be people who expect more than they are worth. From what I've experienced over the past 25 years, more people than ever think nothing of accepting and striving for handouts. Years ago it was more than humbling, sure not so much humiliating to apply for unemployment but nothing to boast about in doing so. These days there are people that brag and laugh about being on unemployment. I find today's youth far less motivated to embrace the work ethic.