unkaphil, I am not saying misleading = lying. I am just saying there were people on here who were VERY factual about what would happen and it was 180 degrees from what RK said was going to happen. Lets just say misleading = not too bright at least this time around.
RK didn't see that the light at the end of the tunnel was a train until it ran him and us longs over.
rk remained arrogant well past the point of it being obvious to many. shame on him for misleading. that 3.22 was a quote in a CC, not sure exactly when it was
oh please. Pope was consumed with hiding his flock of pedophiles, shame on you for even mentioning such a disgusting group of people :(
So no one was mislead? Can longs say without whining that they were mislead? Is that NOT a fair statement to make? I am pretty sure even RK would admit to misleading shareholder. Now maybe he believed in what he was saying but really? how blind could he be for so long? "for those of you who don't have the ??? that's 3.22 dividend per share by 2020".
so yes longs were mislead, that 3.22 is down to 50 cents.
Reagan won the cold war. "Tear down that wall", do you recall that?
As fro GWB, no disagreement with that.
But how does throwing stones at priors make Obama any better? It doesn't. GWB bad. Obama bad. So? Hillary will be bad and even worse if she drags in Elizabeth Warren.
If the WWW in Slick's terms made enough to balance the national debt, then how can you blame Reagan? You make no sense.
Blame GWB, blame Obama, and really blame Slick for loans from banks to all people. Slicks easy loan program along with that old idiot greenspan is what sunk the economy, but you go ahead and blame GWB for it, I disagree. What I do blame GWB for is getting us into the middle east mess. But Obama has had 8 ! years to get us out, has he? nope.
Me vote for Obama, that's a good one. Never happened. Never even entered my mind. However I did stay quiet until he proved himself to be exactly what he is :(
How anyone could not find fault with this:
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government cannot pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies.
Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that, "the buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better."
~ Senator Barack H. Obama, March 2006
I don't agree. T uses more of its earning or cf for dividend than vz does but I own both so I like to hear what you're saying as T has always worried me more than vz.
41.14 -0.52 (-1.25%) you got a problem but at least you have that huge tmus divident