Because Pd is produced in many areas of the world where you cannot rely upon receipt of the goods, e.g., Russia and South Africa?
Any entity that needs Pd for its production processes should have an interest in buying this company.
The Warmer models say that there shouldn't be ANY ice in the North Atlantic. Wha' happened to the scientifically proven (as agreed to by 97% of all scientists) global warming model?
After all, methane is 30 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2. As soon as the Coals have been destroyed, the Greenies will then use the same Warmer tactics against NatGas. The NatGas producers are deluded if they think their "clean" energy will make them immune from the traitorous machinations of the Warmers.
Of course it's All American, dependable and safe! That's exactly why the traitorous Warmers and Greenies want to destroy it! LOL
The fewer humans involved in an enterprise, the greater the profit margins. This is actually good news for coal. The downturn in coal prices is the perfect excuse to get rid of Dem sponsored unions.
Those are all "outlier" data points, and can be safely ignored. Besides, they don't fit the model, so they can actually be discarded.
Well, I guess the Warmers in DC will just have to get used to more power outages.
Rand Paul will completely undercut the Warmer attacks on Conservatives by embracing the Warmer argument about human-caused climate warming - BUT, he will endorse the cheap, easily implemented carbon capture technology that has been developed by Lawrence Livermore Labs. Google "baking soda carbon capture."
Actually, there is a cheap and easily implemented carbon capture technology that utilizes simple baking soda. It was developed by Lawrence Livermore Labs. Google, "baking soda carbon capture."
The EPA will devise anti-fracking regulations, and will impose prohibitively expensive emissions controls on methane, a greenhouse gas that is 30 times more potent than CO2. The goal, of course, is to destroy the energy infrastructure of America, which currently provides cheap and plentiful energy to Americans.
Actually, the baking soda solution is pretty cheap and creates a solid that can be readily handled without a large danger of re-releasing the CO2. It beats me why the coal companies aren't promoting this technology to all their utility customers.
So, do a judo move, and use Mr O's own arguments to help save coal - by writing to the Board of Directors insisting that they adopt CHEAP, EASILY IMPLEMENTED CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY! LOL - Google "baking soda carbon capture"
Hey, that's not a bad idea - ACI could be had for a measly $250 million. Heck, the Sharks on Shark Tank could scrape that together themselves!
Google "baking soda carbon capture." Coal fired electrical generating plants could be compliant with EPA regs overnight - but someone seems to have missed this - I wonder why? LOL
ACI and the other Coals could even provide the devices free to utilities, and not suffer much of a cost - but maybe they're too stupid, or too short themselves... hmm? LOL.. Google "baking soda carbon capture."