"Maybe there's come cultural....."
That was funny. But seriously, how many USA high school grads are proficient in the English language? How many college grads? Then, if you are good with English, are you also savvy enough to understand and explain hi tech stuff? I don't think there is any cultural opposition. In fact, I would say the opposite is true. There just are not enough technical writers in the world. Usually the task falls back to an engineer or marketing application engineer or that sort of chap.
My dinner good toonite.
"a volatile asset".......You are completely out of your mind. TA is far less volatile than any other asset held by HPT. It is the foundation. It is the key building block. It is a cash generating machine during strong economies and weak. Look at the history of TA payments. I rest my case.
The only reason I own HPT is because of TA. I traded TA a few times in the past and simply got sick of all the money they were always paying to HPT. So, now I own HPT and feel great about it.
....Supply constraints also have the added benefit of shifting allocation percentages. So as long as Hutch has capacity, they will benefit. It would be nice to go from (for example), 50/50 allocation to 75/25.
And there is nothing quite like supply constraints to speed up quals on new and existing programs!
And there is nothing quite like .......to help raise prices at least a wee bit!
Well said. And from earlier Hutch cc's it was crystal clear that the program(s) they were qualified on at Seagate were at least a couple of the enterprise ones. For those who are intelligence challenged, those are the drives that go to the cloud market. Those programs continue to ramp quarter after quarter at Seagate. That said, hopefully Hutch is currently in quals on some of the other programs at Seagate as well.
cc, You are very likely correct. I really wonder if anyone actually reads the reports anymore. The Seagate report was a beautiful thing. Even the forward guidance was really good, but about $150,000 below analysts guesses......which is about nothing for a company selling several billion worth of product every quarter. The main driver for Seagate was simply some minor currency misses due to strong dollar and some weakness in retail Europe. None of this impacts Hutch because it is probable that the only programs Hutch is on at Seagate at this moment are some of the enterprise ones. That business is rock solid and is where all the growth resides due to the cloud storage move. Congrats on the 3.19 buy!
have their heads examined. VTSI is a great buy on its own merits. VTSI is also a great buy because it might be purchased by Taser. It would make a ton of sense, would be immediately accretive to TASR, and both corporate headquarters are only 20 miles apart! Yes, I own VTSI shares. It is worth 3X current price, strong revenue growth, very profitable, no debt, millions in cash, visionary seasoned excellent CEO, strong 10 year track record of profitable growth. Sorry this sounds like an infomercial. Do your research and make a decision. Cheers.
Saturation is decades away if ever. Just in my tiny Wisconsin, there are 72 county sheriff's depts. and another 600 - 800 city/village police depts. There are perhaps 3 cities capable of supporting a Modern Round. There are numerous (30?) large UW and private campuses and tech schools and police academies that could use a VirTra simulator. Multiply this by 50 states. Then multiply that by about 50 countries. Potential market is huge.
Then you have the whole recurring revenue stream from each purchase. Hardware upgrades, screen upgrades, software upgrades, and most importantly...scenario upgrades.
All that said, you raise a good point. With 158mil shares, even a 1/2Billion market cap is only a $3+ share price. This is why I feel SO strongly that EVEN NOW and ESPECIALLY NOW (share price still low) Virtra should be buying back and retiring shares. Even if they would only use $100,000 or so each quarter to do so, the impact would be ENORMOUS on several levels. Tells us their stock is a great investment. Tells the world it is a great investment. Says they care about shareholder value. Says the outstanding share count is ONLY GOING TO STEADILY DECREASE. Right now, $100,000 would take the share count down by 500,000 shares. This is significant.
I know there are some good arguments against doing this. My point is this is just one arrow in the quiver of many that need to be deployed to grow the company and share price.
Interesting theories and I am more in Hopeful's camp. The seller was small (relatively few shares), the seller was unsophisticated (used a market sell), the seller was sort of "spur of the moment" since there were zero shares listed at any ASK price between .1725 and .18. I think a guy with a 100k or 200k shares simply happened to check his VTSI stock and said...."holy s, decent price, I'm in the green, sick of holding for 2 years or 10 years, good bye shares". None of this really matters, but fun to speculate.
The one thing that has puzzled me about VTSI stock for many years now is why the trading volumes are always so low? With 158mil shares outstanding, one would think that avg volume would be at least 3mil every day. This is especially true now that the stock is starting to move. I would love to see a profile for the top 20 owners of this stock. Are they all old white retired golf guys living in AZ that have a few shares of VTSI as part of a huge portfolio so they just ignore it? I'm sure Ferris is at the top of the list with about 15million shares (at least I think that is the number, but not sure). And then I wonder why some sort of hedge guy or private equity guy hasn't latched on and driven this up to crazy high high's.
I often go through the exercise of figuring out what I think VirTra is really worth. Apply a Taser PS of 8-ish on 2015 revenue and you get $1/share. Apply a super conservative PS of 1 and you get 13 cents. I believe VTSI has sales of $20mil in 2015, EPS of 2 cents, exits the year with $3mil net cash and a very bright 2016 outlook. Seems to me that should be worth a PS of 3 which would be a 38cent share price or a PE of 25 which would be a 50cent share price.
Bottom line, 17 cents is still way to cheap for this company.
I didn't think it was humanly possible to type something as stupid as what you typed. You cannot possibly believe the slant you put on things. Please short the stock, as much as you can, you will be wealthy. Cheers.
BECAUSE IF IT IS THEN SOMEONE IS GOING TO JAIL. I have an email chain where I am told point blank that MadCatz has the exact same number of outstanding shares today as at the end of Q2. They also explicitly said the shelf has not been used. It was CRYSTAL clear.
You really do show your true colors with a garbage post like that. You know d well it is not Mad Catz selling shares. Why are you even here? You are not short, you are not long, you will never buy shares at any price. Whatever dude.
Everything you said made sense except your comment on TA. TA is rock solid and contributes more than its share to HPT. The only reason I own HPT is because of TA. It provides a solid foundation and is a cash generating machine with most of it coming back to HPT.
sgjerry, They are not and have not used the shelf. Insiders cannot sell until 48 hours after earnings released. Call or email CFO Karen and she will tell you the same.
The company name was on the screen several times....big letters at the end and behind the sales guys title. Doesn't really matter though because anyone who would act on something like this will take the effort to dig a bit. Anyone who isn't willing to dig a bit would not act anyway. It also seems more credible when it doesn't come across as an infomercial. I liked the intro and loved the fact that the scenario footage looked about the same as the real intro footage in many ways. Bodes well.
....maybe they finally figured out that it would be better to be trading at 40 cents when someone comes knocking on their door to buy them?
turn turn, The main point both Mei and I are trying to make is that we believe the sort of technology documented and described in the VirTra threat fire patent could be applied to some of Mad Catz's products to give them a HUGE advantage over rivals and help drive profitable sales. This has been discussed on and off here for the last couple years. But it ain't gonna happen.