Can hardly wait until $200 ... I want to Post ... Are we at $250 yet, are we, are we there yet, hello, $250, is it $250? Can hardly wait until $300 ... I want to Post ... Are we at $300 yet, are we, are we there yet, hello, $300, is it $300? Can hardly wait until $350 ... I want to Post ... Are we at $350 yet, are we, are we there yet, hello, $350, is it $350? Can hardly wait until $400 ... I want to Post ... Are we at $400 yet, are we, are we there yet, hello, $400, is it $400? Can hardly wait until $450 ... I want to Post ... Are we at $450 yet, are we, are we there yet, hello, 450, is it $450? Can hardly wait until $500 ... I want to Post ... Are we at $500 yet, are we, are we there yet, hello, $500, is it $500?
Every 20 working days since March 2009 the Federal Reserve has been stimulating the so-called 'economy' with various monetary tools that frankly nobody understands. Yes, I know several of you 'experts' will provide detailed explanations, but the bottom-line, you really have no idea what the nearly four trillion has been allegedly invested into. Nevertheless, back to the quiz. So, every 20 working days eighty-five billion finds its way into the bond and stock market. Now, eighty-five billion is the equivalent of EIGHTY-FIVE-THOUSAND INDIVIDUAL CHECKS FOR ONE-MILLION EACH. (One-Million times 85,000 equals Eighty-Five Billion.) Based upon the 2012 Census for Detroit, it would take slightly more than five months to give every man, woman and child living there a check for One-Million-Dollars. Okay, here's the test ... how long would it take to give every man, woman and child living in your state a check for One-Million dollars? A family of three, gets three-million and so on. Now, after you figure that out ... based upon the 'known fact' that 70% of the so-called 'economy' is the 'consumer'; what would the GROWTH of the economy be in FIVE YEARS compared with the GROWTH over the last five years if you were giving every man, woman and child One-Million dollars in America until you distributed FOUR-TRILLION? Would GROWTH still be essentially 2%? 4%, or would it actually be closer to 8%?
The mere suggestion last week by Janet Yellen that after five years of pumping 85,000 checks every 20 days for ONE-MILLION-DOLLARS EACH into the ONLY ECONOMY that exists after five years (Wall Street's Stock Market) that it is necessary -- going forward to 'improve the economy' -- continuing such policy is a blatant LIE under any measure you wish to apply. There is something much more nefarious, evidently bordering criminal activity and I assure you, IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SO-CALLED ECONOMY!
At the very least, it would slightly reduce the large number of completely idiotic promotional Stock Market advertisements.
What were you thinking, they were not ... too funny!
01. Thermo-Nuclear Detonation that takes out Germany.
02. Costal Tsunami that either wipes out Florida or California.
03. Another $50 plus billion bank fraud discovery.
04. CNN reports EVERYONE's Health Insurance is cancelled.
05. Iran attacks Israel with a nuclear chemical lased warhead.
06. Syria found lying and bombs Texas with Chemical Weapon.
07. North Korea assonates the head of the IMF and says they did.
08. The new World Trade Center falls down.
09. Fox News announces Obama found to have dementia.
10. Yellen says she has always been a man and is proud of it.
of course a medium low level nuclear denotation in a highly populated area would also be a strong buy signal too.
Yep, sounds about right.
... everyone is almost 'conditioned' now to see the Market go up everyday. When it does go down, those not positioned correctly will NEVER AGAIN in their entire live return. That may very well be the objective.
So how big of a lead have small caps gained over bigger stocks ... The Russell 2000 heralded as one of the larger cesspools in the market is ahead 27.3% vs. the S&P 500's 22.1% advance YTD. Over the last 5 years, the annualized advantage is 17% to 15.1%, and in the 14 years since about the time the tech bubble burst, the Russell has gained 8.4% annualized vs. the S&P's 3.8%. You cannot sell crack cocaine in a school yard an make that kind of return.
We are witnessing "a final gasp in small-cap leadership." Based on a number of metrics, the team estimates small stocks are trading at about a 40% premium to the S&P 500, as pricey as they've been in the "modern" era. They point out, Mexican drug Cartels and 'contractors' that sell toilet seats to the Defense Department do not operate on 40% margins.
I so badly wish somebody would have throw a shovel of cat#$%$ at her after that statement.
Estimates are meaningless just like the P/E's are, along with earnings and guidance any other so-called technical data point that has been used in the last 80 years. You want to make money here, just go Long the SPY or IWM or if you really want to make the big money, buy stock in a company THAT HAS NEVER MADE A PROFIT or HAD ANY REAL EARNINGS ...that's the fastest way to get rich!
or just the ones' that don't support Janet Yellen?