I thought all Yahoo stock boards are like this. anyhoo, I can answer the question. the republican agenda cannot be furthered by actual facts so cons have to use repetition and chants to push their agenda. think 'cult like'
"Just two years before the presidential election, the Census Bureau had caught an employee fabricating data that went into the unemployment report,"
See the problem with the Post 'article'. You read that as proof something fishy happened. Read it again slowly "he was caught". It doesnt say " he was told to fabricate". and the other source for the article doesn't seem to have a name.
hey remember when you silly clowns believed the president was born in Kenya. Yea, at what point do you realize that they continue to play you?
I like to sell covered calls and would love to sell them for half my NTI stake. I like to trim my positions with them. 27.50 would be in the sweet spot for such a move. In nov, there were calls available starting at 2.50 ( who buys those things ?)
I dont mean to rain on your Obama rants but whats the track record of conservative editorials telling you something is unconstitutional?
yea, I wouldn't really call a speech a 'comprehensive plan'. The fact of the matter is pubs were satisfied with the status quo.
how many of those had mandates? I know the Healthy Americans Act was supported by republicans and had mandates.
Just so you know, your puts still show up on yahoo finance when you look at the options for Jan 2016. Your "selling” of puts really seems like easy money. I just don’t understand the concept of someone paying a 33% premium to “insure” their stock for a little over a year.
Bush prances around the WH saying "dead or alive". Cons cackle with glee
President Obama gets OBL. cons yawn
If any of the silly cons here were actual investors they would know about the remarkable job President Obama is doing.
"Overly protective by not reporting anything negative on there 'love child'."
"next 'Black Lincoln' "
"wetting there panties "
"will go down with the ship "
Obama 'walks on water'
empty factless rhetoric. well, cons cant post any facts so of course they post empty factless rhetoric. . Everything is not a "librul conspiracy". You just believe every lie told you from the right and the only explanation for the media not covering it is a "librul conspiracy".
Serious question Fred, remember when your 'radio masters' told you President Obama was born in Kenya and his BC was fake? "Oh why wont the librul media cover that" the silly cons parroted". See my point.
true. the sad thing about cons is when their 'delusions' are burst, they create another delusion to explain it. In durett's world, reporters were 'lying libruls' the last 5 years when they wouldn't report the delusions and lies the conservative entertainment complex spoon fed him. When they finally have something critical to write about President Obama and they write it, instead of being proof that they simply report the news, he has to create the delusion that "they turned on him". Its sad that cons are so easily controlled.
"Journalists who once wrote glowingly about President Obama have turned on him "
As a con, you live in a world where 'writers' write what they are told to write. Actual reporters simply report the news. Its not a "librul conspiracy" that they wrote glowingly about President Obama. He did a great job. Now they are simply reporting the problems with the website and cancellations. someday you'll understand reality.......someday.
from a barron's article
"the reality is that benchmark Canadian Heavy crude oil prices (Western Canadian Select (WCS)) have unexpectedly blown out in recent weeks -- trading at a mere $54 per barrel. This represents an about $41 per barrel (or 43%) discount to WTI and a whopping about $51 per barrel (or 49%) discount to Brent."
this is pretty significant for NTI right?
you're confused sumry, I never denied President Obama said that. I guess because cons are always claiming facts are not true you just assumed that is what I was doing. I was simply adding context. Lets review
Bush handed surplus. doubles debt
President Obama handed largest deficit ever and worst recession in 80 years.
try to keep up.
the problem with your narrative is it requires you to ignore that Bush was handed a surplus and needed to raise the debt limit. President Obama was handed a 1.2 trillion dollar deficit and an economy with -8.9% GDP and losing 700,000 jobs a month.
see how your silly narratives cant withstand the slightest scrutiny. Its why you shouldn’t rely on bumper stickers as a source of information.
First off, putting “BIPARTISAN” in all caps in no way changes the fact that they are the Bush tax cuts and he’s responsible. You and yours were happy to take credit for them all along so it’s a little late to try to spin your way out of responsibility. Anyhoo, those with even the most rudimentary knowledge of economics know you don’t raise taxes or cut spending in a recession. And then you do it very carefully when recovering from a recession. So your “why didn’t they repeal the Bush tax cuts in the middle of the worst recession in 80 years” whine just belies either complete ignorance on your part or a lack of integrity.
And shouldn’t the people running around screaming in the middle of the worst recession in 80 years explain why then and only then they became concerned about balancing the budget and or paying off the debt especially since conservative policies caused the deficits?
I think you should go to a debate forum to posit your silly viewpoints. I recommend starting at a beginner one.
oh boy, another editorial that can in no way be verified from the people who claimed the President was born in kenya and wanted to kill old people.
Q2 had "Total throughput was 55,486 barrels per day for the second quarter" . If somebody could fill in the 'crack spread' data, it would be appreciated
oh silly con, of course its an improvement. And its an incredible improvement from Bush's record 1.4 trillion dollar deficit. anyhoo, you have to know its an improvement because your radio masters aren't instructing you to run around and scream about the deficit anymore. I believe you are being instructed to 're-scream' about Obamacare.