I did not say anything about small. I said we don't know yet. I was referring to all of the signed licence agreements and design win press releases that the insiders sold into .You really have to admit, that looks shady. Look around . There is nearly nothing to show for them. Do you really think they have enough money to last 2 years more for anything from Margnetti Marrelli to show up in the market ? Unless this turns on the HP revenue alone, they will have to dilute again . I bought into this 2 years ago with the potential. Management has failed to deliver . Its been a great stock for traders but a complete wreck for an investor.
What makes you think that this isn't more Bulls$$t fluff like everything else this company has been announcing for over 2 years with ZERO to show for it except for HP. We don't even know how much revenue they are going to receive from them yet. This is why the shorts are all over this issue and call the company a scam. Out of all the licencees they have signed there is nearly ZERO products to show for it . I tell you what . If the next earnings report doesn't show improvement I'm probably going to agree with the shorts. The next earnings call (IMO) is going to be crucial . They need to make an announcement that is going to make a difference. At $3.00 per share and loosing their index spot this has been a complete disaster !
It would be nice for this company to release news that would actually help support the share price. How about a computer contract ? How much longer"down the road" do we have to wait Gelbtuch ? I see the stocks in the crapper again.
Van, you still long or did you throw in the
towel on this frustrating investment? Just
curious since all the longs are burnt out. ..
I'm not a bag holder . Actually my average is $3.75 at this point. Hardly considered bagholder territory.. Lets come back here Christmas day and see who the bag holder is .. All I've said lately is that blatant lies were written in that SA article to tank the stock.. This is true..
And It would still be in the $4.00 range had it not been for that article of lies.. 2015 is going to be a huge year for Neonode.. The short involved in that article knows this. That is why he fabricated all that bull to ruin Neonodes reputation to cover before they get their next contract.. I can tell you this. If Neonodes computer screen solution works as well as the HP printers screen. They are going to make a fortune.. I'm loving my 8620.. Its quick and flawless..
Pump Stopper did have the right to state his opinion . Where he crossed the line is the unsubstantiated lies in several matters that are going to bite him in the a%s.. His problem and everyone else that backed him is being able to prove the allegations .. That is going to be impossible..
Did they fabricate several lies like the Pump Stopper before their rating ?
Remember about a year ago I mentioned on this board that the shorts would wash out everyone before going higher ? Well , looks like I was right . I just didn't think they would break the law to do it.. The market is a brutal place..
A little bird came out of no where and lit on my shoulder.. He said tweet tweet tweet Pump Stopper better lawyer up tweet tweet tweet.. Pump stoppers gonna take a pumping tweet tweet tweet..
Are you still going to believe that statement when they are legally able to admit an Apple car play connection ? I'm pretty sure that isn't a dying market..
Gotta hand to the shorts with that article. Right or wrong they sure nailed it . The stock is toast until if and when this company shows improvement.. Only time will tell now..
Name one tech stock or just about ANY stock in this market that is trading at fair value. Come on man, that dog doesn't hunt. It never has . Only in bear markets are stocks brought down to fair value..
So what you are saying is that its alright to provide a medium for a slanderous article of lies because you didn't write it? That SA is above the law when it comes to security violations ? We'll see..
The damage is already done but it will be more than the shareholders that will pay for this before its over. Scoverguy is completely correct. The SA article is not an opinion article as it should have been, it is fraud based on lies . I personally think the SEC should shut that website down. Nobody should be able to take a position and write an article for or against any company and profit from it. Its criminal ..