Tony Abott, the recently elected Prime Minister of Australia went out of his way to declare that man made climate change is 'total #$%$'
Finally, someone who knows what he is talkng about.
I am going to ask a huge favor of you. Could you please send me a list of stocks you are buying and a list of stocks you are shorting.
My plan is to short every stock you are buying and buy every stock you are shorting
I reckon, following this strategy, I will be a millionaire/billionaire within weeks
Thanking you in advance
I much as I admire the Met Office I they should have gone with the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus or space aliens rather the absurd idea that the deep oceans have some afinity for trapping heat.
Wow!!! If you take the Met Office seriously the water ten miles below the ocean surface must be boiling.
But what can the Met Office do? When you are faced with an absurd proposition, in this case global warming you have to come up explanations that are at best incredulous and at worst - insulting.
My question is, how many people of normal intelligence or even subnormal intelligence are going to take this latest Met Office explanation seriously?
You are absolutely correct, Senor jkwelli. I have much more faith in the predictions of esteemed meteorologists such as Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Barbara Streisand and Al Bore.
I wonder what senors and senoritas Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Barbara Streisand and Al Bore will be saying when we are in a prolonger period of global cooling. They will have to imitate Don Quixote and find another windmill to fight. They might even bring back a computer meltdown for the year 2020 or another Mayan end of the world scenario.
However, they will most likely switch gears and claim that CO2 is causing global cooling. Whoops, they have already down that. Global warming is now climate change. Global cooling fits nicely in the category of climate change.
Another question, do you think the hamster energy program would have a better chance getting Obama funding if we replaced the hamsters with donkeys.
The question is - why are we having smaller NG storage injections than projected. Is it because we are using more natural gas or is it because we are producing less NG.
I am not sure.
In any event, we will be piping about twice as much natural gas to Mexico next year as we are now. In about 2 years LNG exports start. Together, these represent 5-10% of NG production and are likely to increase.
Unless natural gas production increases we are in a world of hurt. Not enough NG for us. Prices for NG skyrocket.
The obvious solution is to increase NG production. How likely is this. Every mature NG field ie. Barnett, Haynesville, Fayetville has declining production. More than likely, the Marcellus will follow this path of declining production in a year or two. Throw in the fact that conventional NG fields have had declining production for the last 40 years and what do you have? Probably declining NG production and higher NG prices.
This is not going to be evident tomorrow, next year or next month but the myth of cheap and plentiful natural gas is going to be exposed in the coming years.
We have only one energy source that is cheap, plentiful and reliable. The name of that energy source is coal.
I wish you were correct. We could use a little global warming down here. the temperatures in Buenos Aires and Florianopolis, Brazil, have plummeted to lows never before recorded. We are freezing.
As much as I would like to believe your global warming nonsense I think history will show that the Russian and German meteorologists are correct. We are entering global cooling which will last for the next 200-250 years.
But then again. who should I believe. Serious meteorologists who are predicting 200-250 years of global cooling or should I listen to Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Barbara Steisand and Al Bore fantasizing about global warming.
Since you obviously have some influence with the inner circles of the Obama Administration - please pass along this suggestion.
Forget solar and forget windpower. Both total losers. Put a bug in their ear. Hamster power. We put super speedy little hamsters into tiny treadmills and run them non stop. My guess is that within several months we will produce more power than solar or wind has produced in the last 100 years
What do you think????
To make matters worse in mosambique the government will not allow coal to be barged out. Not because of environmental concerns. Because the the river is non navigational.
What's more, the coal is of much poorer quality than first thought. A lot of burnt coal and coal with high clay content.
you are correct about the Orencia royalties. However, upfront money and royalties from RGEN's drug products might dwarf the Orencia royalties
Also, RGEN is ramping down its research expenditures which are about the same dollar amount as royalties RGEN receives from Orencia.
Interesting that short interest in RGEN continues to rise. As of Dec 15 short interest in RGEN increased to over 2.3 million. The shorts may be able to cover at a lower price or the shorts may be forced to cover at a higher price. My guess is that encouraging news from any of RGEN's drug products will put explosive upside pressure, especially with short covering, on the share price of RGEN.
OK, I have seen the light. Trout is head on. Coal is dead. I am going to buy an algae powered sports car with a windmill on top today. Also, forget steel. No longer needed. Our bridges and skyscapers will be built with plastic.