Mon, Jan 26, 2015, 10:35 AM EST - U.S. Markets close in 5 hrs 25 mins

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

SPDR Gold Shares Message Board

votingmachine 39 posts  |  Last Activity: Jan 23, 2015 11:16 PM Member since: May 12, 2004
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    MCP now less than REE

    by coal_will_be_back Jan 23, 2015 8:09 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Jan 23, 2015 11:16 PM Flag

    Molycorp now has a lower market cap than Lynas. The current market cap is $69 million.

  • Reply to

    filing for BK on Monday

    by rob1darwin1 Jan 23, 2015 4:20 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Jan 23, 2015 11:14 PM Flag

    This doesn't make sense to me. You declare bankruptcy when you run out of rope. And quite clearly, there is still cash left, and no debt maturing that needs repayment.

    I don't have any idea what is going on. They could be looking into re-working the debt like the re-worked that last set. If the debt is heavily discounted, they might be looking at a some crazy plan.

    I don't know the debt trading, but I saw a comment here that it is trading at 15-cents-on the dollar of par value. That would make the price tag for the $1.6 billion of total debt something like $230 million. I think the 2016 debt load due is something around $200 million (after the last equity for debt swap, I don't recall the number). So that is trading in the market for $30 million.

    There simply isn't any reliable info. It could be that the rumors are right and Molycorp has burned thru all cash, has interest due, and bills to pay, and needs chapter 11 protection. That seems unlikely. I don't know what the debt relief they are trying to cram thru is. It does not seem likely that they are seeking debt relief via a bankruptcy at this time.

    But who knows ...

  • votingmachine votingmachine Jan 7, 2015 12:07 PM Flag

    No. Rare earths are incredibly small in actual amount. Say Molycorp wants to ship 1000 mt to China. Call the density about 2 (table salt is about that) g/cm3. That is 2 metric tonnes per per cubic meter. That's 500 cubic meters of volume. A standard 20-ft cargo shipping container will hold about 33 cubic meters and 14 metric tonnes. There are higher load containers, but even using those, it is only about 70 cargo containers.

    They probably are not shipping that much to China per month. There already is a problem in that more containers come in than go out (empty shipping back to China). So all you have to do is rail ship to an open port and it gets loaded and shipped really fast. Vancouver has been REALLY busy with other west coast ports off-line. Vancouver is about 2200 miles from San Diego. So shipping by rail would add $10,000-ish or about $10 per tonne to get to the furthest away west coast port.

    The logistics of moving stuff requires planning around obstacles like strikes, but the actual physical amount of RE's is small ... they just are high priced.

    And I think the densities of MCP material exports are higher than the table salt I used, and they can use heavier load cargo containers. I believe Mt Pass has a rail spur. At full operations they should be shipping about 2000 mt per month from Mt Pass. So they will probably be loading empty rail flat cars and shipping out a couple times per month. They could hit a bunch of the west coast ports pretty easily ... San Diego, LA, SF, Portland, Seattle, Vancouver.

  • votingmachine votingmachine Jan 7, 2015 9:17 AM Flag

    I think they have to deliver on the business plan. So far they have failed every quarter to make the expected progress. For a long time they keep reporting losses and projecting a future time when the operations are breakeven, moving to profitable. All of those suggested points in time have been missed.

    I'm going to keep holding this as a high risk stock. If they can deliver on the business plan, that fundamental change will drive the value of the company much higher. If they keep reporting losses, and don't deliver then they will go out of business.

    Q4-2014 is complete and probably is another big loss. The Q3 report was about 1.2 months into the Q4 quarter and they said that HCl costs were high in Q3 and that was continuing so far thru Q4. The plan calls for HCl generation on site, using brine and energy. With energy costs so low, that is an attractive plan. But in the transcript all they say is that they are still experiencing start up issues from construction related problems.

    Geoff Bedford: ...The program for chlor-alkali, the repair and refurbishment program, there is a capital cost to that or a maintenance cost of that; but it is really not material. We are thinking in the $3 million to $5 million range.
    ...
    With respect to the fourth quarter and the out-quarters, we really did make significant progress with chlor-alkali over the quarter. We have been able to get that production back online and we are seeing a much greater volume of HCl coming out of that plant.

    Michael Doolan: ... That not being the case ... not a significant impact on the overall cost structure. The big rise from the $16-and-change in Q2 to the $33 was unfortunately just the lack of volume through.

    So they need to reduce the chemical costs, and to increase the production rate, and hit the business plan targets, but so far, they are currently limited by the acid supply, which follows the other limits, which follow other problems.

    Progress would move the stock price.

  • Reply to

    Continued Listing Standards Notice

    by pbtoption Jan 2, 2015 9:23 AM
    votingmachine votingmachine Jan 2, 2015 1:21 PM Flag

    You are right. I had to go look it up. I was cognizant of the rules when I had a stock at delisting prices in the recession ... but they changed the rules during that time.

    The 30 trading day period ending on a calendar month end is an odd one. A simple 30-day trading period would make more sense as a rule. What if MCP traded at $1.01 for Jan 3rd to Feb 26th, but then closed at $0.99 on Feb 27th (end of calendar month)?

    As an exercise, there are 19 market days left in January ... the 5th to the 30th, minus the MLK holiday. So I think the 30 days prior is back to December 17th/18th. The average for the last 10-ish days is about $0.80. So 20 days at $1.10 average and a close over $1 would re-set the clock on January 3th.

    The Feb 27th close has a 30 market day window from Jan 16th (MLK holiday Monday 1-19).

    The rules look like they change to a simple 30-market day average if the company provides a plan. I believe it is a plan to just expect better results and better stock prices.

  • Reply to

    Continued Listing Standards Notice

    by pbtoption Jan 2, 2015 9:23 AM
    votingmachine votingmachine Jan 2, 2015 10:48 AM Flag

    I'm a bit surprised by the continued sub-$1 stock price. IMO, the company performance should be resolved in the next 6 months ... we should know if they will survive or fail in that window. If they are on a survival path then the stock price will be higher.

    I tend to look at the stock price as reflecting the odds. Odds on the long term, as well as the near term reporting expectations. The stock price indicates investors expect bad Q4-2014 numbers and don't expect much chance of the long term survival.

    I wonder if MCP will have a PR that basically pre-announces the Q4 range, as they have several times lately. Perhaps an update on Chlor-alkali operation with numbers on how low the production was with the expensive acid burden on costs.

    I think there is a good chance of a daily close over $1 prior to the Q4 report. And a single day with a close over $1 will reset the clock. JMO, but I am surprised at how low the stock price went, and how it has stayed low.

  • Reply to

    No Bids, sellers cant get out now

    by mcp_0 Dec 11, 2014 2:03 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Dec 12, 2014 9:47 AM Flag

    OMG, they did open the market today and there is still a process of bids and asks. You sure had us worried when the market was closed and no one could sell.

  • Reply to

    Lynas corp

    by mcp_0 Dec 11, 2014 7:01 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Dec 12, 2014 9:45 AM Flag

    Japan wants Lynas and Molycorp mines and businesses to operate. That has nothing to do with the stock prices. They might prefer that the companies went thru bankruptcy and new management operated them with the debt shed to default. Look at how airlines go bankrupt and you realize that the planes kept flying ...

    I think people take the world interest in non-China RE supplies as equivalent to interest in the success of stockholders in these companies. If you want non-China RE supply, you just care that the mines are run by someone. My interest is in the survival of MCP, not Mt Pass business operations.

    There is a billion dollar investment in RE processing at the Mt Pass RE source. I am interested in a return on investment, not a default, and the value going to the next group.

    The stock represents the value of owning the entire business, assets and debt. And some estimate of the future value of the business operations. It looks like the value of assets is less than the sum of the debts. The only way that the stock makes sense is if the business makes money. I haven't gone thru a liquidation calculation to see if there is residual value for the stockholders.

    I very much think that Japanese interests would let Lynas fail. The dominant interest seems to be the debt owed to lenders from Japan. They are probably ambivalent about whether they get repaid by Lynas success, or repaid by seizing the company in bankruptcy. Sojitz offered next to nothing when Lynas asked for more time. Lynas managed to sell stock, and make a necessary debt payment, only slightly late. Japanese debt-holders don't look conciliatory, like they feel they need to accommodate a non-profitable ownership and management group.

    I very much think that the debt-holders in secured positions are ambivalent about MCP failure. They can get paid in liquidation. Unsecured has to be analyzing it themselves, but the S&P has a pretty high risk for recovery as their (pseudo) analysis.

  • Reply to

    CCC+

    by soupkitchen44 Dec 10, 2014 5:26 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Dec 10, 2014 6:52 PM Flag

    That was my thinking also. They did not present a single bit of reasoning other than the equity swap indicated default risk by bondholders. That's not a ratings analysis, that is just reporting the price is low, so hey, must be bad news.

    Here, at least they take note of an additional amount of liquidity as being a useful thing.

    Maybe I didn't read it close enough, but IIRC all it really said was some bonds were sold REALLY cheap, and Molycorp wasn't buying back at par or with cash. That just wasn't enough information to male a downgrade conclusion.

  • Reply to

    Short Interest

    by pbtoption Dec 9, 2014 5:33 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Dec 10, 2014 3:20 PM Flag

    I can accept that characterization. The clarification I would offer is that the 49-0 game ended, and death is also a final ending. We agree that the future is not written ... I took death spiral as a conclusion. A death spiral ends in death.

    No doubt the news has all been bad.

  • Reply to

    Short Interest

    by pbtoption Dec 9, 2014 5:33 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Dec 10, 2014 1:06 PM Flag

    I don't argue this is a well run company. I argue that the business plan is simple enough to be run by ordinary people. It doesn't take Steve Jobs to run a mine. Dig up dirt. Process out the valuable parts. Sell the valuable parts. If you can do that for lower costs than revenues, it is a profit. So far Molycorp has not. And they have made MANY mistakes.

    But at the heart, the reason they lose money is that they dig up dirt, and spend too much making a sale-able metal/chemical, at the market prices. They are not hiding the plan: it is process improvement, to lower costs. They cannot hide the failure to deliver adequate progress on that plan.

    I don't believe I am unrealistically positive. I probably am being somewhat unrealistic about the ease of running an ore processing plant. I think it should be relatively easy. The fact that they keep finding "bottlenecks" is irritating, and a sign of poor design.

    But at this point I do think the plant is nearing the final operational status. They will soon determine the optimal operation, in production volume and in costs. The market clearly has a negative opinion of that final Project Phoenix outcome. And if it really can't hit the targets, then Molycorp will fail.

    I just don't read stock price charts. I don't see a death spiral, because I just see the price. If you have the talent of looking at the past prices and determining the future price ... "death", then more power to you. I don't. The price went down. I can use that price to calculate crude odds. But I can't gain information from the stock price ... it is just something I lack the talent for. The price is simply what I can buy at or sell for. I'm not happy with the stock price, but I can't say the declines are a death spiral. I lack that chart reading ability.

  • Reply to

    Short Interest

    by pbtoption Dec 9, 2014 5:33 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Dec 10, 2014 10:31 AM Flag

    That would be incorrect. Management has done nothing but say the company will survive.

    Stock prices eventually reflect the underlying value. There is a lot of risk and uncertainty with company that SAYS things like "cash flow positive by the end of 2014" and then does not deliver. If they deliver a cash flow positive result, then the value gets easier to understand, and the risk is reduced.

    It is highly inaccurate to say that management has said nothing to indicate the company will survive. And somewhat inaccurate to say they have DONE nothing to lead to the company survival. What they have done has led to survival so far, over the short term life of Molycorp to date (IPO in 2010). The long term survival requires profitable business operations, same as any other business.

    There is no death spiral. There is a market price for ownership of Molycorp. The market price of the stock seems to factor in a HIGH probability of bankruptcy, and a LOW probability of the target operational success.

    I don't think there is anything going on in the market. I don't buy any conspiracy theories about manipulation. I think investors have given up on Molycorp.

    Of course the stock price now offers a HUGE upside if the company does deliver the promised results. Any shift in operations to profits should drive the market cap back towards a few $billions, a 10-fold type of gain. You have to conclude that the market is giving odds of 10-to-1 against that scenario, with a current market cap of about $200 million. And naturally, the shorts are attracted to a company with high market odds of failure, and low market odds of success.

  • votingmachine votingmachine Dec 5, 2014 11:38 PM Flag

    You would have to look at the issues ... the PR's. There tends to be an official number for the offering, and then an oversubscribe number.

    For instance the $360 million:
    Molycorp, Inc. (NYSE: MCP) (“Molycorp” or the “Company”) today announced the pricing of its previously announced public offering of $360 million aggregate principal amount (or up to an aggregate of $414 million aggregate principal amount if the underwriters of such offering exercise their over-allotment option in full) of its 6.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017

    Looking at an old PR, the S&P number is right:
    Molycorp, Inc. (NYSE: MCP) (“Molycorp” or the “Company”) today announced the closing of its previously announced public offerings of $414 million aggregate principal amount (which includes the exercise by the underwriters in the offering of their $54 million over-allotment option in full) of its 6.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2017

  • votingmachine votingmachine Dec 5, 2014 11:32 PM Flag

    The point I was making is that the downgrade to CCC did not stop access. The downgrade to SD is relevant only if they need cash. They only need cash if they burn thru the exoisting cash with losses. If they lose that much money, they SHOULD declare bankruptcy.

    So I agree that capital access is cut off in the event of further losses. Capital access is cut off because they have fully mortgaged everything. And they still haven't operated profitably.

    If they make profits then they will have access to capital markets, for re-fi's.

    The S&P calling it selective default is mistaken IMO. The notes were not due. The company made a lowball offer to open market purchase them, using equity. Yes, the bottom line is that the bondholders ACCEPTED a highly distressed price, and that indicates that no one wants to hold debt from Molycorp. The S&P should leave off the downgrade ... it isn't default. The recovery prospects are not good, unless Molycorp makes money, and everyone knows that.

  • Reply to

    Delisting?

    by willly.wallly Dec 4, 2014 3:15 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Dec 4, 2014 7:12 PM Flag

    It takes a long time to be delisted. Really long. The $1 share price rule is that if a stock price is under $1 (the minimum bid requirement) for 30 CONSECUTIVE market days, then the NYSE/Nasdaq sends a letter that says the stock price must be above $1 within the next 180 days, or the stock is off the NYSE/Nasdaq.

    MCP has closed under $1 for 5 market days in a row. If it closes over $1 then the clock is re-set.

    The 180 day clock is sometimes allowed to be extended further. But ultimately, even if MCP was under $1 for the next 25 days, they have 2 quarterly reports before the 180 days is up, which is plenty of time to deliver better results. And if they can't then of course they would do a reverse split, or move to pink sheet trading.

    But those would be a LONG time away. I think the current prices below $1 will be a temporary thing.

  • votingmachine votingmachine Dec 4, 2014 2:56 PM Flag

    The S&P downgrade was in July of 2014. They closed a $400 million financing agreement September 11, 2014. That hardly is shut off from capital markets.

    The company has to deliver. They have adequate cash, and they have run thru every excuse. The management team is not bad ... they are adequate to the job.

    I think these are the debt numbers:

    $650 million at 10%, secured ... due 2020
    $360 million convertible notes at 6% ... due 2017 (now reduced by $27 million)
    $230 million convertible notes at 3.25% ... due 2016
    $150 million convertible notes at 5.5% ... due 2018 (now reduced by $11 million)
    $250 million (Oaktree) ambiguous interest ... due 2020
    $150 million (Oaktree future) ambiguous interest ... due 2020?

    The $150 million from Oaktree that is to be received in 2016 will cover most of the $230 million due then. They will either need to have $80 million cash available or else they will need to re-fi.

    If they are profitable, they will have no trouble re-fi'ing the $333 million due in 2017 and the $80 million needed for 2016, at a decent interest rate, and due in 5 years in 2021. Ideally, they turn to profitable before they burn much of the existing high level of cash on hand. If they were to hit profits with $200 million cash on hand, they could take the $150 million Oaktree loan, and cash on hand, and pay the 2016 notes off. Then re-fi the 2017 note, in 2017, for 5 years, due in 2022. 2018 has only $139 million due. Pay some, re-fi some.

    The capital markets should be shut until MCP turns a profit. Then they should open up again.

  • Reply to

    Is not MCP share price at $0.95 a joke?

    by chaulagaichet Dec 3, 2014 7:28 AM
    votingmachine votingmachine Dec 3, 2014 2:06 PM Flag

    I agree with what mcp_0 said: you don't have to sell it all. They have to produce about 20,000 mt at about $7000 per mt, for a net cost of production of $140 million. With SG&A of $30 million and $116 million of debt payment, they need to sell enough to have $300 million revenues.

    The Nd is 12% of the production, about 2400 mt. The Pr is 4% of production about 800 mt. Current price of Nd-oxide is over $70,000 per mt. Current price of Pr-oxide is over $116,000 per mt.

    2400 x $70,000 = $168 million
    800 x $116,000 = $92.8 million

    That is $260 million in revenues. If they sell lanthanum, they would be over $300 million per year. If they sell some cerium, some other elements, then they add to that revenue total.

    If prices go higher, then it looks better. And if they find markets for the cerium, it also looks better. But the plan as they currently tell it is to sell the non-cerium elements.

  • Reply to

    Is not MCP share price at $0.95 a joke?

    by chaulagaichet Dec 3, 2014 7:28 AM
    votingmachine votingmachine Dec 3, 2014 11:59 AM Flag

    They can pay the debt if they get to a profit. Any debt can then be re-fi'd at better terms. The entire business plan is to get the Mt Pass operation to profitable. If they do that, the debt is really not a problem.

    Companies that are succeeding can raise money. Companies that are failing have trouble doing that. Molycorp is currently failing. They have not delivered the Mt Pass progress that they have promised and planned. If/when they operate Mt Pass at capacity and at target costs, they will have a successful business.

    The debt is large. But not as large as people think. The debt is still under $2 billion, even with the new loans ... call it $1.8 billion. If that was a 30-year mortgage at 5%, that would require annual payments of $116 million to pay off. Currently the interest is high, and the debt is due much sooner than 30 years. But ultimately, the plan has to be to keep re-fi'ing a shrinking debt burden, paying it while still making profits in excess of that debt burden.

    They have quite a bit of cash reserves after this latest financing. And the 2016 debt should be payable with the money from this last re-fi. But the critical thing remains to get Mt Pass to the targets. IMO, that gets the numbers to profits enough to cover the debt burden.

  • Reply to

    New Short interest?

    by xclubfed1976 Nov 25, 2014 4:51 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Nov 25, 2014 5:25 PM Flag

    It is always slow to get released. I often find it on the WSJ site sooner than the Nasdaq.

    Google:
    short interest wsj

    or:
    short interest nasdaq

    and then click on thru. Generally, it takes a few hours before the updated info shows up.

    Post it here when you see it. Thanks.

  • Reply to

    What is the deal that management made?

    by sophiahoetmer Nov 21, 2014 5:45 PM
    votingmachine votingmachine Nov 21, 2014 8:33 PM Flag

    Although, if the bondholder was a "happy meal" bondholder, then the deal makes sense as an exit strategy. They already made the money at the bond issue. Now they just want to cover the short, which is to say, return the shares to the lender, Molycorp. Molycorp gives them shares, and they return the loaned shares.

    There can be some different scenarios and we don't know what they are.

GLD
122.71-1.52(-1.22%)10:35 AMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.