Please be aware of my less than stellar ability to forecast future prices. Last year at this time I was predicting AT&T would hit $40 by 4/1. Guess who turned out to be an April fool.
GOP will probably not impeach Obama until 2015 when they have a large majority in both houses. Benghazi will only be one of the charges. There are many more reasons that he should answer for.
T is the largest company in this industry and not likely to grow at the same rate as smaller competitors. Those who seek growth go to VZ which is growing faster and pays a larger dividend. It trades in the high end of the range you suggest.
The low on January 2 was $34.21 just like today so it seems as if it has been a very flat year. However, anyone brilliant enough to buy at $32.76 on 1/18 and sell at $39 on 4/23 made a neat 19% capital gain plus a 45 cent dividend. The odds of that happening are pretty slim but I can't agree with your Strong Sell position.
And this is the same support level as yesterday when a very few lucky people got into AT&T at $34.20. The lower Bollinger Band is at $34.75 and this is the third day in a row that T has been trading below the lower band. This is pretty strong confirmation of the down trend that started at the beginning of November. However the Bollinger Bands where $3.61 apart at the beginning of November and now are only $1.07 apart indicating much lower volatility going forward. Since we are in a downtrend I would not expect a recovery to much above $35 before the next down move to a little below $34. This is definitely a time to HOLD for $37 next year.
Let me splain. It is the car that is suppose to in and out of the GARAGE. No wonder you are having a problem with your 401K. I'm sure it is not large enough to drive a GARAGE into.
"Organizing For Action is looking for enthusiastic, dedicated folks to join our Spring Fellows program and get trained to be a lasting voice for change in their community." They train you in how to beat the system.
An interesting sidelight is that the above could not be highlighted and copied from the e-mail that I received from OFA. Seems Obama is more concerned about keeping his actions under wraps than he is about securing the information on the web site for the ACA. So much for his transparent administration.
that over half a million people have already signed up for ACA (he doesn't call it Obamacare anymore). He didn't mention that over five million have lost their insurance or that over three hundred million remain to be enrolled. There is also a problem in the system that will cause 1/3 of those enrolled to not get insurance.
I wondered why the FIOS advertising in my mail had stopped. I tried it once but, after two weeks, had it removed. It was not reliable in our area.
Nearly all politicians tell a lie now and again but Obama has taken it to a whole new level. The only honest thing I can remember was when he said he was going to change America. The really alarming thing is that he is getting away with it.
It isn't just USAA. Insurance is a legal racket and the only time you hear of an honest insurance company is when they are advertising.
That is indeed strange because George Washington's great Grandfather came to Virginia from England. I guess you are referring to Martha Washington's side of the family. She was a wealthy widow with two children when George married her. However Martha's parents had no history of coming from Ireland or Scotland. Martha's father was born in England and her mother was a second generation American who traced her lineage to an English great grandfather who married a French wife. George Washington did have three sisters so George may have been your uncle and the Plymouth Colony part inserted during the seven generations after George's sister. Martha's first marriage at 19 to a man 39 produced her daughter who died in her teens and her son who died in the Revolutionary War leaving two children who were raised by George and Martha. They had no children of their own.