"This is not a new or novel matter, rather it has been familiar for decades. While it involves future projections, the projections are based on facts, ..."
So why is the PPS where it is and has been if the outcome is the foregone conclusion you have reached?
All should be loading up on shares?
" we hold that a trial judge may award expectation damages" if they are not speculative & "may award" is not "can award"?
What happens to PIP if the DSC concludes that trial judge could not award damages because they were too speculative at the time of the breach of contract?
on promissory estoppel damages!
What happens to PIP if PIP loses the DSC appeal on expectancy damages because they were too speculative?