I would be a heavy buyer on any retest of the low. The rig count has been literally cut in half in just a few months and soon that's going to factor into production.
Liberals love being victim and believing what happens to them is fate (ironic since Pud claims to be an atheist). He chooses to believe that him and others being h0m0sexuals is caused by genetics because then people can't criticize his decision.
You know a lot about getting down on your knees, don't you?
Why don't you stick to your own threads and just talk to yourself Veg?
I agree that they do this and it was one of my major issues that I brought up to Mov. I am not saying his strategy is wrong, it's just not for every body.
MLK was a republican and Cruz is right that the warmietards are flat-Earthers.
I thought this was still America.
There are plenty of reasons to use hard stops but Mov needs to understand that there's different trading strategies for different people.
That's why I don't use hard stops.
Thank God they're looking at reforming and cutting the food stamp program. Soon she'll be working at McDonalds rather than sitting at home collecting welfare.
Please explain how you pick the EXACT top and low Veg? Are you stupid or just a troll?
Big candles always get retested.
First things first, it's very very difficult for one party to win back-to-back elections after a candidate's terms are up. GHB is one of the only examples in the recent memory. People are tired of the dems and running trillion dollar annual deficits while our standard of living stagnates/decreases.
Second, all of the dems have SERIOUS FLAWS. Of course, there are several GOP candidates that have flaws, including Ted Cruz, but the GOP bench is much deeper and so there are some candidates with relatively few flaws besides the usual MSM nit-picking.
Let's look at the prospective dem candidates:
-Hillary-Lots of baggage, HORRIBLE campaigner, old, dozens of scandals, a habitual liar, horrible record as SOS, etc.
-Biden-Barry's "third term", old, very gaffe prone and will make several bad headlines in a general election. Overall less risky than Hillary despite these.
-O'Malley-Bad record in a very blue state that his hand picked guy for a "third term" got DESTROYED in. If your guy can't win in your own state, you have no chance at winning the general election.
-Warren-Another proven liar, relatively inexperience, way too far left for most of America. A progressive pipe dream but so was Barry so you never know.
Cuomo is not running but would probably be the best candidate. Sanders has no change. Anyone else?
I think it's funny how you believe that every piece of government data is fake except the ones that selectively fit your agenda. You are truly a religious fanatic.
Lol. You know when people from outside Yahoo comment about the psychos on the Yahoo boards they're only talking about one in particular from the QQQ...