DisposableTard is flopping & flailing, but Yahoo keeps shutting the fecker down. LOL!
That reply was 'invalid', disposableTard. Try again. And again. And again. ROFL!
[ Currently, there is no patch for the bug, but Alert Logic reported the issue through RedHat and Bugzilla four months ago when it discovered the vulnerability. ]
There it is! Four months, and still no patch. God, what clowns Linux feckers are!
Torvalds will have no reason for existing if they cease to 'patch' Linux. So they keep patching.
Some of that patching involves introducing an untraceable lock-up bug, of course. ROFL!
The ridiculous fecktard disposableShet quotes some advisories as if there's any dearth of those for Linux. Let's see, for Ubuntu, we find several kernel security issue fixes on 12th Dec.
"Ubuntu: 2448-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities"
"Ubuntu: 2442-1: Linux kernel (EC2) vulnerabilities"
"Ubuntu: 2444-1: Linux kernel (OMAP4) vulnerabilities"
"Ubuntu: 2446-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities"
"Ubuntu: 2447-1: Linux kernel (Utopic HWE) vulnerabilities"
"Ubuntu: 2441-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities"
"Ubuntu: 2443-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities"
And on and on and on. There doesn't seem to be an end to security flaws in Linux kernel. God, what a joke Linux is! What a clown disposableShet is!
Wottard's denials are not very convincing. He seems to be very much on the payroll of Google.
Wasn't Alta Vista dominating search at one time too? Didn't it fall by the wayside as we were watching? LOL! Things are not looking good for Google and the investors echo this by keeping that stock price low. Apple has moved away from Google, and now FireFox wants to play with someone else. Pay for click is going down, and there is little return on all the money it keeps wasting on esoteric enterprises (including Chromebooks). And with Android, that money actually returns in hefty royalty revenue to Microsoft (to the tune of $2b a year, oh my!).
Fecked forever appear to be Google and its shills. LOL!
Don't whine so much about this "Vern" or whoever, tardmeister. If you look any more pathetic, people will burst out in tears. LOL!
And now, even Yahoo doesn't think disposableTard has anything of value to contribute to the discussion.
The bum can't get a word in edgewise. LOL!
The foul-mouthed Torvalds is a terrible 'ambassador' for Linux. His extreme animosity towards proprietary software companies is totally apparent.
No wonder that almost no company bothers with Linux driver or software development.
God, what a joke Linux is! What a clown Torvalds is!
We see that neither wottard nor disposableTard (assuming that they are two different bums) is able to explain why software *has* to be free, and why it's "unethical" to keep it proprietary. This is expected of these morons. Even fat cat Stallman cannot explain why he is screeching silly about software developers, while leaving everybody else to keep plenty of secrets.
As they say in India, it's blind leading the blind in this ridiculous "movement". LOL!
And in the last quarter of the last year, the mainframe sales dropped 37%. It's not like this is an isolated incident. ROFL!
"Linux is a generic name for a group of platforms. Last time I looked there were about 50 or so Linuxes and if you were to take a pin and blindfold and choose one, it would be God’s Will if it worked properly or not. Quite often the answer is ‘not’. My Ubuntu version of 2005 was an absolute crock that wasted the plastic on which it was distributed. Ubuntu was itself a loss-making personal hobby of a guy who had so many millions that he could afford the practical joke of distributing something that he knew did not work. Eventually perhaps they got it to work, after wasting untold hours of people’s time. As a professional friend of mine said ‘Free open source is free if your time is worth nothing.’ "
Oh boy! Linux is a practical joke!!! And no, they didn't get it to work. Because, before they can fix half the bugs in this release, they come up with a new release that introduces even more bugs. Linux is a cruel joke on its users. *snicker*
Wottard is keeping his head where the Sun don't shine, so let's bring the relevant material to this thread. LOL!
"Mainframe revenue was a stand-out loser with sales falling 35%."
Oh boy, is IBM taking it on the chin! The elephantine mainframes are replaced more & more with commodity servers, where Windows is the king (much ahead of the mediocre Linux). IBM keeps putting lipstick on the mainframe pigs and keeps trying to pawn them off on unsuspecting buyers, but people are now hip to its trickery. LOL!
As they say India, when IBM falls, many Loons die underneath. *snicker*
The whole "Free Software movement" is the brainchild of a mad man, promulgated & supported by other dumb individuals.
What's so special about software that it can't ever be proprietary? Why do creators in other trades get a free pass? Do we need a "Free Story Movement" or something to "liberate" the novels and short stories? ROFL!
This must make the Linux fecktards nervous.
The Linux fanatics have aligned themselves with Google for reasons best known to themselves. It's not like Google supports any of their own anti-social (and idiotic) philosophies. Google is all for keeping things proprietary. Just ask them to reveal their search algorithms and see how far you will get. LOL!
This is true.
Android is neither Linux nor Java, though it is lot more Java than it is Linux.
What's so great about a multitasking kernel anyways?
This is correct. Microsoft is around for some time. It is not inconceivable that it has patents that the new upstart Android infringes on.
If any Loons want to find out how viable Microsoft's claims are, we suggest they open up shop & make Android devices for sale. The bums will learn to shut up in short order. LOL!
This be true. They m#$%$ke #$%$ little effort to #$%$ppe#$%$r to be l#$%$w-#$%$biding, but when push comes to shove, the open sores f#$%$n#$%$tics #$%$re #$%$ll #$%$bout using #$%$ny me#$%$ns necess#$%$ry to "defe#$%$t the enemy".
The enemy is the government, l#$%$w #$%$nd order, #$%$nd #$%$ll the l#$%$w-#$%$biding citizens, of course.
"They prob#$%$bly wont respond to some f#$%$ke Asi#$%$n Indi#$%$n n#$%$med #$%$fter #$%$ dispos#$%$ble di#$%$per."
Who is this "they"? Do you re#$%$lize th#$%$t you #$%$re the one th#$%$t's expected to respond? Do you remember th#$%$t you were fielding questions from the Indi#$%$n posters, or #$%$re you so completely senile th#$%$t you #$%$lre#$%$dy forgot th#$%$t? ROFL! You could be bl#$%$bbering #$%$bout Y#$%$hoo not responding to Indi#$%$ns, but why don't you #$%$ddress the question th#$%$t w#$%$s put to you inste#$%$d of worrying #$%$bout Y#$%$hoo.
God, wh#$%$t #$%$ clown you #$%$re, dispos#$%$bleT#$%$rd. You #$%$re like #$%$n old wounded w#$%$rrior, except this #$%$in't no b#$%$ttle #$%$nd nobody is interested in fighting with you if you just shut up #$%$nd st#$%$y the feck #$%$w#$%$y. LOL!