What companies do you think will lead in the software area? ADSK? to me that's the third leg of the stool. Who do you think will become the catalogue/repository/distributor for all the 3-d code patterns that will arise for individual objects?
Sentiment: Strong Buy
yes, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't take them now, or at least some of it here. I did go through 2 large hard fast drops with them, the first took me by surprise. I lost $42,000 of paper gain, sold some, and then it dropped further a few days later. The second time I exited perfectly. Many times I held for months through as much as a 25/30% loss below cost. This time (in hindsight!) I sold WAY too early, for a combination of reasons, some about the market, some about my broker being closed out to me for 3.5 hours, and some out of needing a sense of safety. But I still don't (much) doubt the science or the commercialization npotential or the staff/mgmt team there. Best of luck to you, sincerely.
Look around. Do you see panicky types around? Even on this board full of yahoos? I expect a loss. I'm long. Mark my words: This is the stock I will retire on. I have (some) time. I made a mistake recently trading out a high flyer that has now risen 30% since I sold on 11/25 and I can't pull the trigger yet on re-entry, because I can't adjust my thinking to the new valuation. I'll take my chances on this one. Be cool.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company reported a net loss of approximately $33,049,000 or $.46 per diluted share, compared to net income of $13,380,000, or $.19 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Heard a lot from the new management on those timelines? I am not short, I am out. And I am out a lot of money because Reynolds, as a representative of this company, lied to investors about many things, all the while cashing in his shares every day. I am not here to tear down people who still believe in this, but I want to join with anyone who thinks differently.
Sentiment: Strong Sell
And if they don't tone it down (because they probably won't) use the dropdown, Report Abuse, and then again for Ignore. Unfortubnately, their topic headers will still show, and that's why that subject line is usually stuffed with trash talking.
Date: Oct 21, 2013
Wyss Institute Core Faculty member David Mooney.
BOSTON -- David Mooney, Ph.D., a Core Faculty member at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University and the Robert P. Pinkas Family Professor of Bioengineering at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, has been elected to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academies, which is one of the highest honors in the field of medicine in the United States.
Trying to get my email to you, Juggsy, but the posting fails repeatedly. Please try to contact me, use this id at g mail.