When you look at the deniers on the left about the disaster that has been Odummycare you could come to the same conclusion. The "double" was based on a couple examples such as people that had limited insurance by their choosing because they were young and healthy. It also excludes the fact that now some people get another government handout to keep their bill from going up while the rest of us are screwed. My insurance is up 28% from 2012. I thought inflation was in check...oh wait Odummy told us we would save $2,500 a family...I guess that is only if you don't pay for your insurance anyway.
Reality #2: Your source for the numbers also say "currently the US population is about 3.2 billion". Well, they are only off the mark by some 900 Million. LOL.
Reality #3. When Odummy took office, 14.4% were uninsured. Now 11.9% are uninsured. It has cost us an average of $58 Billion to knock 2.5% off the uninsured rate. What a bargain. Note: CBO numbers.
Reality #4. I know 2 doctors who have decided to retire due to headaches caused them by Odummycare and other government interferences. Also, it is near impossible now in some communities especially smaller ones to get in to even see a doctor. I know this from relatives in those small communities and what their doctors tell them. Great to have insurance when you can't use it.
You keep drinking the liberal koolaid and some day you will see how Odummycare will turn into another government program gone wrong.
Interesting timing consider Rules for Radicals was published in 1971. SaulAlinskyNazeeee put his tactics he had been using to divide the nation in writing. Odummy learned well and continues on in the radical lib way to divide the nation to push their radical ideas on the nation.
Even the New York Slims is attacking Billiary....she is toast. If this had come from Fox you libs would just being saying it was made up. It is coming from your own lib press so how do you deny it? That is why you are ticked off so you just attach someone that is not a leftest nutcase.
If you put EVERYBODY on ignore, then how do you know your message went through because you would have ignored yourself as well. LOL.... Must be a lib
Your reading comprehension is on a 1st grade level. You really need to stop showing your ignorance. The point is....let me see if I can make it simple for you....If 1% of the population can decide to change the definition of marriage then so can anyone else. I say we just change the definition of truth to mean lies and then everything you say will be claimed as a truth. By changing the definition is the only way you don't lie any longer.
When you libs LiesAllDay to marry his dog then I guess we can change the definition to be marriage between any willing parties. We can have 10 men marry 10 other men or women. Why not? We will let the libs marry their farm animals too as why should you discriminate against those that wish to "marry" an animal because they love their animal. Hey, you libs should probably redefine marriage to be between brothers and sisters too. That is the lib way!!!
You know the saying, keep your friends close and your enemies closer. In this case, it is better to know there is an incompetent person in charge and how they work unlike the new incompetent person that you have not figured out.
Then why do you spend all day making things up? Can't you see that you are just an ignorant fool talking about herself?
So your ignorance shows again. The "tax" money to the government goes to China to pay our debt. The government produces no good or services so the government in itself cannot make the economy "pie" any larger.
So you only believe him if it backs up what ignorant thought of the day you currently have in your small mind? LOL
Here is another Mcjobs fact. The unemployment recovery has mainly been in low paying jobs.
"The median U.S. household income of $54,500 in February remained $1,500 short of the December 2007 level, at the start of the recession, according to inflation-adjusted estimates from Sentier Research."
If you think a tax increase ushers in economic boom then you are more ignorant that I thought.
Because you have never said anything substantial and have nothing substantial to say, does that mean you will just shutup and go away!?!?!? LOL.
Actually, GOP would love to return to the Gingrich GOP congressional economy. Clinton sucked it up and went along with the GOP after the 1994 whipping of the democraps so he could get re-elected in 1996.
Trump also said Odummy was far from qualified so I guess you believed him then as well. LOL.
In summary, you are saying that there are more guns now than in 1993 yet the crime rate has gone down. Your stats on Dallas does not contain the suburbs where the more affluent live and crime rates are ultra low. One of the safest mid to large size cities in the US is just north of Dallas.