Sun, Feb 26, 2012, 9:11 AM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Don't expect the phone to replace the wallet soon

    RELATED QUOTES

    SymbolPriceChange
    EBAY36.36+0.34
    GPS22.57-0.95
    GOOG609.90+3.79
    PNC59.38-0.30
    C32.35-0.36

    By Dhanya Skariachan and Joe Rauch

    (Reuters) - Don't throw your wallet away yet.

    Many big-name retailers from Gap to Toys R Us are partnering with banks, payment processors and Google to let shoppers tap their mobile phones instead of swiping their credit cards to pay for goods. But the new mode of payment is not expected to take off in earnest for at least another couple of years.

    A KPMG study released on Wednesday found only 23 percent of consumers were willing to use their mobile phone in place of other forms of payment, with 30 percent of younger adults much more willing to do so.

    And that means that all those hopes of retailers becoming more efficient at checkout and banks finding another revenue stream won't be a reality soon.

    Shoppers in cities such as New York, San Francisco and Chicago are warming up to the idea of paying by phone, but it will still take another two to four years for widespread adoption, potential participants in the mobile payment industry said.

    One major obstacle to universal adoption of the new payment method is doubt among consumers and some companies that paying with one's smart phone is secure and easier than using a credit or debit card or cash.

    Jack Koenig, a 52-year-old Broadway actor and New York resident, said he would wait for a while before he tested it.

    "I am in no rush. What is the advantage per se? Is it really that much more convenient for me? I don't really think so," Koenig said. "If you lose your phone, you will be screwed."

    Richard Mader, head of the technology division of trade group National Retail Federation, said, "Multiple things must come together. Mostly, consumers need to have the right amount of knowledge and education about the technology, and retailers must be able to accept mobile payments."

    Others agreed.

    "Just the act of paying with your phone is a new thing for most of us. We're also working hard to educate people about why mobile payments represent the future of commerce," said Marc Freed-Finnegan Sr, business product manager of Google Wallet.

    Still, it is hard to ignore the small but growing pay-by-phone market. Research firm Aite Group expects the pay-by-phone transactions to total $2.1 billion in 2012 and $22.6 billion by 2015.

    While the long-term potential seems huge, near-term hurdles related to security concerns, availability of contactless payment machines and installation costs for retailers are working against the initiative.

    Currently only about 500,000 NFC readers (contactless payment machines) have been installed at retailers' point-of-sale locations, or checkout registers, in the United States.

    "We feel that it will take time," said David Marcus, vice president of mobile at eBay's PayPal unit. "We don't want to ... solely rely on NFC to go offline in a big way."

    PayPal is watching developments in mobile payments but also getting ready to roll out a "wallet in the cloud" initiative that lets shoppers pay using their computers, cell phones and cards that give access to their coupons, or by simply typing their mobile number and pin at checkout counters.

    Amid other challenges, 71 percent of 970 companies surveyed by KPMG said they believed they must overcome security concerns to succeed in mobile payments.

    And changing that will take time.

    "2012 will be about a beta and expanding that beta test. It will take some time for these this to become mainstream," said Thomas Kunz, senior vice president at PNC Financial. Kunz oversees the Pittsburgh-based bank's payments and e-business.

    "There are 11 million merchants in the United States, and nobody's being paid to make this change," Kunz said. "Using a phone instead of a card is not such a big deal, at least right now."

    So far, U.S. wireless operators Verizon Wireless, AT&T and T-Mobile USA have joined with Discover to form a joint venture targeting mobile payments.

    Wireless competitor Sprint meanwhile has joined with a host of companies in a another joint venture. In it Google will supply Google Wallet software that today can hold MasterCards issued by Citi, and FirstData will provide infrastructure for securely delivering payment credentials to Google Wallet.

    Google has also signed agreements with Visa, American Express and Discover, and hopes to include their cards in Google Wallet, Freed-Finnegan told Reuters.

    Starbucks, which has had a lot of success with its own mobile apps due to the overwhelming response from its tech-savvy and relatively well-heeled consumers, is also optimistic about the potential of mobile payments.

    "It will be a big deal. It is just a matter of time," said Adam Brotman, senior vice president and general manager of Starbucks Digital Ventures.

    SO FAR SO GOOD

    Despite the lack of immediate rewards, some store chains are currently testing the payment method, and more merchants are expected to join the pay-by-phone bandwagon in 2012.

    American Eagle Outfitters, Container Store, Foot Locker, Guess, Jamba Juice, Macy's, OfficeMax, Toys R Us and Gap are among the chains that let shoppers use "Google Wallet."

    They let shoppers pay for goods, redeem coupons and earn rewards points, all with a single tap of their phone.

    "They love it. We did a demo event at our Times Square store in which customers got to use loaner phones to try out the technology," said Jani Strand, a spokeswoman for teen apparel chain American Eagle.

    "It's still very early, but the goal is to make the AEO shopping experience as fun and convenient as possible. Our customers are rarely without their smartphones, so any engagement that connects with them through these devices tends to be effective," Strand added.

    Currently about 200 Toys R Us and Babies R Us stores let shoppers pay using their smartphones, Toys R Us spokeswoman Katie Reczek said.

    "We will continue to evaluate the program to make a determination about expanding its offering to additional locations," Reczek added.

    In addition to the playing the convenience card, many such as MasterCard and Google said the pay-by-phone method is actually safer than regular credit card transactions.

    Purchases by phone are safer because of the added software limits in place to keep people from accessing your data improperly, whereas they can just swipe a number off a debit card illicitly, MasterCard executive Mario Shiliashki said.

    "Google Wallet goes far, far beyond the protections that you have in place for your wallet today. Google Wallet is a much more secure platform -- it's truly a wallet you can lock," Google's Marc Freed-Finnegan said.

    Also, consumers are more likely to carry their phone than anything else, because it has become a key social tether.

    "You're more likely to leave your home without your wallet or your cigarettes than you are your phone. And I mention cigarettes because the phone has become more addictive than the most addictive substance out there," Shiliashki said.

    (Reporting by Dhanya Skariachan in New York and Joe Rauch in Charlotte, North Carolina; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)

     

    34 comments

    • Tool  •  2 months ago
      I'll never do it. I did programming for this in 1994, for JPM, so, if it has not caught on yet, then Steve Jobs will have to get behind it to get it going, and I dont see that happening now.
      I'm also horrified about my electronic trail. Enough. I need to get off the grid more.
    • john z  •  2 months ago
      Everyone wants to have easier access to your money. Me. I like cash. Nobody gets it unless I hand it to them and no skimmers to worry about or wrong charges on my credit card or lost or stolen cards to worry about. No bills or fees to worry about. Cash is fast.
    • David  •  2 months ago
      Funny how the headline of the article and the content of the article are total opposites. Title says not coming soon yet in the article they give a list of companies doing it now with great success.
    • jim m  •  2 months ago
      i went to the city, Saturday , my friend showed me a box. it was for people who have smart chip credit/debit cards. i asked what was the box for? he explained, that people have developed scanners they can just walk by , and steal the card info. then empty the account in seconds with the card still in wallet or purse. computers are tools, but also, it would seem they are a weapon of thief's.,same as a knife,or a gun. i not seeing much of a gain, in using tools, that could create these exploit opportunities, just by their country of their origin, would be a RED FLAG. "it's truly a wallet you can lock" , is it now?
    • soylent bob  •  2 months ago
      what's a mobile phone. i intend to be the last person without one.
    • James  •  2 months ago
      Many factors need to be addressed before this practice becomes mainstream. My short list off the top of my mind:
      1) I need to be anonymous so my buying is not tracked by anyone.
      2) I need to be compensated for adopting this method, approx %3 off each purchase.
      3) I can't be made to pay $49.99 a month for a phone to use this method.

      Honestly, if a merchant is willing to pay %3 to a credit card issuer for my purchase, why not just give it to me since we've eliminated the credit card?

      I would never pay $49.99 a month for a credit card fee, so why would I pay so much for a phone to pay my bills with?

      In light of just these two issues, why not use cash and be anonymous? I think it's time for consumers to return to cash for these reasons and also to eliminate costly interest on debt.
    • Marvin  •  2 months ago
      This is just one more step toward the Mark of the Beast. Eventually they'll be able to turn your digital money off if you displease them. No, thanks.

      I'll resist the Beast and I'll use my cash instead.
    • health1_au  •  2 months ago
      1) Curb your impulsiveness, not just when spending money but overall.
      2) Don't pay anything or anyone for access to your own money.
    • Satyr  •  2 months ago
      The last organization that I'd let have access to my financial information and purchasing habits is Google. They already know where I walk, what I say to my friends, and the color of my rooftop. My level of trust that they will not do something I wouldn't like with my data is about zero.
    • Scott  •  2 months ago
      Perfect for tracking every purchase you make. Knowing every place you go. CREEPY.
    • HY  •  2 months ago
      The ease and simplicity of paying for a merchandise with a smart phone increases the tendency of buying unnecessary things on impulse. With your wallet, having to take out cash or a card may make you think twice before actually buying that thing. As show here, mine is not a smart phone; in fact, it is a 6-year old antique but still works fine for the sole purpose of a cell phone. I have saved thousands of dollars in the past several years for not having a data plan for my cell phone service.
    • j  •  Orlando, Florida  •  2 months ago
      Ok, I get the whole new technology thing, but this is a royal pain in the a_ $$. Several times I've been standing in the checkout line while someone tries to wave their iphone/droid across the scanner. Seems to rarely work quickly.

      Meanwhile myself and others are getting p.o. 'd because this person, after 5 or 6 swipes, eventually reaches into their wallet/purse for cash/credit card when they could have just done this from the very beginning. Bottom line,... its takes too friggin long.
    • K.S.  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  2 months ago
      I'd like to see if google can pull this one off. I think they will
    • steelerman  •  2 months ago
      Old geezer here, You can have my wallet only when you can pry it from my cold..... dead....hands. Oh, and if you can beat my wife to it.
    • jim m  •  2 months ago
      is it ok if i just use my phone, as a phone, i dont believe, it could ever be more than just a phone, people are just being conditioned to consume so much more, redundant mess: Example1= simple, shop, pay with USD, Example= shop pay with phone,oops forgot to pay the phone bill, charge the battery, no signal, dropped it, need a new $175.00 screen, when you push pay, there goes your money and your privacy, up in the air.....most likely the the payment will be routed through another country, humm? there goes some more jobs. i gonna say logic would not let me dance. to the pied piper. (sorry about the spelling, no spell checker-smart phone, no bill for it either)....... peace with no contract, no problem.
    • Quinn  •  2 months ago
      Paypal is a very dangerous company to deal with financially. They are not regulated as a banking institution, credit card processor or any other financial regulations. They operate on their own accord and can (and do) freeze accounts at their whim.

      As for Google, their only goal is to collect as much data as possible about you.

      Both offer little or no customer service.

      A mobile payment solution from either of these companies will be an epic failure.
    • Mike  •  2 months ago
      I have a cell phone, I answer it when it rings, I call people with it. End of story.
    • Tony D  •  Los Gatos, California  •  2 months ago
      I for one can't wait for it. BTW most modern phones require a pin number to access them, then when you pay you also have to enter your pin number like you currently do for a debit card. So if your phone got stolen that person who stole it would have to know 2 of your pin numbers to buy anything with it. AND even if they did discover them your phone records everything. The authorities would only have to go to your carrier and get the phone records and I imagine the transactions will be recorded there as well. Now they could intercept your transaction as it flies around, BUT we already have a similar problem with devices and viruses recording you debit card info so, really what's the big deal?
    • jim m  •  2 months ago
      oh please , route my money and personal data to all the foreign countries, you choose to do buisness with, those poor people need jobs too. please feel free to visit my web page, kiss my a-double-s. kom. you will have much fun there. no contract required. USD only please. thanks again! kentucky speaks. we teach you new way to speak in future classes. say, did they find that 1.something billion from that mf global dude?
    • Landon  •  2 months ago
      the bigger question is the extension of credit. are phone companies and third party vendors going to be subjected to the same financial regulatory standards as the likes of a "bank?" i guess purchasing virtual goods online with your cell doesn't necessitate this, but apply the purchasing of physical goods that have a lower margin and you can quickly see the problem.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
    Loading...