In Friday's article I talked about one of the two models I played around with back in 2005 that produced remarkable results over time. One was a growth-stock model that produced some interesting names worth paying attention to as the market moves lower. The second screen was a combination of growth components and value criteria.
The working theory in developing this approach was to find profitable companies that were reasonably valued on the basis of earnings and asset values. They also had to own twice as much as they owed. The companies had to have grown moderately over the past five years, and the analysts and research services that followed the company had to feel it would grow reasonably in the future. The specific criteria used were a price-to-earnings ratio less than 12, price-to-book-value of less than 1.5, a debt-to-total-capital ratio less than 50% and expected and historical growth of 5% annually.
I ran the screen through my quick and dirty back-test on Friday and found that it still handily outperforms the market. More importantly, coming off of significant market bottoms, it produced spectacular returns. It was also obvious to me that you have to approach this screen with a macro and market view in mind, or else it could get you into trouble. There was a tendency in good times to cluster in industries trading at a low multiple of peak earnings, a potential recipe for disaster. In early 2007, for example, the list was clustered with financial stocks and homebuilders. If you followed the screen blindly, the results would have been unpleasant, to say the least.
Still, although the stocks have been volatile, the returns have been very good over the long run. We have seen stock prices fall 40% as measured by the S&P 500 this year, and this model does very well in a recovery market, so it's worth looking at the companies that make the list. As my current macro and market views remain somewhat negative, I am going to be very selective, and as always lately, move slowly and start small.
The current screen includes a lot of insurance companies. These companies have been battered in 2008 as a result of investment losses, poor underwriting and a soft insurance market. Some of them, however, are worth a further look. HCC Insurance
HCC's management appears to be very good at the underwriting side of the business and has a combined ratio in the mid-80s. Even with hurricane losses in the third quarter, the combined ratio for HCC was just 88%. The company has had investment losses, but they are miniscule compared with those of some of its competitors. The company is using its strong balance sheet and weak markets to make acquisitions that allow it to expand its markets.
Met Life
MetLife's operating earnings next year are expected to be $3.60 to $4 a share. The company is also in good shape financially in spite of investment losses. Analysts estimate the company has over $3 billion in excess capital. Met Life is the largest life insurance company in the U.S. and is gaining market share globally. When you combine these factors with the company's strong balance sheet, this stock should be a core holding for years to come, and I would be buying on weakness.
A couple of other old favorites made the current list of cheap growth stocks. I have owned Helen of Troy
Foot Locker
There is something for everyone is the current screen results. If you agree that oil is probably going to be higher next year, then ConocoPhillips
Although the market and economy are weak right now, I believe we will see a recovery over the next several years. Focusing on safe, cheap growth stocks is one way to benefit from that recovery.
Copyright © 2009 TheStreet.Com. All rights reserved.