Mon, May 28, 2012, 5:40 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Analysis: US bid to crimp Iran oil sales stumbles

Analysis: US bid to convince Asian nations to limit Iranian oil purchases makes little headway

TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) -- American attempts to get major Asian importers of Iranian oil to rein in their purchases are faltering as allies South Korea and Japan give U.S. officials a polite brushoff. Emerging giants India and China may even increase their purchases, further stymieing Washington's efforts to force Iran to curtail its nuclear program.

In 2011, Japan, South Korea, India and China accounted for 60 percent of Iran's oil sales, and the U.S. initiative — backed up by financial sanctions — is meant to dig away at the $100 billion in oil revenues Tehran earned last year.

Iran will likely suffer some losses when a planned European Union oil embargo kicks in July, and those could be deepened by the discounted prices it may have to offer to Asian buyers in the face of the sanctions. That adds to the pressure on Iran's budget but seems set to fall short of the bruising blow that Washington hoped to land.

Several Asian nations "depend on Iran for a good portion of their oil, particularly India and China," said Singapore-based oil analyst Victor Shum of consultants Purvin & Gertz. "It's very difficult for them to switch."

That's a concern for Washington, which hopes that its initiative — combined with the EU embargo — will be enough to force Iran into serious negotiations on the nuclear program the West believes is aimed at producing nuclear weapons. Iran says it is for peaceful purposes only.

Complicating matters are persistent Israeli threats to attack Iranian nuclear installations if sanctions efforts fail. While sympathizing with Israeli concerns over the specter of a nuclear-armed enemy, many western leaders fear an Israeli attack would wreak havoc throughout the Middle East and jeopardize the still fragile international economic recovery, as oil prices spike.

Longtime American ally South Korea, which in 2011 bought about 250,000 barrels per day of Iranian oil — 10 percent of its total oil imports — has been a big target for the American effort, recently hosting two visits by senior U.S. officials who came to try to persuade it to cut back or Iranian oil purchases.

So far at least, the results have not been not encouraging.

The Foreign Ministry in Seoul says that no decision has yet been made on the U.S. request, apparently out of fear that the country would be hard pressed to find alternative suppliers to fill in the gap left by Iranian crude.

The picture in Japan is similar. On Friday, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda said "the trend is we'll cut oil imports from Iran" amid continuing efforts to secure alternative supplies from other Middle Eastern countries.

However, Japanese authorities also pressed the U.S. to permit them exemptions from President Barack Obama's Feb. 6 executive order, which imposes sanctions on foreign institutions involved in helping finance Iranian oil sales. That suggests a determination to continue buying Iranian oil to a significant degree.

Japan, which in 2011 sourced 10 percent of its 3.4 million barrels per day of oil imports from Iran, has been gradually cutting back on Iranian oil, paring imports by about 40 percent over the past five years.

As a close Iranian ally, China has also dug its heels in — in fact, far deeper than either South Korea or Japan. Beijing turned a blind eye to efforts by American Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to get it to cut back on Iranian imports during a January visit and earlier this month the Communist Party newspaper People's Daily described Western efforts to pressure Iran with an oil embargo as "casting a shadow over the global economy."

China is a massive purchaser of Iranian oil, averaging about 550,000 barrels per day in 2011, about 10 percent of its total imports. While purchases have declined over the past several weeks, oil analyst Mark Pervan of ANZ Bank in Melbourne attributes that to Chinese efforts to pressure Tehran to reduce prices in the face of the U.S. pressure.

Shum said that Chinese purchases of Iranian oil could increase substantially in coming months, particularly if Iran offers Beijing a discount on its oil sales.

"China wants to build its strategic reserve of crude and the Chinese are now in a good negotiating position as far as securing supplies," he said.

The reserve, which presently stands at 102 million barrels — 21 days of imports — is scheduled to add another 168 million barrels of storage facilities by early 2013. In a report earlier this month, the Paris-based International Energy Agency said that new Chinese storage centers "could materially affect Chinese crude oil demand in 2012," suggesting that if they were filled at a steady pace China would need to secure an additional 220,000 barrels per day. That does not take into account any additional accretion for economic growth or from falling domestic production.

Shum said it was still unclear how much of the increment China might try to source from Iran, particularly in light of the strong U.S. objections.

"There will be a bit of a political element to any decision," he said.

India, China's competitor in the Asian high growth sweepstakes, ramped up its purchases of Iranian crude to 550,000 barrels per day in January, largely on the back of additional supply availability stemming from the cutback in Chinese acquisitions. In 2011 it averaged around 340,000 barrels per day in Iranian oil purchases, accounting for some 12 per cent of its imports.

While it is uncertain whether the country can sustain the January level over the long term, a booming economy will keep overall oil imports high. And with many Indian refineries designed specifically to process Iranian crude, it seems likely that it will continue to source a major portion of its oil from Iran, notwithstanding objections from the United States.

Still, the impact of the American sanctions — and parallel pressure from the European Union — is now being felt. Indian oil payments to Iran, initially channeled through German-based Europaisch-Iranische Handelsbank, were moved to Turkey's Turkiye Halk Bankasi AS after EU intervention, though that channel may prove short lived in the face of the increasing heat from U.S. authorities.

To cope with the new sanctions, the Iranian ambassador to India announced last week that India and Iran have reached a deal allowing Indian oil companies to pay for 45 percent of their imports in Indian rupees, reducing the need for dollar-handling foreign banks as facilitators.

Some reports — unconfirmed by Indian authorities — have also suggested that India may consider a barter arrangement in lieu of oil payments, including exports of wheat and other grain as shortages of food commodities begin to bite in Tehran.

In contrast to the generally ineffective American efforts in Asia, the pending EU embargo of Iranian imports — about 450,000 barrels per day in 2011 — could have an impact when it goes into effect in July. According to Shum, this reflects a combination of slower European growth prospects and the ability of recently reinstated Libyan oil production to make up for large parts of any Iranian shortfall.

But with China and India undeterred by the American stance on Iranian oil, part of the European offtake might simply be transferred eastward.

__

Associated Press writers Nirmala George in New Delhi, Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo and Foster Klug in Seoul, South Korea contributed to this report.

 

5 comments

  • MAJIC12  •  Auckland, New Zealand  •  3 months ago
    What this will begin is a seismic shift away from the U.S. Petrodollar. Funny thing is, this is exactly what the U.S. it trying to stop. Iran has been doing more and more of it's oil business in other currencies, even before it was accused of trying to produce nukes. This is simply freaking the U.S. out, as they make soooo much money out of the majority of the world's commodities being traded with the good old greenback. This is not and has never been about nukes. It's about money, pure and simple.
    • FS 3 months ago
      More than merely money is at stake, however obviously it remains a major consideration for the big business interests whom are pulling the the congress members strings.
    • Fencer 3 months ago
      Good post!
    • lamare01 3 months ago
      Mhhh... if the money factor is a good one in a way... I still didn't see Iran opening up its nuke program to the West or the East for that matter..., nor expressing dark intents either.
      The economical agenda of each of the players is certainly at work, and the political agenda as well....every body is trying one way or an other to get out of the 2008 mess.
      The nuclear agenda of is an entirely different one... push come to shove.
      And I do see an alignment to prevent a 2d Irak style war...the Big Grabbing in Foreign soil... be it politically, economically, and market accesses... without having to resort to war so far.
      There was the Nazi... with some historical lessons. Some forgot about it, if they ever learned those lessons in the 1st place... but most of the Globe didn't.
      There might be some local puppets that are not so important, corruptibles as it were... but that doesn't change much in the grand scheme of things.
      Nobody will have the power to dictate others, or steal from others... no money, no power will be the counter measure... sure to hit the mark.
      The international rhetoric tells me that much... and I don't even care what Israel or Iran are saying... ether's day are counted, if they cross the line, and that of any belligerent participating in that particular conflict.
      No more surprise Irak style grab by anybody will be a freebie, and the lesson could very well last over a few generations. Instant gratification has a much higher price... and the market place will decide how high that is , and how long too.
      Wars are not won by the militaries anymore... they are won on the market place, and they always last much longer.

      Better start doing thing constructively.
  • jOHHNY  •  3 months ago
    Should have stayed in Iraq and pumped oil out of there by the tanker full until they repaid their debt to us from liberating them.
  • Where's Waldo  •  Beech Grove, Indiana  •  3 months ago
    When will we learn to mind our own business. We have 20,000 bombs and we are the only ones to ever drop one on somebody. Who are we to tell a country that has been around for thousands of years they can't have a bomb.
    We need to close all our overseas bases. We can't afford them anymore. Let someone else police the world.
  • Fencer  •  Budapest, Hungary  •  3 months ago
    US slowly realizes that its no longer the only chief in the room. There are other chiefs now and they have power as well. US and Israel will not dictate the world economy and dictate who goes to War with whom anymore. China, India, Brazil could care less about Israel and its past. Israel never acknowledged other religions such as Buddhism, Hinduism...why the hell should a Chinese care about a Jew? Does the Jew give a rats ars about the Buddhist culture?
  • Man  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
    This is he headline:
    "Analysis: US bid to crimp Iran oil sales stumbles"
    This is the content:
    "Iran will likely suffer some losses when a planned European Union oil embargo kicks in July, and those could be deepened by the discounted prices it may have to offer to Asian buyers in the face of the sanctions."
    AP never ceases to amaze me. The MOST infantile reporting you can find. Can't even slam the U.S. without lookng like total idiots.
    Peter "Enav";
    Looks like you and your liberal staff have done it again.....made me laugh so hard I cried.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER