Mon, May 28, 2012, 5:47 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    New Annuity Rules for 401(k)s

    Fantasy Finance

    The federal government is trying to make it easier for workers to buy annuities with their retirement savings. The Treasury Department issued several new regulations last week aimed at encouraging retirement savers to use their 401(k) balance to purchase an annuity that would guarantee monthly payments throughout retirement.

    [See How to Take Advantage of New 401(k) Fee Disclosures.]

    "Having the ability to choose from expanded options will help retirees and their families achieve both greater value and security," says Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. Here's a look at how the Treasury's regulations could impact your 401(k) plan.

    Partial annuities. One the Treasury's proposals aims to make it simpler for retirees to purchase annuities with some of their retirement savings, while retaining the rest as a lump sum for other purposes. A 2011 Government Accountability Office report found that many middle class households without traditional pension plans would come out ahead by using some of their retirement savings to purchase an annuity.

    Consider a couple that has $191,000 saved for retirement who uses half of that balance ($95,000) to purchase an annuity that would provide $355 per month until the death of the last surviving spouse and annual increases for inflation. This immediate annuity provides slightly more money than the annual income provided by a 4 percent draw down strategy, while also protecting the couple from the risks of investment losses and inflation, according to GAO calculations. And by leaving half of their savings outside the annuity, the couple also has money for unexpected expenses or to pass on to heirs.

    [See 401(k) and IRA Changes Coming in 2012.]

    Annuities also have their drawbacks, including sometimes steep fees and expenses and complicated mechanics. There's also a possibility that an insurance company could default on its obligation to make annuity payments.

    Longevity annuities. Another Treasury proposal would make it easier for retirement savers to purchase longevity annuities. Longevity annuities are generally less expensive than immediate annuities because the monthly payments don't start until late in your retirement, perhaps at age 80 or 85, so that you will have money in your later years in case you live that long. "Because longevity annuities typically are purchased at or near retirement, but do not begin paying benefits until considerably later, they can be offered at a fraction of the cost of annuities that pay immediate benefits," according to a report by the Council of Economic Advisers. For example, an annuity for a 65-year-old that offered a guaranteed stream of payments of $20,000 per year beginning immediately might cost $277,500, while a deferred annuity offering the same annual benefits starting at age 85 might cost just $35,200, the report found. "Because the annuity starts far in the future it serves as a kind of insurance so you can enjoy the security of knowing you will have retirement income even if you live far beyond your life expectancy," according to a Treasury official.

    Spousal protections. The Treasury clarified rules that require a spouse's consent when a worker elects to purchase a single-life annuity in which payments would end when the worker dies, rather than continuing throughout the lifetime of the surviving spouse.

    [See How to Finance Life Until 100.]

    Pension plan rollovers. Employees would also be allowed to use their 401(k) plan payout to obtain a low-cost annuity from their employer's traditional pension plan. "If the employer sponsors both a 401(k) and a defined benefit plan the ruling provides an opportunity to roll over or transfer some of the benefit to the defined benefit plan," according to a Treasury official.

    Twitter: @aiming2retire



    More From US News & World Report
     

    36 comments

    • Paul  •  Wichita, Kansas  •  3 months ago
      It sounds good, but LOTS of possible pitfalls, too........why do I tend to NOT trust much of what this government advises when they change the rules ?
      • landon 3 months ago
        Go Tigers!
      • Da Truth 3 months ago
        The government loves these things because whether you want to believe it or not, insurance companies do a MUCH BETTER job of creating a product that will pay a lifetime stream of income while government pensions are usually based on the continued contribution of EXISTING employees. HUGE difference.
    • J  •  3 months ago
      Sounds like they are gearing people up for NOT having any SS money by the time they retire.
      • Birddogchief 3 months ago
        You just figuring that out? The writing was on the wall when they allowed IRAs , 401k s, etc in the 80's. The sad part is that many chose to not participate. I like that you will have more choices, but not sure an annuity is the way to go. Diversification is still the best plan.
    • Clark  •  Copperopolis, California  •  3 months ago
      If you read the fine print on annuities, they don't guarantee you will get your money back. If the company goes bankrupt or what they invest in doesn't keep pace with the payout commitment, you lose. If you and spouse die before the payout matches the investment, nothing goes to your estate. It doesn't sound that good to me.
      • Angry Mick 3 months ago
        You hit on one key factor...it doesn't sound good to you. For some, it is a good option. It just depends on what you are looking for. For some annuities, if the account value drops to zero, then you annuitize it at the highest account value and receive income distributions for the remainder of your life. But you are correct, money will not pass on to your next of kin.
    • Alice  •  3 months ago
      Hold it hold it hold it. I have already taken my money and purchased a future cash flow. I did it every paycheck when I took a chunk of change and bought Social Security. And that is going broke.
      • Taco Bill 3 months ago
        Nobody to that thank for that but your representation in Washington. While you and your employer were contributing to the SS trust fund, you representatives in Washington were taking it, replacing it with IOUs, and spending it on whatever tickled their fancy. Things like $500 Million to Solynra; AIG, GM and Chrysler bailouts, Citi, BOA and even Goldman Sachs bailouts....

        So, the SS trust find currently holds a lot of worthless paper with big numbers written on it!
    • Rick  •  Caledonia, Wisconsin  •  3 months ago
      keep the government out of this, buyer beware!!!
    • Evolved  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
      Why would the government even want to encourage the use of annuity? This is not a very good choice.
      • Lorili 3 months ago
        The government always encourages corporations to fleece Americans.
      • Robert 3 months ago
        Because they know that SS isn't going to be there much longer, this will replace it, in part.
    • Anthony America  •  3 months ago
      Then when you save a bunch you can call the guy's
      It's My Money And I Want It Now!!!
      Suckers born every second
    • Da Truth  •  Dayton, Ohio  •  3 months ago
      I have been in the business for 14 years and have never heard of a Longevity Annuity. I do work with annuities that offer guaranteed income for life without annuitization but I have never heard of them referred to with that title.
    • Mike  •  Columbus, Indiana  •  3 months ago
      Buying an annuity is the same as going to a Casino. Plus transaction and broker fees.
    • Dan  •  Stamford, Connecticut  •  3 months ago
      This is a joke piece, right? Let me see if I get this straight. The GAO is suggesting an annuity indexed to the gov's CPI, when the BLS understated inflation last year by 8%? Imagine the insanity of calculating your needs at some distant date based on the present purchasing power of the dollar where the true rate of inflation compounded would make the payment chump change. But then again, such policies are designed for chumps. What's worse, Congress has already aired nationalizing all private retirement accounts, transferring the securities to the Treasury, incidentally giving the gov voting control over the S&P 500, while replacing the confiscated securities with IOUs similar to the unmarketable markers in the Soc Sec trust fund. In other words, the gov quite possibly intends to take the markets down by half at some point to "save" your retirement fund by stealing it. Altogether the $7 or $8 trillion in retirement accounts will do nicely to keep the pig fest in DC going for another few years.
    • NIHON3  •  Madera, California  •  3 months ago
      Why don't all American get to put money into the same pension funds that the Service Employee Union members do? Then we could all retire with 80 to 100% of the average of our highest three income years. Talk about bankrupting the country!

      If all Americans can't have the pension dream, then no one should and they should share in our system better known as Social Security. I'm sure that they must be equivalents since we put in 6.25% versus their 8%, how much more could their retirements be worth compared to ours. 30K is the top of scales for us, 80 to 100% of their highest salary for them. Sound fair???????
    • Concerned  •  3 months ago
      The government and crooked politicians are in bed with the insurance companies...sure they would approve such a move. It will be another failed program by the government and people will realize it 20 years from now after it is too late. They are doing everything they can to pick at every cent in your 401and by the time young people retire they will have peanuts while the politicians and insurance companies become richer.
    • jim  •  Bethesda, Maryland  •  3 months ago
      See Tom's comment below. The only people who benefit from an annuity are the sales people and the insurance company. You can almost always do better on your own. Another example of government employees not understanding the real world.
    • JimH  •  3 months ago
      they could declare all 401k accounts as roth accounts which would open up thousands of jobs, but that makes to much sense
    • Hope in one hand  •  3 months ago
      I'm not much good at cipher'n, but retiring at 65 and living to 85 would be 95K/20years/12months=395.83 and that is if it did not earn a dime of interest. Seems better than "($95,000) to purchase an annuity that would provide $355 per month until the death of the last surviving spouse and annual increases for inflation."
      I'm not much up on that high finance the Government folks like Uncle Timmy and Uncle Benny but I just can't figure this one out
    • anonymous  •  3 months ago
      Obviously the big Insurance Companies have gotten their fingers in this pie. Annuities are the worse investment I ever made and when I cashed out I paid taxes as INCOME. If I had bought stock and held I would have paid 15% just like Buffet and Romney. Another joke on the little guy investor. Please google Suzy Ormond annuity to see why Suzy hates them. The insurance company get a sky high commission for signing sucker up. I have seen first hand their tricks. One being you never lose because one gets original investment back. Of course in 20 or 30 years that money is worth a tiny fraction of original investment. BEWARE
    • goog_51  •  Central Point, Oregon  •  3 months ago
      Not a good choice. Works great for the company selling them, but not for the buyer. Stay away from this option if it comes to be.
    • I cant handle the truth  •  Carrollton, Texas  •  3 months ago
      same as 10 for $10 is a better deal than $1 each
    • Anthony America  •  3 months ago
      Your the prey for the 1% like on the Wild Kingdom
    • Taco Bill  •  Roslyn, New York  •  3 months ago
      Every annuity I have ever looked at had the following provision: "Payouts are based on insurer's ability to pay". So if the economy goes to hell in a handbasket (it is well on its way now) the insured will be left holding the bag. So sorry, we're broke!

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.