Mon, May 28, 2012, 6:57 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Boeing to close Wichita plant with 2,160 jobs

Boeing to close Kan. plant with 2,160 jobs, move work elsewhere to cope with defense cutbacks

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
BA70.00-1.39

WICHITA, Kan. (AP) -- The Boeing Co., for decades the brand that helped support Wichita's claim as the aviation capital of the world, announced Wednesday it will shut down facilities in the city by the end of 2013 and send work to plants in three other states as it deals with defense spending cutbacks.

The closure will cost 2,160 workers their jobs and end the firm's presence in an area where it has been a major employer for generations.

The decision was not a surprise because Boeing said in November it was looking at closing the Wichita plant. But it still drew an angry response from Kansas lawmakers who helped Boeing land a lucrative Air Force refueling tanker project in February and had expected thousands of jobs to come to Wichita with it. Instead, the tanker work will go to Boeing's facilities near Seattle.

"Boeing's announcement is that things have changed," U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran said. "Well, the only thing that really has changed in my mind in the last year is Boeing now has the contract. When they made the commitments, they didn't."

Mark Bass, a Boeing vice president, said the market for defense work has changed dramatically in the past 18 months and the Wichita facility wasn't competitive because of its size and high labor costs. The site includes 97 buildings with 2 million square feet.

Bass declined to say how much the company expected to save by moving the work elsewhere.

Wichita had hoped the number of jobs at the facility would grow after Boeing won the contract worth at least $35 billion to build 179 Air Force refueling tankers. Modification work on the planes was expected to generate 7,500 direct and indirect jobs with an overall economic impact of nearly $390 million.

Boeing said 24 Kansas-based suppliers for the refueling tanker project will still provide parts as planned.

The first layoffs in Wichita are expected in the second half of 2012. While the Seattle area will build the tankers and handle their modifications, engineering work will move to Oklahoma City and future aircraft maintenance, modification and support will go to San Antonio, Texas.

The three states combined could pick up as many as 1,400 jobs, with Oklahoma City gaining 800 and San Antonio getting 300 to 400. The Seattle area will add 200 tanker construction jobs but about 100 support positions from there will move to Oklahoma City in the shuffle, Bass said. Wichita workers will be allowed to apply for jobs in the other locations.

Boeing said it will continue to have a significant impact on the Kansas economy and its aerospace industry. The Chicago-based company spent more than $3.2 billion with 475 Kansas suppliers last year. Kansas is the fourth largest state in its supplier network.

But that wasn't enough for lawmakers like U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, who said Boeing had promised as recently as February to remain in Wichita if it received the tanker contract. Roberts and others urged the company to reconsider.

Moran called Boeing's move "a blow to our mental health as well as our pocketbooks." Kansas officials are still willing to do what it takes to keep the Boeing plant open, but "it's difficult to negotiate with someone who hasn't kept their word," he said.

Republican Gov. Sam Brownback promised Kansas will pursue opportunities in commercial aircraft manufacturing. Aircraft makers like Cessna Aircraft Co., Hawker Beechcraft and Bombardier still have plants in Wichita, which Brownback said remains "the best place in the world to build airplanes."

Kansas Democratic Party chair Joan Wagnon said the decision shows that throwing money at wealthy corporations doesn't guarantee loyalty or longevity.

"Despite all the economic incentives and tax breaks, of which there were many, and despite the loyalty of Boeing's workers and its long history in Kansas, Boeing turned its back on a community and a state that supported the corporation generously through tough times," Wagnon said.

But the news was welcomed elsewhere.

"The decision of the Boeing Company to move tanker work to Washington is bitter-sweet," said Everett Mayor Ray Stephenson, noting Wichita Mayor Carl Brewer's support for an American-made tanker. "I was grateful for his support and am saddened for the workers and families in Wichita. That said, Everett stands ready to support additional aerospace work in the Puget Sound region."

Brewer, who once worked for Boeing, said the disappointment in Boeing's decision to abandon its 80-year relationship with Wichita and Kansas "will not diminish anytime soon." The city, county and state have invested too many taxpayer dollars in Boeing to take the announcement lightly, he said.

Boeing has had a facility in Wichita since it bought the Stearman Aircraft Co. in 1929.

Employment at the plant peaked during World War II, when its 40,000 workers included President Barack Obama's grandmother Madelyn Dunham, who worked the night shift as a supervisor on the B-29 bomber assembly line.

The company remained Wichita's largest employer for decades after the war.

It still had about 15,000 workers in the city in 2005, when it spun off its commercial aircraft operations in Kansas and Oklahoma. After the divestiture, Boeing kept 4,500 workers for its defense work in Wichita but layoffs have since slashed that number.

Spirit AeroSystems, which took over Boeing's commercial aircraft operations, still makes parts for Boeing in Wichita.

Jeremy Hill, director of Wichita State University's Center for Economic Development and Business Research, said most Boeing workers are likely to stay in the area and find other jobs. But the company's departure is a psychological blow.

"It was something that was very important to people here, something they recognized, something they would tell other people when they came and visited," Hill said. "Boeing has that name that's household and recognized, and it had a value to people when they promote the area."

___

Associated Press writers John Hanna and John Milburn contributed to this report from Topeka.

 

90 comments

  • Ardisandken  •  Winston-Salem, North Carolina  •  4 months ago
    How dare Boeing to act like a senator-say one thing and do another.......how dare them
  • JC  •  4 months ago
    Union Bashing aside from the comments, this article is not a surprise and nor is this the only plant of its type going through the same motions. With the cutback in the size of the military and the number of bases to support the military, you should expect a cut back in all of the jobs in companies that produce military supplies and equipment. What is shocking is how stupid the politicians are about this. These are the people running this country and they should be smart enough to see something like this coming. Instead, they complain about the closing and expect us to be stupid enough to not realize that it was the results of the politicians actions in Congress. We need some much smarter politicians because the ones we have now just don't cut the mustard.
    • Cotton 4 months ago
      They are not cutting back on jobs, they are only reshuffling them to get out of the pay schedule they negotiated with the people of Wichita. They still have the contract they negotiated with the gov. to build the refueling tankers. They see an opportunity to get more of that money by paying less in labor. The job was bid on the labor cost at Wichita, not those other 3 locations. They will pocket the difference.
    • go 4 months ago
      Pepsi mulls 4,000 job cuts: report
  • wild bunch  •  Denver, Colorado  •  4 months ago
    MAYBE THE KANSAS LAWMAKERS SHOULD DO WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY INSTEAD OF GETTING A CONTRACT THAT IS GOOD FOR KANSAS. NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY CONGRESS HAS A APPROVAL RATING OF 9%.
  • Billy M  •  Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  •  4 months ago
    More airplanes have been built in Wichita than the rest of the world combined. The folks in Wichita make great planes!
  • madenusa  •  Scappoose, Oregon  •  4 months ago
    Pack your Kansas trash and head to Texas,Oklahoma, or Seattle ? #$%$ ! What a choice . Kansas would be bad enough . I would pick Seattle over the other 2 . But truth be told I would not want to live in Seattle eigther . Rain does not bother me . I live in Portland , Oregon . But Seattle has the 3rd worst highway system in America . That is being real bad over alot of nastier cities in this country that come to mind . Believe me the traffic jams are atrocious in Seattle . You will want to quit the first month . Plus the cost of living is way higher there than the other 2 places . Especially relocating from Kansas . Tough choices ahead .
    • Timothy 4 months ago
      what is wrong with SATX and OKC? I just drove through both towns this week, they are booming!!!!!
  • Jacksdad  •  4 months ago
    Hope and change meets reality, again!
    • j 4 months ago
      Tell us about your reality.
  • Easy Eddieg  •  4 months ago
    With two wars winding down even a blind person could see that defense spending would be dramatically cut. When defense spending is cut, then defense jobs and contracts are cut. What is so hard to understand here. It isn't like the Kansas jobs are going to China.
    • John 4 months ago
      Actually, many of them are going to China, though maybe not these. Boeing has outsource thousands of manufacturing jobs to China, as has Airbus.
    • Gobee 4 months ago
      What about all the air craft that are worn out 10 years of war thy need to be replaced some are so worn out thy are falling out of the sky?
    • dahawk 4 months ago
      Just read today where Obama is going to drastically cut back on the number of active military personnel. Wonder what that will do to the job market?
  • User New  •  4 months ago
    About 30% of the new Boeing Dreamliner is made in other countries -- far more than the 5% in Boeing's well-known 747 airplane. In the year 2012, companies like Boeing ought to be slapped with huge penalties for outsourcing work to foreign countries. Not too mention, how is the US govt still even allowing this trend of US companies outsourcing as it has been the bane of the American economy? What a joke of a country we live in!!! Some outsourcing is good because it promotes trade, but now after a period of 25 years of outsourcing, it has to be strictly modulated because of how much it has weakened our economy. Time for US lawmakers to step up to the plate, minimize this damage, and turn the economy around!!! If a layperson like me knows this, why isn't this idea smacking every congressmen in the head everyday in Washington?
    • Gobee 4 months ago
      That is why when Boeing put the air craft together it did not fit ? outsourcing at it`s finest ! had to work 24/7 to fix it . thy just about rebuilt the air craft .
    • James 4 months ago
      Probably 80% of the planes will be bought by other countries. If they don't get a piece of the action they go to Airbus. Boeing is the biggest exporter in $ volumn in the US.
  • Kenneth  •  4 months ago
    LOL! Serves these politicians right!!
  • A Yahoo! User  •  4 months ago
    Oh the Irony!!! Boeing gets told where it can build it's plants by the same people claiming foul for them not keeping their word. "We threw them the money and they lied to us" Just too funny!!! Like Congress doesn't Lie! I do feel sorry for the workers though.
  • John  •  Fayetteville, Arkansas  •  4 months ago
    Unfortunate for the people that will lose their jobs, hopefully they'll land on their feet. The government cutting spending is obviously going to have a negative impact for some hard working Americans, but they've got to start balancing the national budget.
  • DaveBliss  •  4 months ago
    I love it when unions get in fights with other unions.
  • John  •  Elk Grove, California  •  4 months ago
    ugh, which country will now make these items??
  • Art  •  Livonia, Michigan  •  4 months ago
    If the NLRB was sane perhaps this could have been avoided.
  • Allyn  •  Arden, North Carolina  •  4 months ago
    Companies are not in business to support specific communities, they are in business to make a profit. It is as simple as that. Prople relate to workers, but not to investors who in truth own the company.
  • soylent bob  •  4 months ago
    with real estate not turning over it is real difficult to just up and move to another state. i feel for the workers and their families. just another example of large corporation putting saving a buck ahead of their employees. wonder who got a large bonus for coming up with the plan.
  • Michelle  •  4 months ago
    Hmm...it seems they depend on the government way too much. That is the danger we face in a huge government. Maybe we can learn from this before it's too late. Companies are just barely making it, and it's scary.
  • rpexplorer  •  Centro, Mexico  •  4 months ago
    Good - Payback is . . . Heck. Whats next NLRB?
  • Phyla nodiflora  •  Walnut Creek, California  •  4 months ago
    We need to cut defense spending deep enough so any state with major production is impacted. Then no one state will feel singled out. It works like a massive entitlement program for Senators and Congressmen to bring back home. Kansas will still receive more federal money per capita than they pay in federal taxes even after the move.
  • SHON_10  •  El Segundo, California  •  4 months ago
    Biggest Highlight:

    Boeing (Big Corporation) turned its back on a community and a state that supported the corporation generously through tough times.

    Throwing money at wealthy corporations doesn't guarantee loyalty or longevity!!!
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER