Sun, Feb 26, 2012, 9:13 AM EST - U.S. Markets closed

BP fails to shift $15 billion oil spill costs onto Transocean

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
RIGN.VX45.88+0.29
BP.L496.20+0.85

By Tom Bergin

LONDON (Reuters) - Oil giant BP has lost its attempt to shift over $15 billion of costs related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill onto contractor Transocean, increasing the possibility BP may have to foot the entire $42 billion clean up bill.

A U.S. federal judge on Thursday said BP must uphold a clause in its contract with Transocean Ltd that would shield the Swiss-based driller from compensatory damage claims related to the 2010 disaster.

That means London-based BP may have to shoulder alone compensation claims brought by the likes of fishermen and hoteliers whose livelihoods were affected by largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

However, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier left open the possibility that Transocean might still have to pay all or part of any punitive damages and civil penalties imposed by the U.S. government under the federal Clean Water Act.

Barbier, who oversees multistate litigation over the spill, ruled that BP need not indemnify Transocean for these.

BP has estimated civil fines of around $3.5 billion related to the spill, although maximum possible fines could top $20 billion if gross negligence was established on the part of BP or its contractors.

BP has made no provision for punitive damages because it says there is no legal basis for them. Barbier has limited the cases in which claims for punitive damages can be brought.

Thursday's decision means Transocean's potential liability over the April 20, 2010 Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion that caused 11 deaths, was "materially diminished" analysts at UBS said in a research note.

BP had previously sought to shift the whole cost of the disaster, currently estimated at around $42 billion, onto Transocean.

Shares of Transocean rose 8.2 percent at 0856 GMT, while BP shares fell 1.7 percent.

RESPONSIBILITY

Transocean owned the rig, while BP owned a majority of the Macondo well whose blowout led to the spill.

BP has said it would like to reach an out of court settlement with Transocean but Barbier's ruling makes its negotiating position weaker.

Both sides claimed victory over the ruling, which Transocean spokesman Lou Colasuonno said "discredits BP's ongoing attempts to evade both its contractual and financial obligations."

BP said the decision "holds Transocean financially responsible for any punitive damages, fines and penalties flowing from its own conduct.

"As we have said from the beginning, Transocean cannot avoid its responsibility for this accident," spokesman Daren Beaudo said in an emailed statement.

LEGAL ARGUMENTS

BP has already paid out $7 billion in claims to third parties who have suffered losses and has an outstanding provision of $8.2 billion for further claims and litigation, suggesting third party claims are expected to top $15 billion.

However, plaintiffs lawyers say compensatory claims could even end up totaling more than the $20 billion BP has set aside in its gulf coast restoration fund.

Two U.S. government probes have put most of the blame for the disaster on BP, suggesting BP is likely to face the largest share of any fines levied.

The New Orleans-based judge has set a February 27 start date for a trial to apportion blame.

The case is In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon" in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 10-md-02179.

(Writing by Tom Bergin; Additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel; Editing by Jodie Ginsberg)

 

33 comments

  • John P  •  Ventura, California  •  29 days ago
    Stop subsidizing oil!
  • J  •  Paris, France  •  29 days ago
    Stop subsidizing oil!

    How? By giving them special legal protection. we limit the damage risks associated with their operations. If Exon destroys a huge percentage of the fishing and tourist industry in Prince William Sound, they need to pay for every fish and rock. If this causes the company to go under, that is the 'real' business risk of Oil.

    If Sadam takes over the oil fields in Saudi, this is the 'real' business risk of oil. If crazy boy Hugo Chavez nationalizes his oild industry... Subsidizing with American troops is subsizing in a big way.

    So we subsidize the Hell out of Oil, then we have to subsidize Solar Energy and elecric cars to make them competitive with subsidized oil????? Who's crazy here??? Maybe we the American voting public for electing corrupt dirt bags and idiots?
  • marine  •  Jersey Shore, Pennsylvania  •  29 days ago
    DON'T WORRY THEY HAVE ANOTHER PLAN, RAISE PRICES AGAIN SO THE CITIZENS PAY THERE BILL. YOU DON'T THINK B P IS GOING TO PAY FOR THERE SCREW UP, DO YOU ?
  • Rudy  •  1 month 0 days ago
    Glad I bought Transocean stocks a couple weeks ago, at $40 flat. I was thinking of reducing the position, and now this news! Lucky :-).
  • pete  •  Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia  •  29 days ago
    There is Gross Negligence here - why wasn't a BP man on the Rig Floor, soon as the well control situation became questionable..
  • Gregg  •  Cherry Hill, New Jersey  •  29 days ago
    Deepwater Horizon oil rig survivor Daniel Baron about BP on CNN with four other survivors stated
    " You could call time out for safety,they wouldn't fire you for it but they would find another way to fire you for it"
    They all agreed.
    I hope they don't expect any protection with DOL 's new seaman protection act.It doesen't work either according to the DOL whistleblower investigator in our whistleblower case.
    This investigator told me how pathetic DOL is at protecting whistleblowers and he got the first case in the U.S under the new seaman protection act.He said Gregg i want to get out of DOL.He talked for it turned out he was a friend of my brother where they grew up together.
    If you think i'm wrong just go to the department of labor's work in progress blog comment section where we have been posting our case.It seems now DOL is not posting anymore stories but you can read what we have posted so far.
  • Mel  •  29 days ago
    let me start crying now
  • Banksters are Thieves  •  1 month 0 days ago
    BP knows they are better than the little people. They even said so. I don't buy ARCO gas anymore.
  • Yahoo! Finac  •  29 days ago
    Look how BP. tryed to shift blame to anyone but themselfs.
  • Thomas  •  Sarver, Pennsylvania  •  29 days ago
    BP is the prime contractor, thus they pay up for damages and then go after their subs to recoup monies due them from faulty performance.
  • williamm  •  Eureka, California  •  1 month 0 days ago
    The oil spill in the Gulf, was the result of faulty batteries & inspectors who were paid to not inspect! If they had checked the power for the BOP, how could they not have noticed dead batteries? I have not heard a word about who these inspectors were? BP has not commented on the cause; there are a lot of dead people & who knows the effect of such a leak on the gulf & everyone?
  • Jack  •  29 days ago
    For that matter, the article never quotes the contract clause at issue, not why BP thought it could get around it. Just something else to feed William's ignorance.

    Also, I don't see how BP gets a victory if Transocean has to pay fines and punitive damages for its own misconduct, if any. There is nothing novel about that legal result.
  • Jason  •  27 days ago
    Appeal.
  • John P  •  Ventura, California  •  29 days ago
    Stop susidzing ethanol, stop susidizing animal factory farming.
  • Jason  •  1 month 0 days ago
    I LOVE THE 'CITIZENS UNITED' RULING!

    Now I can donate any amount (for me 100 mil is like pocket-change) to get the candidate into office I feel will serve my interest best. And nobody will ever know it was me, or my company, that gave the contribution! Thank you Republican Judges for giving us, 'We the Wealthy,' the ultimate power to take America completely over.

    And for those of you who think Americans are smarter than that and will see through this... my answer to you is: Yes, many Americans are smart enough to see through this, HOWEVER, many are not.

    Have you ever dealt with those who watch Fox-News..? There is more than an ample supply of ill-informed du*b people in America that will keep me and my wealthy friends lined-up for complete control of America in the future - especially if the Republicans get back into complete control.

    The moral of the story: You can't beat the wealthy that are using every dirty, sneaky trick to stick it to you. So just get use to it and shut up... just keep doing the grunt work that makes me more wealthy while I stick it to you and your country!

    If not, I'll just find my slave labor somewhere else!

    $^D
  • bill  •  29 days ago
    Poor BP will have to give up some chump change , don,t worry BP you rip off the AMERICAN consumer that much every 2 weeks.
  • Houston  •  28 days ago
    Why are foreign companies drilling in American waters !!!!!
  • Jason  •  1 month 0 days ago
    THERE'S SOMETHING VERY WRONG IN THIS COUNTRY WHEN THE MOST SUCCESSFUL CROOK IN HISTORY (Bernie Madoff) IS LIVING BETTER IN FEDERAL PRISON THAN MILLIONS OF AMERICANS!

    Free healthcare (doesn't have to fight Wall-Street Controlled health insurance companies), three good meals a day, movies/TV, games galore, a state of the art gym, a beautiful courtyard to stroll in, etc., etc., etc. Even the convicts call the place, "Camp Fluffy!"

    Even when these Wall-Street Crooks get caught and then put away, they still manage to screw us, "We."

    THERE'S SOMETHING VERY WRONG IN THIS COUNTRY WHEN YOU HAVE TO BE DEEP IN DEBT JUST TO GET AN EDUCATION AFTER HIGH SCHOOL!

    ...VERY WRONG WHEN WALL STREET GETS BAILED OUT AND WE GET SOLD OUT AND HOMEOWNERS GET THROWN OUT BECAUSE OF WALL STREET!!

    THERE'S SOMETHING VERY WRONG IN AMERICA WHEN YOU HAVE TO LOSE YOUR HOME AND MOST OF WHAT YOU SAVED, FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILY, BECAUSE YOU GOT SERIOUSLY ILL (or injured) AFTER LOSING YOUR JOB AND HEALTH COVERAGE. Just to protect 'Wall-Street Controlled Health Care.'

    THERE'S SOMETHING VERY WRONG IN AMERICA WHEN AFTER 30 YEARS OF INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY AND CORPORATE PROFITS, THE WORKER STILL SEES HIS INCOME REMAINING STAGNET (adjusted for inflation) WHILE THE WEALTHY HAD AN ALMOST 300% INCREASE IN THEIR WEALTH! To add insult to injury, "We" bailed them out and then give them big bonuses to boot!

    ****

    America's second revolution is coming...

    ...and I predict it will start sometime in the Spring.

    You Fat-Cats should get on your private jets and go on vacation in Europe when this happens. It may not be safe for you to stay in your own country.

    You know... the country you continually sell out for MORE PROFIT!
  • Bongo Drums  •  29 days ago
    Public executions.

    I'm totally serious.
  • Yahoo! Finac  •  29 days ago
    If you want to help BP pay there fine buy there gas.I don't.
Loading...
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
18.23 -0.21 -1.14%
AOL
14.72 +0.05 +0.34%
RIMM
5.80 +0.26 +4.69%
NOK
14.89 +0.11 +0.74%
YHOO
7.13 -0.18 -2.46%
NYT
7.18 -0.06 -0.83%
RSH
39.73 +0.00 +0.00%
MMI
20.14 -0.09 -0.44%
CSCO
21.26 +0.11 +0.52%
PHG
15.21 -0.21 -1.36%
GCI
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER