Mon, May 28, 2012, 7:39 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Budget Committee Lawmakers Question Fed's Dual Mandate

Most everyone agrees that the economic recovery remains disappointingly slow. But there is no consensus on how much the Federal Reserve should do about it.

Today, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testified before the House Budget Committee about the outlook for the economy and federal budget. That outlook was much as the Federal Open Market Committee indicated after its meeting last week--near-zero interest rates may be warranted through 2014, and external pressures from Europe continue to threaten the U.S. economy. Bernanke also predicted slow growth and prolonged, elevated unemployment. However, some committee members questioned the chairman on whether addressing unemployment should be in the Fed's purview.

[The Financial War Against Iran.]

Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan, the committee chair, took aim at the Fed's focus on unemployment alongside inflation. "The Fed's tools for promoting employment are limited, imprecise, and can have highly undesirable unintended consequences," he said in his opening statement. On the other hand, he noted, "the Fed is uniquely positioned to protect the currency."

Democratic Rep. Chris Van Hollen, the ranking member, shot back in his statement. "We must use all the tools at our disposal to help put people back to work," he said, later adding, "I find it troubling that, at a time when millions of Americans are still out of work, some of our Republican colleagues want to strip the Federal Reserve of that part of its mandate that focuses on full employment and putting people back to work."

[Federal Reserve Abandons Core Consumer Price Index.]

The issue in question is the Federal Reserve's dual mandate. While the Fed once had a single mandate of controlling inflation, Congress in 1977 gave the Fed the additional goal of fostering maximum employment.

The dual mandate has come under fire for being ineffective, as policies promoting employment and price stability can sometimes be at cross purposes. The quantitative easing that the Fed undertook in response to the financial crisis is an example of a policy that some economists say can promote employment. However, massive asset purchases by the central bank can also boost inflation.

[Fed Opens Up on Interest Rate, Inflation Predictions.]

Bernanke today said that the two goals can be "complementary" and that the Fed is seeking a balanced approach between targeting inflation at 2 percent and moving the unemployment rate between 5.2 and 6 percent, which it views as a long-term goal for unemployment given current conditions.

"My concern is that this appears less to be an inflation-targeting statement than an inflation-equivocation statement," said Ryan, explaining that he fears that in focusing on lower unemployment, the Fed will allow inflation to grow too high.

[What to Look for from the Fed in 2012.]

Under questioning by Texas Republican Rep. Lloyd Doggett, Bernanke acknowledged that the Fed's tools for price stability are more effective than those it has for long-term unemployment: "The difference between inflation and unemployment is that we can control inflation in the long run. We cannot control unemployment in the long run."

The chairman also defended the Fed's record on inflation, adding that the central bank is simply doing its job. "The dual mandate has worked fine. We have as good an inflation record as any other central bank. ... That being said, Congress created the Fed, Congress gave us our mandate. If you determine that you want to change it, we will do whatever you assign us to do."

[The Federal Reserve, Now Bailing Out Politicians.]

While committee members critiqued the Fed's operations, Bernanke had his own guidance for Congress regarding the budget, advising representatives that putting fiscal policy on a sustainable path "should be a top priority."

One key area in which fiscal strains can be eased, said Bernanke, is the spiraling cost of healthcare: "I think the elephant in the room is really healthcare costs. ... We're heading towards 9 or 10 percent of GDP just for federal spending on healthcare, and another 8 or 9 percent eventually in private-sector healthcare spending."

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

More broadly, he stressed that solving the nation's fiscal problems is a matter of asking about the quality of programs, not just quantities of money spent: "Are the things we're spending on going to help our economy? Do they support R&D or workforce skills or other things that will help the economy grow in the long run?"

Learn about the many faces of Ben Bernanke.

The Financial War Against Iran.

Federal Reserve Abandons Core Consumer Price Index.



More From US News & World Report

 

13 comments

  • Me  •  3 months ago
    One of the few things the EU seemed to get right was to create their central bank with a single mandate to control the money supply/inflation. How remarkable that those 'progressives' across the pond did that, and yet we have our central bank mandated to keep employment high. Not that they aren't in a serious predicament of their own- but it has nothing to do with that aspect of their political economy.

    We, on the other hand, have given a highly autonomous organization the mandate to do so, and a blank check to fund their mission. This is misguided. Policies aimed at affecting employment should be crafted by the administration and Congress- where there is in theory at least some accountability in the form of elections. Milton Friedman had the best idea when he said a computer could be used to set rates and control the money supply. At least then we would probably have some long term stability in the dollar, and people with large egos would stop thinking they can use monetary policy to solve high unemployment - this is just not proven to work without severe side effects.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
    Remove the Federal Reserve's "maximum employment" mandate, and they'll have nothing to hide behind as they try to inflate away the badly-run banks' troubles.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  San Antonio, Texas  •  3 months ago
    In addition with tasking the Fed to destroy the currency in order to create jobs, the 95th Congress (a filibuster-proof democratic congress under Carter) also brought us the Community Reinvestment Act which was arguably a fundamental basis for the 2008 meltdown.
    • Stopper 3 months ago
      community reinvestment not responsible for the collapse of the financial markets. Pres Bush position that no regulation of the financial markets be increased, underfunding of existing financial regulators and refusal of the republican congress to ensure that banks keep a portion of their loans they start is what caused the financial debacle. this and the fact that ratings agencies that gave triple a status to poor investments are not required to make up for a portion of their failed ratings.
    • kenneth 3 months ago
      Bob: Your a liar. Read Roller's response and learn.
    • wpb 3 months ago
      The dollar is just where it was at the end of Bush's first term. The dollar is 20% higher than the Euro and Pound were when Obama took office.
  • Sever Error  •  Nashville, Tennessee  •  3 months ago
    Hey, I got an idea! How about we AUDIT THE FED and view the gap between what they are supposed to be doing (their mandates) and what they are actually doing?
    • Me 3 months ago
      Well the problem is that despite the alleged 2 mandates, they have been granted a huge regulatory role over the financial sector (banks particularly) by several administrations and Congresses over the years. We don't even need the audit to prove that. Those powers should be stripped from the FED and given to the FDIC, Office of Thrift Supervision, and SEC, and the FED should be returned to the role of simply controlling the money supply. In short, it is easy to beat up on the FED, but they didn't ask for that role, they were given it by our elected leaders. Interesting how our elected leaders moved those powers, and accountability, to the quasi- governmental, largely automous FED.
  • wpb  •  3 months ago
    The republicans are afraid the fed will help the economy grow and add jobs. They want a bad economy, that is why they have done nothing to put people back to work since they took control. The party of NO just wants to get the White House back, average americans are not even on the list of priorities.
    • Kevin 3 months ago
      Democrats, and particularly Socialist believe in forcing people to rely on government and the public sector. Low employment in the private sector equals debt, welfare and big government. which seems exactly what we have today. Debt equals dependence which equals control. wake up and see whats right.
    • MVT2216 3 months ago
      Hey, Kevin, we live in a mixed economy. The government is an essential component for the growth of the private sector and has been since LIncoln's time. It is the biggest purchaser in the world, buying tons of goods from the private sector (e.g., defense, petroleum reserve, agricultural stockpiles). It supports the growth of nuclear energy and manages the nuclear stockpile. It funds most public health efforts through the CDC and HHS. It funds basic research and subsidizes housing (only 30% or so of the population would own their own homes without Federal backing). It provides a safety net for the unemployed ('wait till you lose your job sometime and see how critical those monthly payments are'). It is the largest information producing organization in the world through its information agencies (e.g., NOAA, NCHS, CIA). I could go on and on but the reality is that the Federal government is an essential part of the economy that the private sector depends on. Without that public commitment, most small businesses would collapse (as happened during the Great Depression) and unemployment would be pushing 20% (with effective unemployment being in the 30% range). So, be thankful for what we have and 'don't kill the golden goose', to use an old cliche.
    • kenneth 3 months ago
      I agree.
  • rocky  •  3 months ago
    Europe is the blueprint for Obimbo's policies. Europe has 6 or 7 countries on the brink of falure. Obimbo wants the USA to be just like them. Obimbo leave my country alone.
    • DH 3 months ago
      if you want your country to get well, better start blaming the correct people: Congress. Obimbo cannot spend one dime.
  • Phyla nodiflora  •  Walnut Creek, California  •  3 months ago
    At the present the Fed would not do anything different whether it included a "maximum employment" mandate or just controls interest. It is short sighted however to remove the employment element when the interests may compete in the future and we require a balance between the two.
  • Kaos  •  Plainfield, Connecticut  •  3 months ago
    HERE democrats read this and tell me why any Republican should except more policies to ruin our country! They vote against his policy because they are horrible for our country. duh............

    The Congressional Budget Office projects that the national debt under President Obama’s policies will rise to $21.665 trillion by 2022, according to its updated budget outlook.

    The updated outlook, released Tuesday, found that current Obama administration policies will result in a 50 percent increase in debt held by the public and a 40 percent increase in intra-governmental debt held in the trust funds of entitlement programs.

    “In CBO’s projections, debt held by the public is expected to increase by more than 50 percent between the end of 2011 and the end of 2022, and debt held by government accounts is expected to rise by nearly 40 percent,” the CBO report found.

    As a result of this rise in federal debt, CBO projects federal debt will reach $21.7 trillion by 2022.

    “As a result, gross federal debt is projected to climb every year from 2012 to 2022, reaching $21.7 trillion in 2022—47 percent more than its total of $14.8 trillion at the end of 2011.”
    • Kaos 3 months ago
      Whats wrong libs.....don't like FACTS on DEBT. Blame the CBO.......
    • kenneth 3 months ago
      Don't forget unfunded wars, wall street greed,and corporate welfare.
  • MVT2216  •  Houston, Texas  •  3 months ago
    The Republicans on the committee are being too short sighted in their focus. I am glad the Fed is independent and has a dual mandate. Sometimes it works for the party in power and sometimes it doesn't. The Republicans who question the Fed's policies are obviously concerned that those policies will help the economy during an election year (i.e., Obama will be the beneficiary of those policies). But, they forget that the Fed has taken positions in the past that helped the Republicans and not the Democrats. During Jimmy Carter's last year in office, the Fed (under Paul Volker) raised interest rates to around 20% to counter inflation, essentially bringing the economy to a screeching halt. The Carter administration was hurt by that policy. It was probably the single most important factor in his defeat and the election of Reagan. As I said, sometimes the party in power wins and sometimes it doesn't. But, from a national perspective, it is critical that the Fed remain independent and have the dual mandate. Look at Europe where the central banks have only a mandate to control inflation; they are in recession and their inflation rates are actually higher than ours. Their central banks cannot do anything to stimulate their economies, which plod along with high unemployment and little growth. So, Republicans, think carefully before demanding that the Fed drop the low unemployment mandate. What would you rather have, a European economy that has no growth or a U.S. economy which is plugging along (slowly, but surely)?
  • Newt  •  Pontiac, Michigan  •  3 months ago
    www.fairtax.org
    sign it and make a difference
  • Upstate  •  Syracuse, New York  •  3 months ago
    Of course Ryan is going to claim that he is smarter than the members of the Fed. He is a Republican in an election year when the president is a Democrat. Being a member of the party that is out of power in an election year always makes you much smarter than anyone who is a part of the opposing party's administration...
  • wpb  •  3 months ago
    Why is it that the republicans don't want to be like Europe, except when it fits with their own misguided thinking. Europe's central bank has a single mandate, inflation. How's that working out?
  • Vic  •  3 months ago
    Now I'm revealing it to anybody who wants to learn, the fact that the entire Gold market doesn't really go up and down in price by the dynamics of buying and selling, but rather is controlled by a computer. Visit GoId.Trading.Academy.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER