Mon, May 28, 2012, 8:45 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

China bars its airlines from paying EU carbon tax

China bars its airlines from paying EU carbon tax, ratcheting up global dispute

BEIJING (AP) -- China announced Monday it will prohibit its airlines from paying European Union charges on carbon emissions, ratcheting up a global dispute over the cost of combatting climate change.

The charges are aimed at curbing emissions of climate-changing gases but governments including China, the United States and Russia oppose them. The ratings agency Fitch warned in December the conflict could spiral into a global trade dispute.

The Chinese air regulator said China's carriers are barred from paying the charges or other fees without government permission, the official Xinhua News Agency reported. It said Beijing will consider unspecified measures in response to protect Chinese companies.

There was no indication there would be any immediate impact on flights between China and Europe or penalties for Chinese airlines. The charges took effect in January but money will not be collected until next year.

The dispute highlights Beijing's complicated status in global climate efforts.

China is the biggest source of climate-changing gases but as a developing country is exempt from Kyoto Protocol emission limits. Owners of Chinese power plants and factories have received billions of dollars from a European system that pays developing countries to curb emissions but Beijing has resisted binding limits.

Under the European system, airlines flying to or from Europe must obtain certificates for carbon dioxide emissions. They will get free credits to cover most flights this year but must buy or trade for credits to cover the rest.

"China objects to the EU's decision to impose the scheme on non-EU airlines," Xinhua quoted a statement by the Civil Aviation Administration of China as saying.

The European Union ambassador to Beijing, Markus Ederer, defended the charges as consistent with Europe's efforts to be a "green leader" in curbing climate change and said they treat European and foreign carriers equally.

Ederer said it was too early to consider questions such as whether Chinese carriers might be compelled to pay. He said EU regulations include a provision to exempt carriers from countries with "equivalent measures" to curb carbon emissions.

"We are ready to engage in a discussion on recognizing the equivalent measures which would then exempt those airlines of those countries from the necessary dues that would have to be paid," he said at a previously scheduled news conference on EU relations with China.

Ederer said that with free credits taken into account, the added cost per passenger on a flight from Beijing to Brussels, the EU capital, would be 17.50 yuan or 1.90 euros ($2.70).

"I leave it to you to make a judgment on whether this is too much for saving the Earth, combating climate change and making headway together," he said.

Environmentalists welcomed the European program, one of the most far-reaching measures adopted by any government to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Although only 3 percent of total human-caused carbon emissions come from aircraft, aviation is the fastest-growing source of carbon pollution.

U.S. airlines, supported by governments including China and India, filed a legal challenge to the charges but the EU's highest court upheld them in December.

Beijing could have unusually strong leverage in a possible dispute because its state-owned airlines carry large numbers of Chinese and other Asian tourists to Europe. Any disruption would hurt Europe's travel industry when the continent is struggling with a debt crisis and high unemployment.

The International Air Transport Association has criticized the charges as "market distorting." It says the EU should negotiate through the International Civil Aviation Organization to reach a global agreement.

IATA, which represents about 240 airlines that carry 84 percent of global air traffic, estimates the new rules will cost airlines up to 900 million euros ($1.2 billion) this year and rise to 2.8 billion euros in 2020.

Ederer said the EU was open to discussing the issue through ICAO.

___

Civil Aviation Administration of China (in Chinese): www.caac.gov.cn

 

51 comments

  • Preybrother  •  Richardson, Texas  •  3 months ago
    So much for the carbon credits scam. At least China has enough sense not to fall for it.
  • Todd  •  Seoul, South Korea  •  3 months ago
    And the EU wants China to "invest" in their failing economies to help avoid a Eurozone breakup? Good luck with that!
  • Jalal  •  3 months ago
    All countries should unite like China to impose this ban. UAE should do quick as they have Emirates and Etihad airlines. European Union charges are unfair!
  • Brent  •  Tulsa, Oklahoma  •  3 months ago
    The chinese know a scam when they see one. Money for nothing.
  • cs  •  Independence, Missouri  •  3 months ago
    So exactly where is the 900 million euros going and how will it be spent to combat globle warming? Feels like a Government scam to make-up some of the lost in it's tax base.
  • nogo  •  3 months ago
    charging a carbon tax because they're going broke and need mo money to pay the unions and the liberals are banking on the system
    • Joe 3 months ago
      It's a process. The Liberals create larger and larger govt, then the Fascist come along and take it away, round up and dispose of all the Liberals using that big govt. The whole thing falls apart and the process begins all over.
  • Charlie  •  Galesburg, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    One fart from a volcano puts out more carbons in to the atmosphere than all manmade carbon in the world do in 10 yrs. ( History Channel on Hawaii's Volcano's) There are 55 active in the world.
    Global Warming always comes before the Ice Age which scientists have proven that happens every 12,000 yrs which is only 2000 yrs. to the next. ( History Channel on the making of the Great Lakes ) scientist can count as many as 12 times this has occurred and say it will again in about 2000 yrs. even if we shut everything off that creates carbon emissions.

    I suggest all of you green people go protest a volcano and see if it listens to you.

    This planet will shake us off like a bad case of fleas when it wants
    • Hasbro 3 months ago
      I wish people like you would stop spewing all of these facts! It just #$%$ the liberals off & puts a smile on my face.... lol.
    • Charlie 3 months ago
      Hasbro it's just a great way to start my work week.
  • Jimmie  •  3 months ago
    Just think.
    The Commie Chinese government is the only one standing up to Al Gore's Big Fat Lie.
  • waicin  •  Pleasanton, California  •  3 months ago
    Why USA not say our airlines will not pay EU carbon also ,EU is not our alliance anymore,they just want our money to save their #$%$
    • Katy C 3 months ago
      The EU wouldn't ever get our money, but rather the money we borrow from China to give to the EU.
  • Ralph  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
    Finally, something I agree with China on. What a bunch of morons. Everyone is broke but we need a carbon tax. Lets just kill all the Liberals on the planet and that would reduce the carbon foot print by half....hum.
    • AADH 3 months ago
      I think you have just came up with the solution to save the world, I don't know why no environmentalist ever thought of it. It would also solve the world food crisis and it would be a killing for gun companies.
    • shane 3 months ago
      You fellas are cruel. Killing Liberals. Small thoughts there. Killing is NOT the solution. Sterilization IS.
  • Charlie  •  Galesburg, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    “It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.
  • Charlie  •  Galesburg, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    “Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”
  • Lucky  •  Hobart, Australia  •  3 months ago
    2.70 ... cheap ,but why pay for global warming hoax ,,,good on You China
  • Charlie  •  Galesburg, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    “The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata. # #
  • Charlie  •  Galesburg, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
  • health1_au  •  3 months ago
    Here is a little joke for you:

    Q: How many meddling do-gooders does it take to screw in a light bulb?
    A: All of them, plus one.
  • gbhsgbhs  •  3 months ago
    Carbon tax. See what happens when you give up typewriters and carbon paper for computers and inkjet printers! What's next? Beaver skins and whale oil tax?!
  • JoeBagaDoughnuts  •  3 months ago
    2010 frozen oranges in Florida. 2012 frozen palm trees in the South of France. Is that global warming? Carbon Diozide tax is a tax on breathing out. It puts us at a competative disadvantage to China and India who can fuel their industries with cheap energy. You have been brainwashed by the Globalist elite.
    • John 3 months ago
      It is not strictly speaking correct to say that a particular tax puts us at a competitive disadvantage. It is the total level of taxation that defines how competitive we are as this adds to the total cost of doing business. If the EU would offset this new tax with a commensurate reduction in other taxes then total level of taxation would stay level and the overall competitive position of the EU globally would remain roughly the same. Of course, this would perhaps distort which EU industries are the most competitive to some degree, but that is in fact the point: to change behaviour to generate profits with less air travel.

      Of course, I doubt that the EU will offset this additional tax with any kind of tax reduction elsewhere.
  • Art  •  3 months ago
    At least China is smart enough not to be believe the global warming/climate change fraud.
  • scott h  •  Dallas, Texas  •  3 months ago
    That's not very nice. The Chinese don't want to play.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER