Mon, May 28, 2012, 8:01 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Conflict between rich, poor strongest in 24 years

As politics heat up, wealth gap creating more conflict than issues of immigration, race, age

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Tensions between the rich and poor are increasing and at their most intense level in nearly a quarter-century, a new survey shows. Americans now see more social conflict over wealth inequality than over the hot-button topics of immigration, race relations and age.

The survey released Wednesday by the Pew Research Center highlights U.S. perceptions of the economic divide, an issue that has moved to the forefront in the 2012 presidential campaign amid stubbornly high unemployment, increasing poverty and protests by the Occupy movement.

The findings come as voters in New Hampshire's primary Tuesday night made clear that the economy was the issue that mattered most to them. In the end, they chose Mitt Romney by a large margin, even as Republican rivals already gearing up for more competitive contests in South Carolina and elsewhere had stepped up populist attacks on him as a heartless corporate raider who slashed jobs.

President Barack Obama has been promoting a campaign message of middle-class opportunity, calling for higher taxes on the very rich and successfully pushing a two-month extension of a payroll tax cut.

The Pew survey shows that younger adults, Democrats and African-Americans remained the most likely as in previous years to cite the existence of strong disagreements between rich and poor. But in the last two years, three important swing groups — whites, middle-income Americans and political independents — registered some of the biggest increases in those who now also hold this view.

As a result, majorities of each political party and ideology all agree that serious disputes exist between Americans at the top and bottom of the economic ladder.

Still, while overall U.S. awareness of class conflict has grown significantly in recent years, public attitudes toward wealthy Americans remain largely unchanged.

For instance, about 46 percent of Americans hold a disapproving view that rich people are wealthy because they were fortunate enough to be born into money or have the right connections. But almost as many people — 43 percent — say wealthy people are rich "mainly because of their own hard work, ambition or education."

That suggests some people who see more conflict between the classes may believe that anger toward the rich is misdirected.

A recent Gallup survey also found that fewer than half of Americans said reducing the gap between rich and poor is "extremely" or "very important," compared with more than 8 in 10 who said policies to build economic growth should be a high priority for government.

"These changes in attitudes over a relatively short period of time may reflect the income and wealth inequality message conveyed by Occupy Wall Street protesters across the country in late 2011 that led to a spike in media attention," said Pew survey analyst Richard Morin. "But the changes also may reflect a growing public awareness of underlying shifts in the distribution of wealth in American society."

In recent weeks, a slew of recent census data have illustrated a widening divide, including the share of overall U.S. wealth held by the top 10 percent of the population that increased from 49 percent in 2005 to 56 percent in 2009. A separate census measure also found that a record number of Americans — nearly 1 in 2 — have fallen into poverty or make earnings that typically classify them as low income.

"As the presidential campaign begins in earnest, it is reasonable to expect that these issues will be a part of the political dialogue," Morin said.

About 3 in 10 Americans polled said there are "very strong" conflicts between the rich and poor, according to the independent research group. That is double the share who believed so in July 2009 and the largest proportion reporting that view in the 24 years the question has been asked in surveys.

In all, about 66 percent of those polled now say there are "very strong" or "strong" conflicts between the top and bottom income groups.

In contrast, a slightly smaller share of Americans — 62 percent — said there were "very strong" or "strong" conflicts between immigrants and native-born Americans. Even smaller shares of people saw such levels of conflict between blacks and whites (38 percent) and between young and old (34 percent).

That is a change from 2009, when immigration topped the survey list as causing the strongest levels of social conflict. At that time, about 55 percent reported "very strong" or "strong" conflict between immigrants and native-born Americans, compared to 47 percent who saw such conflict between the rich and poor.

Other findings:

—Perceptions of class conflict grew for Americans of all income groups since 2009. The share increased by 17 percentage points, to 64 percent, among those earning less than $20,000; it rose 18 points, to 67 percent, among those making $75,000 or more. The increase was largest among middle-income Americans earning between $40,000 and $75,000 — rising 24 points to 71 percent.

—Since 2009, the share of whites who see serious class conflicts between rich and poor grew by 22 percentage points to 65 percent. That is roughly triple the increase among blacks and Hispanics. About 74 percent of blacks and 61 percent of Hispanics saw serious conflicts.

—About 73 percent of self-described Democrats said there were serious class conflicts, an 18 percentage point increase from 2009. The increase among Republicans was nearly as large, rising 17 points to 55 percent. The biggest increase was among political independents, jumping 23 points to 68 percent.

Pew based its findings on interviews with 2,048 adults by cell phone or landline from Dec. 6-19, 2011. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.9 percentage points for all respondents, higher for subgroups.

___

AP Deputy Polling Director Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this report.

___

Online:

Pew Social & Demographic Trends: http://pewsocialtrends.org/

 
  • David  •  4 months ago
    The fundamental "class conflict" is over distribution of opportunity, not distribution of wealth. Many of us remember when almost any capable person in America who was willing to work, save, and invest could raise themselves from poverty to at least a comfortable middle class lifestyle. Problem is, that day is gone, and the jobs that formed the lower-to-middle rungs (and some of the upper-middle rungs) of the economic ladder have gone, largely out-sourced to cheaper labor pools overseas. While opportunities for climbing the wealth ladder still exist, these are more and more limited to those whose extraordinary abilities happen to connect with an extraordinary opportunity. The average capable person won't work their way up from a factory floor to a directorship at a company because the factory is in India and the directors are hired out of Harvard and Yale. For the sake of the country, what we need is to turn a deaf ear both to (1) the redistributive socialists whose attitude is "let's share, now give me yours" and (2) the social Darwinist, Ayn Rand types who think "winner take all" is good social policy. Instead, our goal must be to replace or rebuild those missing strata of economic opportunities that enabled people of reasonable capability to rise or fall based on effort and frugality.
    • N 4 months ago
      Moral of the story: Be the right one at the right place at the right time. If you don't, tough!
    • Edward Davis 4 months ago
      Generally, I agree with you. But know this, "economics" is NOT natural law. Any economic system is an invention, any being such, it is subject to all the perversions and misappropriations that human beings can impose on it. Therefore, the term “opportunity” may be misplaced, as it is decidedly not an even playing field.
    • Bart 4 months ago
      I am dismayed that most people seem to think in terms of idealogies, e.g. your redistributive socialists and social Darwinists. Few just look at the facts of what has been best for the country in the past.
  • Ray  •  4 months ago
    You used to be able to drive a truck or work at a factory job and still be able to raise a family and go on nice vacations. Now, real incomes have dropped and the price of everything has gone up. Even with two incomes, many families are considered working poor. Education is important, and so is the willingness to move to a new location for better opportunities.
    • lowtolerance 4 months ago
      what, pray tell, would this new, better, location be called? good luck with that. as for that education, is two degrees not enough? better be. I'm done. F it.
    • ILuvCats 4 months ago
      Many people are not able to get a good education, thru no fault of their own. Some people are just not bright enough. Those folks used to be able to earn a good living, but cannot anymore.
    • Da Bears 4 months ago
      you used to also not need a tv and a radio was considered a luxury... now you somehow need 3 cars, a tv in every room, a large house... It's weighted on BOTH sides.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  4 months ago
    History repeats itself no matter what age we live in.
  • Gregory  •  4 months ago
    I'm wealthy and know the average citizen is getting the shaft right now. The current tax system is a joke.
    • Mike 4 months ago
      Then bone up and send in every dime you make to help the cause!
    • Kaos 4 months ago
      Stop lying first off .....
    • independant1 4 months ago
      How so gregory, do we pay too much, not enough, how about those who pay non yet receive from the government - us. Don't understand your comment. I would like to see a fair tax, flat tax, not income tax. My husband is retired but before he did with the highest income bracket, plus state, plus social secirity he paid almost 60% of his income, is that enough?
  • tdough  •  4 months ago
    Some people are such fools that couldn't talk economics if their lives depended on it.. The country is heading for the toilet.. For those of you with young children. Good luck,, you will need it in 20 years when unemployment is rising to 30-40%.. We don't need people for a lot of things because of technology.. This country has outsourced a absurd number of good jobs to get bonuses for the CEO and shareholders.. They call it globalization but its exploiting labor.. Do your homework before posting things people..
    • Darrel From Zeeland 4 months ago
      That's capitalism and free enterprise. Go live in Russia, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, France, Sweden, Canada, or some other commie socialist libturd shithole and suck on big thick greasy veiny uncircumsized commie Marxist #$%$ if you don't like it, KOMRADE!!
    • Mel 4 months ago
      "This country has outsourced a absurd number of good jobs to get bonuses for the CEO and shareholders.."

      You said it right!
  • GianniA  •  Mililani Town, Hawaii  •  4 months ago
    There's a lot of cake to be eaten...
    • travis b 4 months ago
      Let them eat it. I will continue ordering delivery every night.
    • tsjay 4 months ago
      boy I wish i had some cake right now....with a big glass of milk....
  • Frodo  •  4 months ago
    Want lower taxes? Hire a lobbyist.
  • imgamekc  •  4 months ago
    Only a fool believes what is going on is "capitalism" with protected markets, unholy alliances and the inability for new companies to go into certain areas. Days of bought and sold defense contracts and other government crony capitalism is much more the proper term!
  • Cal G  •  Baton Rouge, Louisiana  •  4 months ago
    If we could spontaneously eliminate all of the corruption from government we would all be instantly well off.
  • Gregory  •  4 months ago
    This happens in countries with a disappearing middle class.
  • AmericansFirst  •  4 months ago
    Perot predicted as a presidential candidate our US policy would turn the US into a ghetto !

    Gebhardt as presidential candidate said the economy had been no good since Congress switched from a full employment goal to a planned economy goal in about 77-78!
  • Robert  •  Albuquerque, New Mexico  •  4 months ago
    So NAFTA as well as all those tax cuts for the rich have done their job ? We allow illegals to stay here driving down wages, we allow companies to ship their jobs overseas even finance the moves with tax breaks , this has been going on for at least 30 years wakeup !!!
  • prejudicefreedom  •  4 months ago
    The problem is the Constitution is not being followed the Feds have taken over and have over taxed us. We create fake money and buy debt? The free market is all we need to fix this country. The chance for any one to have an idea and become wealthy. America is not about you get to be some lazy dumb person and yet what take the money from those who worked hard? That is not OK at all.
  • Victor  •  4 months ago
    This country would be fine if the government operated the way it is or was set up to operate. Being a Congressman and Representatives was not a full time job, they went to Washington did what they were there to do and went back home to there JOB. They got a stipend for there work in D.C. and then went back to WORK. They didn't have a pension that paid them for life for doing nothing, they didn't get befefits they paid for there's just like everyone else. Let me tell you Congress and House members you are not any more special than Joe Blo the Rag Man. In fact you do less for the American people than ever before in the history of this country. You gave you your pay raises and your mediical Bennies and your Life Long Pay and you did it on your own, WE THE PEOPLE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT IT BECAUSE IF WE DID HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH IT YOU #$%$ SURE WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN IT ANYTHING ELSE YOU VOTED IN FOR YOURSELVES. You are the ones that are bankrupting this country and you cannot deny it. YOU are greedy and self important and could really care less for this country or its people. Talk about Social Security being a INTITLEMENT you #$%$ we the common people have paid into that for our total work life and you have paid nothing for yours you just expect use to pay for it for you NOW THAT IS AN INTITLEMENT. Also how dare you give it to those that haven't paid a dime into it. It is not us old retiring #$%$ that are running it into the ground it you and giving it to every Swinging Dick that ask's for it and haven't done a thing to get it. Why don't you guys pay all of the IOU's that you have put into the Social Security Fund with the money that we the people pay you or elso keep your #$%$ _ _ _ _ hands off it for a change. One turm and no bennies or pay after that is up you go home and get a real JOB like the rest of us and pay your our way.
  • Finkle is Einhorn  •  Albany, New York  •  4 months ago
    The top needs to stop being jerks and the bottom needs to work harder. We in the middle are sick of getting screwed by both ends.
  • anna  •  San Mateo, California  •  4 months ago
    Vote whoever supports your favorite social issue regardless of party because none of the the candidates have the will or power to fix the economy. That ship has sailed. Reality and a revolution of sorts will fix the economy if it's ever fixed, otherwise concentrate on how you and your family plan to survive in the new world order. And, if you don't know what the new world order is about, you're becoming extinct so it won't matter
  • tsjay  •  4 months ago
    This is a no brainer ! I don't care about black/white, straight/gay,young/old, if I aint got no MONEY in my pockets, all of that #$%$ is a non factor !! Let me get a hot meal, and a roof over my head..then we can argue over the silly #$%$, like race, religion, and so forth.
  • MR. WHITE AMERICA  •  Honolulu, Hawaii  •  4 months ago
    Time has come for all Americans to pay attention to who we vote for in government. We must watch those who are elected and see if they are looking out for our countries interest not their own. Too many lobbiest have too much power in Washington. Its come time if we, the people, do not watch our government and their decisions, our country will cease to be the greatest country on earth. Our next election is very important, know the facts and know what the candidate's history is! Mr. Ron Paul seems to be the only honest man in the race. How many of the rich peoples kids fight in Iraq and Afgan.....none!!! Its always the poor...I'm army disabled 100% and most military is people who can not find jobs or that have been lied to...ex-Iraq-weapons of mass destruction, Afgan-get Ben Laden (do not tell the military but we want the taliban too). We are not Nation Builders...Take care of AMERICANS -health care, food, heat, 415 TRILLION DEBT...we need to straiten our own country before we build others!
  • Tim  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  4 months ago
    All of that other crap is a non factor, when you can't afford a roof over your head, or a meal on the table, I could have told them this !
  • TheReality  •  4 months ago
    These tensions are created by the socialist media and the entitlement generation. If you haven't earned it, you don't deserve it.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER