Mon, May 28, 2012, 8:02 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Congress moves toward ending payroll tax cut fight

    Both parties' leaders hoping to end battle over payroll tax cut as Congress gets ready to vote

    Fantasy Finance

    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The GOP-controlled House passed legislation Friday renewing a payroll tax cut for 160 million workers and jobless benefits for millions more, backing the main items on President Barack Obama's jobs agenda in a rare burst of Washington bipartisanship.

    The Senate was expected to quickly follow and send the measure to the White House for Obama to sign into law.

    Under Friday's measure, workers would continue to receive a two percentage point increase in their paychecks and people out of work for more than six months would keep jobless benefits averaging about $300 a week, steps that Obama says will help support the fragile recovery from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

    The legislation, passed by a surprisingly large 293-132 vote, would also head off a steep cut in reimbursements for physicians who treat Medicare patients. The tax cuts, jobless coverage and higher doctors' payments would all run through 2012.

    Passage of the legislation also hands Obama a political win over objections from many Republicans who oppose it but were eager to wipe the issue from the election-year agenda. Opposition was particularly strong in the Senate, where Republicans signaled they would allow the measure to pass with a simple majority — instead of the filibuster-proof 60 votes typically required. That was a signal they want the measure to pass but don't want to vote for it and the $89 billion it would add to the nation's $15 trillion-plus debt.

    Extending the 2 percentage-point cut in the 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax would save around $80 monthly for someone earning $50,000 a year and give a maximum cut of $2,200 to high-end earners.

    Friday's vote clears away a political headache for House Republicans, who blocked a two-month extension of the tax cut and jobless coverage in late December, only to retreat quickly under a buzz saw of opposition from conservative and GOP leaders from around the country.

    With that history, Republicans seemed ready to get the fight behind them and change the subject for the rest of this election year. And they said the final deal, significantly changed from a tea party-backed measure that passed in December, was the best Republicans could get.

    "We don't control Washington. Democrats still control Washington — they control the Senate and they control the White House," said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., the top House negotiators on the measure. "A divided government must still govern." Camp cited stricter job search requirements for people receiving unemployment benefits and other reforms to the program as wins for conservatives.

    But many GOP lawmakers were upset that the measure would add to the federal deficit and doubted that it would do much to boost the economy. Another concern was that it cuts a payroll tax that's dedicated to paying Social Security benefits. Deficit spending would make up for the lost revenue, but some lawmakers fear it would chip away at the program.

    "I cannot and I will not support legislation that extends the payroll tax holiday without paying for it," said Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga. "This will add $100 billion to the deficit and it will create an even greater shortfall within the Social Security trust fund that already has over $100 billion shortfall just in the last two years."

    And the No. 2 Democrat in the House, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, excoriated the measure for cutting the retirement benefits of new federal hires.

    "The only individuals paying for this bill out of 315 million Americans are the two million civilian workers who work for us, who work for all of us, who day after day, week after week, month after month," Hoyer said.

    Some Democratic senators were defecting because of cuts the bill would make for civil servants' benefits and health programs. Many Republicans were opposed because the measure would add $89 billion to federal deficits over the coming decade.

    The reduction in the Social Security payroll tax, which is deducted from workers' paychecks, would cost $93 billion through 2022. In a sudden concession this week that made bipartisan agreement possible, House Republicans dropped their demand that the tax cut be paid for with spending reductions.

    In a GOP win, coverage for the long-term unemployed would be cut from the current maximum of 99 weeks to a ceiling of 73 weeks by this fall in states with the worst job markets, with most topping out at 63 weeks.

    The $30 billion cost of the extended benefits would be paid for half by government sales of parts of the nation's broadcast airwaves, half by requiring federal workers hired after this year to contribute an additional 2.3 percent of their pay for their pensions, up from the current 0.8 percent.

    That increase also would apply to members of Congress, but only those who begin service as of next January — exempting every current lawmaker.

    The bill also would prevent a 27 percent cut in federal payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients, a reduction that threatened to make it harder for seniors to find physicians.

    That would cost about $18 billion. It would be paid for by trimming Medicare reimbursements to health care providers to cover unpaid medical bills, cutting payments to hospitals that treat large numbers of poor patients and cutting a fund created in Obama's health care overhaul for preventing diseases caused by smoking and obesity.

    A House-approved measure letting states test unemployment benefit applicants for drug testing was pared back, permitting the tests only for people who lost their jobs due to drug use or whose new jobs would require such tests.

    Those seeking unemployment coverage would have to show they are actively seeking work, but another GOP-backed provision forcing them to pursue high school equivalency diplomas was abandoned.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

     
    • Tsalagi Elder  •  Toronto, Canada  •  3 months ago
      Interesting that after the debt ceiling "debate" last summer Congress passed the Budget Control Act to cut expenditures immediately by 900 billion....this new bill on the payrol tax etc increases the deficit by 150 billion in 1 year,,,so much budget controll!!

      Given this..it is worth looking at the history of recent budget forecasts of the projected increases in the national debt...

      For example in January 2009 the CBO forecasted (based on then government policy and a somewhat rosy economic forecast) that the total increase in the national debt for the TEN years 2010-2019 would be $3.1 trillion.

      The actual increase in the national debt in the first TWO YEARS..ie.2010-2011 was $2.6 trillion and the President's budget tabled last week projects a deficit in 2012 of $1.3 trillion ..giving a total of $3.9 trillion for the first THREE YEARS

      Soooo...the total accululated deficit in the first three yearshas already exceeded the January 2009 10 year accummulated deficit by $800 billion..and there is still 7 years to go!!

      Fast forward to January 2012...the current 10 year forecasted accululated increase in the national debt is close to $7 trillion....more than double the 2009 estimate

      Doesn't give me a warm and fuzzy that the national debt will not skyrocket way past the current (January 2012) 10 year forecast of an accululated increase in the debt of close to $7 trillion...especially when politicians are rapidly undoing the budget cutting they agreed to do a scant 8 months ago and congratulating themselves on their "success"!!!
      • Jack Ace 3 months ago
        Liar the federal benefit cuts, sale of airwaves pays for the bill!
      • Tsalagi Elder 3 months ago
        The sale of the airwaves was going to happen anyway..you need a lesson in politics 101..

        But...the actual facts on budget control are already baked in the cake..

        The Jan CBO forecast for the accululated deficit for FY2010-2012 inclusive was...$1.46 trillion..the actual wil be close to $3.9 trillion..167% higher!!

        Just by way of contrast..for FY 2010..the Canadian budget forecast was for a deficit of $41 billion and the actual result was $36 billion.....that is called budget discipline!!! The other thing to note is that the Canadian economy is about one-tenth of the US economy...so the budget deficit as a share of GDP is about a third of that in the US and Canada is forecasted to have a budget SURPLUS in FY 2015 and start to pay down the national debt
    • me  •  Richardson, Texas  •  3 months ago
      Repeal the Commodities Modernization Act of 2000
    • J  •  Milan, Italy  •  3 months ago
      so politicians agree to forgo 100 billion in revenue, and add 150 billion in spending. And both sides call it a success.....
    • Ragan  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  3 months ago
      Ok so I’ve been quiet for a long time now but I am totally disgusted by the amount of people that when and voted in the primaries within my state. My wife and I made up 1% of the total voters!!!!!! (Do the math). I now feel that nobody wants any change they just want things to go on as they are. How SAD.
      • Kathleen 3 months ago
        Perhaps those that do not vote have just given up on everything... Perhaps their thinking runs along the lines that no matter which way an election goes, it just keeps getting worse because both parties are the SAME... They say they are different, but what is the difference is on group say 6+6=12.. and the other one argues "no way, it's 4x3 that equals 12...
      • Mr 3 months ago
        Or.....non-voters have the "don't bite the hand that is feeding you...."
      • CHAD FAN 3 months ago
        200 people voted. Am I correct?
    • Equal Justice 2010  •  3 months ago
      They held the majority in BOTH HOUSES.
      WHAT DID THEY DO?????
      What a joke the SENATE still has the MAJORITY they tell Democrats
      WE CARE!!!
      Yet what have the done NOTHING!!!!!!
      For many years they have been telling the base this lie, yet YOU ARE NO BETTER.
      They mislead you to make you look at Congress.
    • B-Daddy - gonna B Ur Dadd ...  •  Doylestown, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
      Flat Tax please.. Wage Earners are getting screwed.. We are the ones payign the highest rates..I thinkg 35% is way to much .. Basically I make 65 Cents for every dollar i earn..
      • Dear Clueless 3 months ago
        Right there with you with one small edit; the government takes 35 Cents of every dollar I earn.
      • We The People 3 months ago
        Right there with you too but lets not forget states like Arizona and many more also take a piece of that 65% with more state income tax and then add all the other sales taxes on everything you use and you are well over 50% or half of everything you make the government takes. This is insane and must be stopped.
    • Harry  •  3 months ago
      I believe the payroll cut is just for employees and not for employers....
    • shaunm  •  Riverview, Florida  •  3 months ago
      This is and always will be a political giveaway item, conveniently veiled in economic stimulus policy. At the end of it all, it's money we don't have, and respresents the proverbial "can kick".
    • Mr  •  3 months ago
      2000 Clinton Budget: $1.8 trillion
      2013 Obama Budget: $3.8 trillion

      We have added 11% to the population in that time yet the budget has more than DOUBLED? (NOTE: Bush tax cuts = $80 billion/year and wars are $220/billion/year so that's only $300 billion of it)
      • H 3 months ago
        We do have that many illegals.
    • Everybodys All American  •  3 months ago
      Taking money out of the Social Security fund in this manner is another desperate act of fools. Social Security already is under funded and I will hold this administration responsible for the debacle that will follow. Shameful and totolly irresponsible.
    • Harry  •  3 months ago
      Let's be careful what we ask for. We don't want the Republicans and Democrats to work together and get more done. We need them to do less. A lot less. The fed gov need to leave us alone and stick to constitutional responsibilities only.
    • G B  •  3 months ago
      Since when is taking money from social security a tax cut? Will future benefits be reduced? You can bet on it. By stealing money from the SSA trust fund the deficit does not increase so our elected officials can spend more to show us how much they care for us and our vote.
    • Fungus  •  Boston, Massachusetts  •  3 months ago
      Congress moves to raid Social Security Trust Fund.

      There are a zillion other taxes that they can cut, why choose this one?
      • Harry 3 months ago
        to get re-elected of course. but it really doesn't matter.....all the funds get commingled right?
    • bob308  •  3 months ago
      Congress moves forward! LMAO! This Congress has no guts, no guts to do the right thing and that's end tax benefits to US multinationals that export US jobs.
    • robert  •  Corpus Christi, Texas  •  3 months ago
      I vote for no one! Both parties are guilty of adding to our deficit, which is already at 100% of GDP and of defunding Social Security, which is already broke. Bunch of idiots
    • Cursecheck Glitch BITCH!  •  3 months ago
      dont take your eye off the ball here - these filthbags didnt want this last year so jus tunderstand that they dont want it this year either - they are lying to you to get reelected - what you need to to is remember what these sons of bisshes did last year - vote on that - dont be insulted by their strategy to make you think they are on your siede, because after election, their true colors will show again.
    • KIng Ferdinand  •  Harlingen, Texas  •  3 months ago
      I worked all my life and I hate to be taxed heavly to feed and clothes lazy ,no good,stupid want-to-beies, and illigals that refuse to work. Liberals love this so they can spend and spend and spend and give and give and give to these lazy humans. Vote these weak idiot leaders out of office!-----They are liberals----------.
    • Sha Na Na  •  West Chicago, Illinois  •  3 months ago
      Robbing Peter to pay Paul will put us further in debt. This Obama administration is a joke.
    • bob308  •  3 months ago
      It's hard for a Congressman to do the right thing when doing the right thing might effect hjs stock portfolio. Why would he vote to end foreign tax credits to Apple if he's making a fortune off of his Apple stock?
    • Morpheous  •  Fort Worth, Texas  •  3 months ago
      They will pass the 'tax cuts' even though it just further damages the country's financial stability.

      Then the politicians can stut about, crowing that they solved a problem that they themselves created.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.