Mon, May 28, 2012, 8:02 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Congress sends payroll tax cut bill to Obama

    Congress sends Obama legislation renewing payroll tax cut, jobless benefits

    Fantasy Finance

    WASHINGTON (AP) -- Congress on Friday approved legislation renewing a payroll tax cut for 160 million workers and jobless benefits for millions more, backing the main items on President Barack Obama's jobs agenda in a rare burst of Washington bipartisanship.

    The Senate approved the $143 billion measure on a bipartisan 60-36 vote minutes after the House approved it by a sweeping 293-132 vote. Obama is expected to sign it shortly after returning from a West Coast fundraising swing.

    Under the bill, workers would continue to receive a 2 percentage point increase in their paychecks, and people out of work for more than six months would keep jobless benefits averaging about $300 a week, steps that Obama says will help support a fragile recovery from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

    It would also head off a steep cut in reimbursements for physicians who treat Medicare patients.

    The tax cuts, jobless coverage and higher doctors' payments would all continue through 2012.

    Passage of the legislation hands Obama a victory over objections from many Republicans who oppose it but were eager to wipe the issue from the election-year agenda.

    It also clears away a political headache for House Republicans, who blocked a two-month extension of the tax cut and jobless coverage in late December, only to retreat quickly under a buzz saw of opposition from conservative and GOP leaders from around the country.

    With that history, Republicans seemed ready to get the fight behind them and change the subject for the rest of this election year.

    "We're dumb, but we're not stupid," McCain told reporters after he voted. "We did not want to repeat the debacle of last December. It's not that complicated."

    "I think everyone learned a lot from the end-of-the-year stuff," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "Everything doesn't have to be a fight." Republicans, Reid added, have "opposed virtually everything we've tried to do."

    "I think they came to the conclusion that that hasn't worked out very well," Reid said.

    Opposition was stronger in the Senate, where Republicans voted against the measure by a 2-1 margin. Five Democrats and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., opposed the measure, while 14 Republicans, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, backed it.

    In the House, however, a solid majority of Republicans backed the measure despite reservations about its $89 billion impact on the budget deficit over the coming decade.

    And Republicans said the final deal, significantly changed from a tea party-backed measure that passed in December, was the best Republicans could get.

    "We don't control Washington. Democrats still control Washington — they control the Senate, and they control the White House," said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., the top House negotiator on the measure. "A divided government must still govern." Camp cited stricter job search requirements for people receiving unemployment benefits and other reforms to the program as wins for conservatives.

    But many GOP lawmakers were upset that the measure would add to the federal deficit and doubted that it would do much to boost the economy. Another concern was that it cuts a payroll tax that's dedicated to paying Social Security benefits. Deficit spending would make up for the lost revenue, but some lawmakers fear it would chip away at Washington's commitment to the program.

    "I cannot and I will not support legislation that extends the payroll tax holiday without paying for it," said Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga. "This will add $100 billion to the deficit and it will create an even greater shortfall within the Social Security trust fund that already has over $100 billion shortfall just in the last two years."

    And the No. 2 Democrat in the House, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, excoriated the measure for cutting the retirement benefits of new federal hires.

    "The only individuals paying for this bill out of 315 million Americans are the two million civilian workers who work for us, who work for all of us, day after day, week after week, month after month," Hoyer said.

    Extending the 2 percentage point cut in the 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax would save around $80 monthly for someone earning $50,000 a year and give a maximum cut of $2,200 to high-end earners.

    The reduction in the Social Security payroll tax, which is deducted from workers' paychecks, would cost $93 billion through 2022. In a sudden concession this week that made bipartisan agreement possible, House Republicans dropped their demand that the tax cut be paid for with spending reductions.

    In a GOP win, coverage for the long-term unemployed would be cut from the current maximum of 99 weeks to a ceiling of 73 weeks by this fall in states with the worst job markets, with most topping out at 63 weeks.

    Of the $30 billion cost of the extended unemployment benefits, half would be paid for by government sales of parts of the nation's broadcast airwaves, half by requiring federal workers hired after this year to contribute an additional 2.3 percent of their pay for their pensions, up from the current 0.8 percent.

    That increase also would apply to members of Congress, but only to those who begin service as of next January — exempting every current lawmaker.

    The bill also would prevent a 27 percent cut in federal payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients, a reduction that threatened to make it harder for seniors to find physicians.

    That would cost about $18 billion. It would be paid for by trimming Medicare reimbursements to health care providers to cover unpaid medical bills, cutting payments to hospitals that treat large numbers of poor patients and cutting a fund created in Obama's health care overhaul for preventing diseases caused by smoking and obesity.

    A House-approved measure letting states test unemployment benefit applicants for drug testing was pared back, permitting the tests only for people who lost their jobs due to drug use or whose new jobs would require such tests.

    Those seeking unemployment coverage would have to show they are actively seeking work, but another GOP-backed provision forcing them to pursue high school equivalency diplomas was abandoned.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.

     
    • Swb  •  3 months ago
      The destruction of Soc Sec for short term political gain.
      • Bushwhacked 3 months ago
        Yup. The Greece plan.
      • The Great One 3 months ago
        That's why the GOP signed it. But in reality they will just have to raise the top from $106800 to a higher number or take the limit off of it completely.
    • Fed Up With Washington  •  3 months ago
      Social Security is broke and they continue a bill the underfunds it by 2% for another year. Good vote getting ( the average dumbie here has no idea what it does ... they only see the 2% ) but horrible for the country.
      • Howard 3 months ago
        SS is not broke. Do the research.
      • The Great One 3 months ago
        Howard is right! It has always been in the black until last year. What happened was that the Congress has borrowed $1.6 trillion dollars from the fund and doesn't want to put it back. If you remember during the 2008 presidential campaign Gore wanted to get a law passed to keep the funds in SS instead of the general treasury. Of course it was made fun of on shows like Saturday Night Live but Congress needs to get off their lazy rear ends and get it done and then put the money back in they stole. They've been using it like a value added tax from day 1.
    • orofthepress . com  •  3 months ago
      $143 billion subsidy to buy votes. You will pay for it with even more inflation, a bigger deficit that threatens our sovereignty, as well as further defunding of Social Security. Was that extra $40 really worth it?
      • Robert 3 months ago
        The reduction in the Social Security payroll tax, which is deducted from workers' paychecks, would cost $93 billion through 2022
      • Dr. X 3 months ago
        Hey, we're not getting much out of Washington, anyway, in terms of services or representation, so we should at least get some of our money back.
      • Grant Dub 3 months ago
        our money back? its a reduction in tax rate, not money back. should the 1%ers get their money back too? Or should we hold Obama accountable and fire his #$%$ for spending us into a debt crater? Our great grandchildren will still be #$%$ about Obama's policies.........
    • Thomas Jefferson  •  3 months ago
      Just halting off the inevitable collapse till after the election year.
    • Alan  •  Louisville, Kentucky  •  3 months ago
      Unemployement forever!! whatever the cost...ever occur to try re-training peole with new skills???
      • David 3 months ago
        I really don't think skills are the problem with the US economy. I think it's laziness and the desire to live higher than is feasible. Greed and Envy, is sticking it's ugly head out from the Oval Office all the way down to the common laborer. Take the U.A.W for instance. It has priced it's members out of a job.
      • The Great One 3 months ago
        You know what I'm in my 50's now and I even though I'm not collecting unemployment, nobody wants to hire older people. I would have never thought that would occur since I'm a software engineer but they are only looking for young people. I don't know the reasoning but I suspect that they think older people cost too much for health insurance, want time off to be with their families, don't want to work overnights, etc.Even though I have a MS in Comp Sci from a respected university they only want young people.
    • Don  •  Cranbury, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
      Kiss Social Security goodbye for anyone under 40.
      • Robert 3 months ago
        The reduction in the Social Security payroll tax, which is deducted from workers' paychecks, would cost $93 billion through 2022
      • Steve 3 months ago
        Yeah, but this is old news. There's no way SS was going to be there for us, anyway.
      • Impaler 3 months ago
        Robert 2nd time you posted that...
    • Galileo  •  3 months ago
      More "free" candy from Obama and the Congress. Debt may "only" be 100% of GDP, but it is over 500% of the government's annual income, without even counting the unfunded liabilities. The longer this goes on the worse it will end. Elected officials will only act responsibly when we vote responsibly and vote them out.
    • Isabel  •  3 months ago
      We won! What did we win? 100 Billion more on the debt? Yes.
      No word on when the budget will be balanced, only when the debt to GDP with equalize at 75% of GDP. Nominal values such as 27 Trillion total debt in ten years do not matter....
      My only question is: What happens if GDP decreases?
    • Robert  •  Albuquerque, New Mexico  •  3 months ago
      The reduction in the Social Security payroll tax, which is deducted from workers' paychecks, would cost $93 billion through 2022 . I thought this was a 10 month extension of the 2% SS tax cut !! Can you say goodby SS as we know it ???
    • runwith it  •  Denver, Colorado  •  3 months ago
      So it is a social security cut.But is NOT A TAX CUT. Means it is not cutting the biblical waste in the Federal goverment , it is cutting your future. Ahh the socialists in the goverment they get to keep funding their agenda's at you cost.
    • XZ  •  Phoenixville, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
      It doesn't matter - we still need to vote everyone out of congress over the next 3 elections (only 1/3 of senators are up for election each time) and get rid of these career politicians who are totally out of touch with the needs of the majority of Americans
    • burrabbit  •  3 months ago
      The catch phrase coming out of El Dorado DC for 2012 is "Who needs a handout"
      My word to them is "Stop playing roulette" with my money. Bunch of clowns.
    • the anti-liberal  •  3 months ago
      If anyone is wondering why the Republicans agreed to the payroll tax cut it's because they know that most of the electorate is too ignorant to understand why this is a bad idea and that would just end up working against them in the 2012 elections.
    • eyeswideopen  •  3 months ago
      I want to throw up. While u guys keep bickering over Dem and Rep nonsense, the wool keeps being pulled right over your eyes. Both sides work for the same bosses. Get it? The divisiveness keeps us occupied while the obvious just keeps on trucking and they country (i.e. working citizens at all levels) is on a collision course with a speeding train.
    • Anon  •  3 months ago
      You can only kick the can so far down the road before you finally hit a brick wall and the can smacks you back in the face.
    • David  •  3 months ago
      Who decided SS is a tax? I thought that was my retirement supplement. What the hell do both parties think they are doing?
    • Sue M  •  King of Prussia, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
      must be concessions elsewhere, this sounds too easy a give
    • Unaffiliated  •  3 months ago
      Anyone who believes their taxes are not going to double over the next 10 years is in total denial. Worst Congress and Administration in the history of the country.
    • DelJ  •  Dallas, Texas  •  3 months ago
      So congress exempts themselves and their other Federal employee buddies from the rules once again, requiring "future fed employees and future congressmen" to pay more for their outrageous pensions, not the existing ones that make the rules. So the taxpayer gets screwed again. This is as crazy as the new law Congress recently passed making it illegal for Congressmen and Senators to insider trade, even though the law in place before passage of that bill made it clear it was already illegal for everyone. This is a stunning admission that they operated above the law, or illegally for decades. Why is no one going to jail for this? and worse yet, am I the only one that has this figured out?
    • EastCoastPatriot  •  Baltimore, Maryland  •  3 months ago
      Our Congress is as useless as the President! You can kiss Social Security goodbye in ten years. Eventually, the #$%$ politicians that feed on class warfare will try and strip Social Security from whomever they deem as upper class. And your guess is as good as mine as to what "upper class" will mean.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.