Mon, May 28, 2012, 8:17 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Could You Be a 15-Percenter? Decoding Tax Rates

    Could you be a 15-percenter? A look at factors that determines your tax rate

    Fantasy Finance

    NEW YORK (AP) -- Millionaires can be just like everyone else. At least when it comes to paying taxes.

    Mitt Romney released records this week that show he pays a tax rate of about 15 percent of his income. The relatively low figure is raising eyebrows because it's on par with the rate paid by many middle-class households. That's despite the Republican presidential candidate's impressive income of $45 million over the past two years.

    The disparity seems to fly in the face of the basic rule that tax rates move in tandem with wages; the more you earn, the more you pay. So Romney's disclosure may stir suspicions that the system is tilted toward the rich.

    In his State of the Union speech Tuesday night, President Barack Obama focused on the issue by noting that a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households.

    "We need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes," Obama said in a speech that repeatedly touched on the gap between the rich and poor.

    [See also: Frugal Woman Leaves $1.7 Million to Salvation Army]

    On average, the wealthy pay taxes at a much higher rate than the middle-class individuals. But the primary reason that many pay a lower tax rate is that more of their income comes from investments, which is generally taxed at a far lower rate than wages.

    Even if investment income doesn't play a big role in your finances, understanding the basics of how tax rates work can help even the average wage earner save hundreds, if not thousands of dollars a year.

    Here's an overview of what you need to know:

    ___

    TAX RATE BASICS

    Although it's common to grumble about taxes, taxpayers often don't know precisely what percentage of their income goes to the government. So an essential starting point is to look at how tax rates are applied.

    Taxpayers can currently fall into one of six federal tax brackets depending on their taxable income. This amount includes items such as wages and distributions from retirement accounts. The tax rate for each bracket ranges from 10 percent to 35 percent. This is the most basic building block of tax planning because your taxable income can be reduced considerably by various credits, exemptions and deductions.

    Here's the breakdown of how much single filers would pay in federal income taxes depending on their taxable income for 2011:

    1. 10 percent - income up to $8,500

    2. 15 percent - over $8,500 up to $34,500

    3. 25 percent - over $34,500 up to $83,600

    4. 28 percent - over $83,600 up to $174,000

    5. 33 percent - over $174,400 up to $379,150

    6. 35 percent - amount over $379,150

    Keep in mind that these are marginal rates, meaning your income is taxed in tiers. The first $10,000 you earn, for example, is taxed at a lower rate than the next $10,000.

    So let's say you earned $100,000, putting you in the 28 percent tax bracket. This doesn't mean you'd fork over $28,000 in federal income taxes. It means that the amount you earn above a certain threshold is taxed at 28 percent. Your federal income taxes would actually be closer to about 22 percent of your income.

    The current federal rates are set to expire at the end of this year. If Congress doesn't act by then, the rates would revert to levels from before the Bush-era tax cuts, which ranged from 15 percent to 39.6 percent.

    For now, federal income tax rates overall are near historic lows, says Joseph Rosenberg, a research associate at the Tax Policy Center in Washington, D.C. He also said that nearly half of Americans do not pay any federal income taxes as a result of various exemptions given to those with dependents and limited incomes.

    [See also: How to Avoid an IRS Audit]

    Federal income taxes are only a piece of the larger tax picture, however. Payroll taxes, which go toward Social Security and Medicare, eat up another 5.65 percent of wages. That rate returns to 7.65 percent if the payroll tax cut pushed by Obama isn't extended past February.

    State taxes are another factor and can vary widely, with rates ranging from as low as 3.4 percent in Indiana to 11 percent in Hawaii and Oregon, according to H&R Block's Tax Institute. A handful of states, including Alaska and Florida, do not have an income tax.

    THE EXCEPTIONS

    Not all income is taxed at the rates outlined above. A key exception is any money earned from long-term investments, such as stocks, mutual funds and real estate held for at least a year. This income is classified as capital gains and is taxed at a flat 15 percent. That's regardless of whether it's $100 or $1 million.

    "This is why someone who's a millionaire might have an effective tax rate that's lower," said Gil Charney, a tax analyst with H&R Block's Tax Institute. "A higher percentage of their income is going to be from long-term investment income."

    In Romney's case, a chunk of his income in 2010 and 2011 came from Bain Capital, the private equity firm he founded and managed between 1984 and 1999.

    Bain still pays Romney "carried interest," which is a classification of pay for managers of hedge fund and private equity firms. Critics say this type of compensation and should be taxed as salary at ordinary rates. But as it stands, carried interest is considered capital gains because it's profit in excess of what investors paid into the fund, Charney said.

    The tax rate for capital gains wasn't always 15 percent. The rate has moved up and down through the years. In the 1970s, for example, the figure was close to 40 percent. And if Congress doesn't act by the end of the year, the capital gains tax rate will revert back to 20 percent.

    ___

    REDUCING TAXES

    Tax rates are subject to political influences. But there are a few standby strategies taxpayers can use for reducing their tax bill.

    A key tactic is to reduce taxable income; this is why financial planners are such advocates of maximizing contributions to 401(k) accounts. Workers can reduce their taxable income by as much as $17,000 a year. For traditional individual retirement accounts, the maximum contribution is $5,000 a year.

    Most large employers also let workers set aside up to $5,000 of pre-tax wages in a health care flexible spending account. This money can be used for a variety of medical costs, including co-pays, prescription drugs and supplies such as cold packs.

    There are also numerous tax breaks for donations and education and health care costs that you may incur anyway.

    Not everyone will be able to get their tax rate down to 15 percent. Yet there are numerous steps you can take to minimize your tax bill.

    ___

    Follow Candice Choi at www.twitter.com/candicechoi

     
    • Jim  •  2 months ago
      The writer hit the nail on the head. All income needs to be taxed the same, regardless of whether it is investment income. Investments need to be taxed much higher to discourage the investment that generates wealth, since wealth is in and of itself evil. This is the only way we will ever have parity and fairness in this country.
    • just my opinion  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  4 months ago
      I totally agree with CATM - how does someone that paid in 3000 get back 6000 and me at 72 keeps paying in a higher amount and still owes ---
      • mammamoonbeam 4 months ago
        Loopholes, my friend. Loopholes.
      • Kate 4 months ago
        It's not loopholes. It's the earned income tax credit and the child tax credit. You just need to pop a few kids.
      • Dan 4 months ago
        You need to lie PLAIN AND $IMPLE
    • Glenn S  •  Reserve, Louisiana  •  4 months ago
      The tax code we now have is absolutely terrible. A flat consumption tax would be better and then everyone would pay 'their fair share', e.g. gamblers, prostitutes, drug dealers, members in congress or anyone who deals in cash. Of course we could do away with the majority of the Internal Revenue Service which would reduce government expenses while collecting more money. Individuals wouldn't have to have accounting firms and CPA's to figure out our ever changing tax code saving them more money. But that makes too much sense for the 'pinheads' in Washington and they want to maintain their 'intimidation factor' of controlling people. It would have to be a fixed rate and could not be changed unless 2/3 of both the House and Senate approved the increase and then a like reduction would be enacted in government spending.
      • A Yahoo! User 4 months ago
        Couldn't agree more, Glenn. I know of valet parking attendants at a St. Louis downtown hotel that pull in 80K+ per year, all in 1 to 5 dollar cash tips and pay zero in federal/state taxes.
    • R.J.  •  Dallas, Texas  •  4 months ago
      I collected some cans today and bought myself lunch. Awww the simple life.
      • DEA Dave 4 months ago
        me too... and I got a clean bottle of water...
        Now life is complete....!!!
      • DEA Dave 4 months ago
        Wait pill time.. hahhaha
      • Nick 4 months ago
        The last time I seen a guy like you he was also collecting cans and eating out of the garbage at a gas station..
    • wm  •  Houston, Texas  •  4 months ago
      Give me the taxing rules and i will figure out how, under the law, to minimize my taxes. Just like I figured out how to get an education, serve my country, get a job and start my own company.
      For those who think this is wrong to be successful I have no apology. I will continue to set goals for myself and find a way to succeed. For those who want to complain and get something for nothing good luck. For those in Congress who think all people should have equal access to success
      fine but not on give away programs.
      • Patriot47 4 months ago
        I agree wholeheartedly! One fact that is so grossly misunderstood is that Capital Gains SHOULD be taxed at a lower rate that wages. Most investment income is created by spending less of one's wages/salary that they earn---so it's already been taxed at wage rates! Secondly, when an asset is held over 1 year, the value is often increased solely by inflation. This has been particularly true in real estate. Some senior citizens bought their homes in the 40's and 50's for less than $20,000! If sold today, they might receive upwards of $500,000 for that home. In terms of purchasing power, that $20000 has the purchasing power of $188,000. SO if a house sold for $500000, they would have to report a gain of $480000 when the truth, is their gain in purchasing power is only $312000. The capital gain rate is supposed to reflect that recovery of purchasing power AND to compensate for risking their capital in the marketplace (which creates business, jobs, benefits for non-profit organizations and communities).
      • Patriot47 4 months ago
        To clarify further the sale of home above. I purchased my home for $110000 in 1972. I could sell it today for 1,000,000 or a gain of $890,000. The $110000 I invested in 1972 would have a purchasing power in 2011 of $600000 so, in effect, I would really only be gaining (1,000,000 less 600,000) or $400000 on my investment. If the $400000 were taxed at the proposed 30% capital gain tax rate, I would pay (federal only) $120000. BUT, if I sold it today and paid the current cap gain rate of 15%, I would pay (890,000 x 15%) or $133,500. In a case such as this, the 15% capital gain tax rate is fair and results in more tax when taking cost of living into account.
      • John 4 months ago
        A one time sale of your primary residence is not taxed for the first $2 million dumbazz
    • master redfox  •  Hicksville, New York  •  4 months ago
      this article assumes that the average person could afford to take half their income and put it away into things like 401K and health care flexcare programs. Unfortunately most of us have to use most if not all of our take home income to pay essential needs like housing, food, utilities and transportation. So shall we not pay for these so we can put money away. I try to save every chance i get but those items alone the cost keep rising and my wages are not.
      • Lori A 4 months ago
        I would have a far better retirement fund if I didn't have to pay into social security that has been pilfered from my pay and I will probably never get to see a dime of. As of now, it looks like I'll get to retire somewhere around age 90.
      • Time to wake up! 4 months ago
        Lori- The problem with that is that like the post ahead people do not save - they spend it and then what happens at 65???? Quit making excused and save what you can! If you are young a little adds up a lot over a long peoiod!
      • Jacob 4 months ago
        But you have enough to pay for "needed essentials" like a computer, and internet access....
    • Cat M  •  4 months ago
      Whatever. Someone still needs to explain to me how someone with children that paid in $3000 can get back $6000.
    • Rainmaker  •  Charlottesville, Virginia  •  3 months ago
      Since when did tax increases solve any of our debt problems?
    • Jason B  •  4 months ago
      If Warren Buffett's secretary really pays 35%, that would make her income above 379k. That would put her in the "top 1%".
    • DELILA  •  4 months ago
      Why should someone pay more (percentage wise) than someone else? For sake of argument, if we pay 10% of our income, and we only make $1000, then we've paid in $100....if we make $100,000, then we've paid in $10,000...and so on. As our income increases, so does the amount we pay in. But why should Mr. X have to pay 15% of his income while Mr. Z only pays 5% of his?
    • DJ Calli  •  Fairfax, Virginia  •  4 months ago
      We need to focus on the 50% of Americans that pay no taxes before raising them.
    • Lindsey  •  4 months ago
      I know it sucks and seems unfair, but a higher capital gains tax discourages investing, which can have scarier consequences in itself.
    • Dave P  •  Waterbury, Connecticut  •  3 months ago
      I hate hearing that 50% of Americans pay no taxes. We all pay taxes on things. And by the way, I don't pay any income tax at all because I'm a disabled veteran living of of my disability pension from the Army. Can Republicans please stop calling me a moocher.
    • Peggy  •  Liberty, New York  •  4 months ago
      We need to focus on those that get food stamps, help with fuel oil (HEAP) , free medical insurance for their families, bring home 20,000 a year, not including child support, (2 dependents) and get a 10,000 refund, plus own a home, and do not itemize (taxes, insurance, etc) What am I doing wrong? I work full time (30,000 yr) 1 dependent, no food stamps, no child support, no medical insurance, and get 2,000 back, with itemizing?
    • Lemming  •  4 months ago
      Last year, Warren Buffet's secretary bought a 2100 sqft home in Phoenix which includes a pool and putting green. Those nebraska winters can be harsh.
    • Insight  •  4 months ago
      And why should people who pay no income taxes (either state or federal) be eligible for an earned income tax credit? That's a slap to the taxpayers paying their own freight and the burden of those who keep taking and taking. Is this the equality and fairness we keep hearing about?
      The poor keep getting and the taxpayers just keep getting shafted.
    • brattyb  •  4 months ago
      Being someone who is in the middle class, who pays taxes, and is struggling to hang on, I am not upset with those in the top 1% (because they won't pay more), but really #$%$ off at those who don't pay anything!! Or at the least #$%$ off at the government who lets this happen. Nothing like getting in line at the store behind someone with a food stamp card watching my tax dollars at work when I am wondering if I have enough in the bank to cover whats in my cart... Or hearing about how my co worker refuses to take her kids to urgent care because she does not want to wait in line, instead uses the ER because it is quicker, when I asked her how she could afford it she said, oh I'm on state aid... Meanwhile, my family, who pays the 100 bucks for the Dr.s visit (because I can no longer afford health care) sits for 2 hours waiting to see a Dr! And this is "fair" because????????
    • BrianD  •  4 months ago
      If you want to play baseball, emulate a baseball player. If you want to be a scientist, emulate a scientist. If you want to be rich, emulate the rich--invest your money so that you, too, can earn capital gains and decrease your overall tax rate.
    • Pete Divine  •  Delray Beach, Florida  •  3 months ago
      Only one thing needs to happen for us all to pay 15% or even less....how about we get a smaller gov't that has fewer bases, develops fewer weapons, employes fewer people, and taxes us less? How about less is more when it comes to federal, state, and local gov't? Ron Paul for President.
    • Robert  •  Kalamazoo, Michigan  •  3 months ago
      Apparently the tax code is even too complicated for personal finance columnists to explain. The capital gains rate varies with the tax bracket. Someone in the 15% bracket has a capital gains rate of 0%. I would certainly think this would be important in an article explaining tax rates.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.