Mon, May 28, 2012, 10:27 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Deal trims maximum jobless benefits to 73 weeks

As economy improves, Congress scaling back jobless benefits for long-term unemployed

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Millions of Americans will continue to receive long-term unemployment benefits under legislation approved Friday in Congress, but the scope of the program is being scaled back to cover fewer people by the end of the year.

The measure, which also extends a payroll tax cut through the rest of 2012, begins to wind down the program of extended federal jobless benefits that Congress first approved at the height of the recession. The bill reduces the current maximum 99 weeks of benefits to 73 weeks by September. For those in all but about a dozen of the highest unemployment states, benefits will be cut off after 63 weeks.

The benefits are for people out of work more than six months. The program has provided checks to about 18 million out-of-work Americans who exhausted the 26 weeks of state jobless benefits.

Democrats had hoped to keep the maximum number as close as possible to 99 weeks, arguing that the benefits are critical for those struggling to make ends meet and provide a boost to the economy. Republicans wanted to reduce the maximum time span for benefits to 59 weeks, saying too many people don't seriously look for a job until the government checks quit coming.

The bill lets both parties claim victory: Democrats can say they preserved the unemployment program for another year, while Republicans may claim they won major concessions by scaling back the program.

About 43 percent of the nation's nearly 13 million unemployed have been without work for more than six months, double the rate of any other economic downturn since the Great Depression. If Congress had not reached a deal to reauthorize the program, about a million people would have lost benefits next month.

"It's far from perfect, but it seems to be a responsible approach to the current problem of long-term unemployment," said George Wentworth, an attorney with the National Employment Law Project, a worker advocacy group that supports long-term benefits.

It was not immediately clear how many people might lose out on benefits later this year under the new plan. Currently, 22 states are eligible for 93-plus weeks of unemployment insurance; just 18 get the full maximum of 99 weeks. The average unemployed worker receives less than $300 a week in benefits.

Wentworth said the gradual decrease would help cushion the blow for those relying on the benefits.

The plan would extend the current 99-week maximum through May for states with the highest unemployment rates. Benefits would drop to 79 weeks in June and to 73 weeks in September. Unless Congress extends the federal benefits again, people losing their jobs after July 1 will get benefits for only 26 weeks.

"This agreement is a step in the right direction," said James Sherk, a policy analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation. "However, two years of benefits was excessive when passed, and a year-and-a-half of benefits in an improving labor market is still excessive."

The program was already starting to wind down, anyway. Under the current formula, the maximum coverage period would have fallen to 79 weeks in October.

The job market has been steadily improving, and fewer people are filing for the benefits. On Thursday, the Labor Department reported that the number of people seeking unemployment benefits last week was the lowest it's been in four years.

But Heidi Shierholz, a labor economist with the liberal Economic Policy Institute, said it's still too soon to cut back on benefits.

"Even if we continue growing at the current rate, given the depths of the job deficit that we're in, we're not going to be at a place by May where job opportunities are plentiful," she said. "Layoffs are back to pre-recession levels, but hiring is still extremely slow."

The new law will allow states to make benefit applicants take drug tests if they lost their job because they failed a drug test or are applying for a job that requires one. Republicans dropped an effort to let states require all applicants to take a drug test, or require applicants without a high school diplomas to pursue a GED certificate.

 

48 comments

  • JAMESM  •  Meriden, Connecticut  •  3 months ago
    Unemployment benefits NEED a component of decay (each payment being slightly less than the previous) that gradually and gently reminds recipients that these funds are MEANT to provide a temporary bridge to help people get back on their feet
  • daveb  •  Glens Falls, New York  •  3 months ago
    This may help the red ink. Every person I know collecting unemployment checks is working "under the table" as bartenders, odd job home repair, auto mechanics etc. The irony is that these little side jobs take demand from the legit jobs. So the whole thing is self-perpetuating. . Return the UI checks to 26 weeks max and the free loaders will return to the workforce.
    • Mr 3 months ago
      "Every person I know collecting unemployment checks is working "under the table" as bartenders, odd job home repair, auto mechanics etc. The irony"
      The 'irony' is that YOU are empowering these people to commit fraud and boost the deficit. Turn the freeloaders in and stop whining about extended benefits. Get the cheaters out of the system first.
  • Robert  •  Houston, Texas  •  3 months ago
    Expect more of the same, it's an election year, and all of them are campaigning to keep their job vice do what's right for America.
  • Paul  •  Baltimore, Maryland  •  3 months ago
    if the economy is improving why the need to scale back unemployment benefits? No one would need the extended benefits if they found jobs!!! Yes that's it end benefits, drop them from the system, unemployment falls. Brilliant
    • kkf 3 months ago
      sadly, many unemployed are receiving larger checks from unemployment than they can earn with a job.
    • Schort 3 months ago
      Like the $405 vs $1100 I'm getting? I can exist, just not get ahead... I'm good to while it lasts.
    • Da Bears 3 months ago
      People on unemployment are free riding the system. They can obviously live off it but are waiting for wages to go back to a 2007 level ... NOT GONNA HAPPEN
  • Obama's Stash  •  3 months ago
    If the legislation that reduces unemployment from 99 weeks to 73 weeks is a Democrat bill, use the word “trim”. But on a GOP bill that does the same, use the word “slash”.

    - AP handbook for 'journalists'
  • Panda  •  3 months ago
    Republicans wrote and passed the legislation that allowed the rich to make bets on the capital markets which ultimately brought down the stock market and the economy, making wealthy investors trillions of dollars in a short period of time. Now they want to cut benefits to the people they put out of jobs while CEOs are pulling in multi tens of millions annual compensation package for their fine work laying off much of middle America and sending their jobs overseas.
  • beautypageantjudge  •  3 months ago
    get a job,,,,,,,there are jobs, it might not be the one you think you deserve but tough sheeet....
  • Jay  •  Tampa, Florida  •  3 months ago
    consider once again robbing the poor to pay the rich, a mealy difference of 26 weeks might allow someone to eventually find a job, most people arent happy collecting unemployment and would rather be working, that 26 extra weeks might have kept them going just a bit longer to find a job, consider if you are a white collar worker just how difficult it is to find a job like the one you lost;, I havent after almost a year and a half of trying, sending out 600 applications with no luck, the republicans feel that small victory of paring down from 99 to 73 is important, having 24 more weeks to find an almost impossible job opening means the world to me, but politics and generic condemnation of unemployment support, which we contributed to like social security means a lot more, let the republicans gloat while many of us suffer.f What if we took 26 weeks of salary off of them if they were not doing their job, which 90% of America feel they are not.
  • over here in this line  •  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
    so now that 2 million that were terminated will get all kinds of mail to apply for food stamps, rent assistance, and more free from the government.
  • Lane  •  3 months ago
    That's one way to make the unemployment numbers look better.
  • my  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
    It's an election year... there are 47 Million of Food stamps, the Real unemployment rate is closer to 20 percent, half of the houses on my street are under Foreclosure... But you will never hear about these things in thees Bogus news reports... In fact, a "Paid" army of naysayers are posting comments on yahoo these days, making the country look in better shape than it actually is...
    • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
      You're actually trying to claim that posters on these boards at yahoo are cheerleaders for the economy?!? Yeah, okay....this place has got to be one of the most negative message boards I've ever encountered. From my daily readings here, the vast majority of people are all about the doom and gloom - in fact, the "average" post here looks a lot like your post. If anything, I'd be more inclined to bet that there is a paid army of naysayers running around trying to make the country look WORSE than it is.
    • Bruno 3 months ago
      If the economy was so bad then why are houses selling on coast of California and Florida for million of dollars? "f"/ucker
    • Da Bears 3 months ago
      I'm not being paid to call you an idiot right now... Should I be??? Your block may be different than the rest of America.... Deal with it.
  • william  •  3 months ago
    i know people that are not planning on looking for work until their uneplymt. runs-up. they just stay home gaming while i go to work. Grrrrrr....
    • jOHHNY 3 months ago
      That way they have more time to spend posting on Yahoo comments blaming Obama for everything.
    • vote2012 3 months ago
      I notice you dint say we are wrong JOHHNY.
    • Obama the Great 3 months ago
      Unemployment is a service that companies help pay for, you are free to use it.
  • Uncle Scam out of credit!  •  3 months ago
    A teen ager couldn't live off of $8.25 per hour. How is an adult with a mortgage, cars and kids supposed to support themselves? Perhaps getting 10 full time jobs!!!
    • Michael 3 months ago
      Get a skill that's worth more than $8.25/hr.
    • AnotherAmerican 3 months ago
      If you have cars (plural? seriously?) and an $8.25/hr job why on earth do you OWN a house with a mortgage. Sell that thing ASAP and rent if you can't afford the payments. And for the love of god why do people who can't even figure out how to support themselves decide it would be a good idea to have children too? Think a little bit sometimes, please, it won't hurt. Living on $8.25/hr is easy if you find a cheap place to live, have ONE car that you don't buy new, and don't have kids. If your partner lives with you and also has an $8.25/hr job thats $33,000/yr household income and if you can't live on that you SERIOUSLY need to analyze your priorities and expenses.

      Or better yet, as Michael says, get a skill that's worth something.
  • Dasboot  •  Elmhurst, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    So the logic is that you pass a payroll tax extension for those fortunate Americans that are employed, while cutting off benefits to those that have no income at all? And the take-away is that people that don't have jobs are to blame because they are not looking...because of all that jobless benefits cash they are raking in. Nice.
  • Micro Man  •  3 months ago
    Another probem: The fat guy in the center of the picture used to be skinny until he kept getting extensions. Now he is hefty with Cheeto dust on his resume
  • Fleagle1  •  Hillsboro, Oregon  •  3 months ago
    Why is it that no matter how long the benefits are provided, statistics show the largest percentage of people find jobs within 2 weeks of their benefits ending? I remember when the max # of weeks was 13.
  • Looking for work  •  West Palm Beach, Florida  •  3 months ago
    The republicans are wrong. I have been actively looking TWICE a day since last July. I DO NOT wait for UC to end before job hunting. The ones taking these so called studies do not appy to responsible people like me!
  • KANG  •  Pleasanton, California  •  3 months ago
    --- Congressmen should set jobless benefit on the basis of different age's levels, such as 33-week;55-week;77-week;99-week;222-week more according to ages. Due to be the fact that there exists an inside Hidden Age Policy such as about over 50 year-old who are unlikely to get a normal permanent job,for example: Oakland Peralta Community Colleges District of CA.
  • anon  •  Cleveland, Ohio  •  3 months ago
    did you see the picture caption? 'Daniel Thomas DeChynne, center, of Vancouver, holds his resume while waiting in line during a job fair held by Nation Career Fair, in Portland, Ore.' dog-gone Canadians stealin' our jobs! ;)
  • Bob  •  St Paul, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
    It takes me longer to check out than it does shopping.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER