Mon, May 28, 2012, 10:29 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Deep spending cuts pose a new threat to US economy

Deep spending cuts and expiring tax breaks could weigh on economy without toppling it

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
MCO37.360.11
NOC58.50-0.31
BAC7.150.01

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Just as the U.S. economy is making progress despite Europe's turmoil, here come two new threats.

A congressional panel is supposed to agree by Thanksgiving on a deficit-reduction package of at least $1.2 trillion. If it fails, federal spending would automatically be cut by that amount starting in 2013.

Congress may also let emergency unemployment aid and a Social Security tax cut expire at year's end.

Either outcome could slow growth and spook markets.

Analysts are concerned, but most aren't panicking.

Many say the economy and markets will likely muddle through. It's possible that the supercommittee will reach a partial deal that might limit the impact of the automatic cuts in 2013. Congress could also pass legislation next year to ease the scope or timing of the spending cuts.

And investors expect so little from the congressional panel that they're unlikely to overreact whatever it does.

"There's no doomsday scenario in reducing government spending," said David Kelly of JP Morgan Funds.

The 12-member bipartisan panel, or supercommittee, was created in August to defuse a political standoff over raising the federal borrowing limit. If it can't agree on a deficit-reduction plan, automatic spending cuts would hit programs prized by both parties: social services such as Medicare for Democrats, defense for Republicans.

The panel appears to be deadlocked.

Many economists hoped that an extension of the Social Security tax cuts and unemployment benefits would be part of a supercommittee deal. Congress could extend those benefits separately. But it would be under pressure to offset the cost to avoid raising the deficit.

The Social Security tax cut gave most Americans an extra $1,000 to $2,000 this year. Unemployment benefits provide about $300 a week. Most of that money quickly and directly boosts consumer spending, which drives the economy.

By contrast, an expiration of those benefits could cut growth by about three-quarters of a percentage point, economists say. Throw in other cuts, like those passed in the August debt deal, and all told, federal budget policies could subtract 1.7 percentage points from growth in 2012, according to JPMorgan Chase and Moody's Analytics.

Given the tepid economy, such a hit could be damaging.

"It would be very difficult for an economy that's doing well to digest, let alone one that's barely growing at potential," said Ryan Sweet, an economist at Moody's. "That could unwind a lot of the improvement we've seen so far."

The economy grew at an annual rate of 2.5 percent in the July-September quarter. Some analysts fear it could fall below 2 percent next year, especially if the emergency unemployment benefits and Social Security tax cuts aren't renewed.

The U.S. economy faces other threats, too — from persistently high unemployment to Europe's spreading debt crisis, which could hasten a recession.

If the automatic spending cuts take effect, the defense budget could be cut by nearly $500 billion over nine years. Some contractors are nervous.

Wes Bush, CEO of Northrop Grumman, has told analysts that the company is bracing for spending cuts.

"It's certainly going to be a more challenging environment" next year, he said.

Another wild card: Some investors fear that the supercommittee's failure would spark fresh downgrades of U.S. debt. Standard & Poor's downgraded the government's long-term debt in August. That contributed to a stock market plunge. It's possible that a deadlocked supercommittee would lead the two other major rating agencies — Fitch and Moody's — to follow suit.

Yet S&P's downgrade did little to tarnish U.S. debt. Treasury prices rose, and yields fell. Bond investors still saw Treasurys as a super-safe investment. Federal borrowing costs actually declined.

"S&P showed that when a rating agency downgrades the best-known security in the world, it has little impact," Kelly said. The market for U.S. Treasurys is so broad, accessible and transparent that ratings downgrades don't pose much threat, he noted.

Kelly said Wall Street is unlikely to panic given that expectations for the supercommittee "are so low as to be subterranean."

Even so, some traders appear to be positioning for a shock. So-called "defensive" sectors of the stock market, like healthcare companies and utilities, which tend to retain their value in a weak economy, have been outpacing the S&P 500 index as a whole.

In the past month, the economy has shown surprising strength. Reports this week showed that manufacturers are producing more goods and consumers are spending more. The number of people seeking unemployment benefits for the first time is at a seven-month low.

Still, more than once since the recession officially ended more than two years ago, the economy has displayed vigor only to stumble again. High gas and food prices and Japan's earthquake sharply slowed growth in the first half of the year. Congress' debt-ceiling fight sent consumer confidence to recession levels.

Sweet thinks there's a good chance Congress will end up extending the Social Security tax cut. Partly on that assumption, Moody's foresees 2.6 percent growth next year. For this year, analysts generally estimate less than 2 percent growth.

The supercommittee could also agree on less than $1.2 trillion in cuts. Doing so would reduce the automatic spending cuts that would start in 2013.

Other changes could also be made next year. Tax cuts enacted during the Bush administration, and extended in 2010, are set to expire after 2012. Republicans will push to renew them. Extending those tax cuts, though, could require further spending cuts.

"Given we are dealing with a number of different scenarios with wide-ranging outcomes, it seems foolhardy to try and quantify the economic impact at this juncture," economists at RBC Capital Markets said in a note to clients Friday.

Some economists say the automatic spending cuts could actually boost confidence a bit: They would reassure the world that the U.S. government can make progress in shrinking its deficit.

Even so, the supercommittee seems likely to fall short of its goal to help reduce the federal debt load.

And there's more pressure to come.

Priya Misra, an analyst at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, estimates that Congress will need to find $2 trillion more in cuts by August 2013 to prevent another credit downgrade.

 

640 comments

  • A Yahoo! User  •  6 months ago
    So if we do not increase our spending debt we will get a downgrade? Oh I see. Prosperity through indebtedness.
    • mikec 6 months ago
      the loony libs would like you to believe that.
    • Howard Roarke 6 months ago
      Reagan's rising tide lifting all boats, HA! The tide of debt, baby. Reagan turned our nation from a creditor nation into a debtor nation. The truth is out, maybe now you fools can realize the beginning to our current state of madness.
    • Richard 6 months ago
      Debt is relative to income AND expense #$%$ As far as I can see, it is our socialistic financing of the very wealthy that is breaking the system. They gamble, if they win, horah; if they lose, we pay for it. Wars of expansion, tax evasions, and downright handouts to the wealthy. They want us to support the infrastructure that they profit from, us to support their failures, and all the while, the use legal loopholes, to actually get refunds and handouts. The continuing skew of wealth disparity, and downward spiral of wages, is not an accident; and it certainly does point to lower end austerity, but upper end austerity. Oligarchy's never end well. A little return to how capitalism fits into a free market, might stop some of this conservative idiocy. Watching a continually upward skew in income disparity, while screaming socialism, is rather ignorant. We are not headed toward socialism, and we certainly are not practicing capitalism in a free market; what we are headed toward is Oligarchy.
  • We THE People  •  6 months ago
    This is like a train ride where all the passengers know where they are getting off, but the conductor won't let them. You can't tell me these facts have been known for years. Vote out all of them, every one of them!
    • A. M. Deist 6 months ago
      That is what Jesse Ventura said, but don't elect any Republicans or Democrats to replace any that are voted out.
    • Howard Roarke 6 months ago
      Two names for the same party: The Corporation Party.
      Ollama has $1 billion to spend on his re-election. $1 Billion?? Seriously, why would anyone give him that much money? What else can he give his donators? We already have kids being prescribed drugs by the drug industry. The food merchants bundle lard and make people sick to give business to the medical industry. And we continue our military madness through fear-mongers to justify the need for this continual transfer of our money to the military complex.
    • rpexplorer 6 months ago
      aaahh but you can get off - you liquidate and move. You do what corporations do when conditions penalize them to the point where they must either go out of business or re-locate. I would recommend either Canada or Mexico. Mexico's debt is currently about 10% of GDP and its unemployment is around 4.6%. Don't have numbers on Canada but it is similar. No income tax here and corporate rate is 29%.
  • bulldog  •  6 months ago
    What bunk, and misinformation! Spending cuts would not even happen until 2013, not immediately! Why does the Media lie and print stories like this? Is there Agenda to destroy what is left of America?
    • mikec 6 months ago
      The MSM work for obama and the DNC.
    • j 6 months ago
      The MSM is trying to keep the investor in these anemic markets.
    • A Yahoo! User 6 months ago
      the main stream media works for sir evelyn rothschild of the banking family cartel. He owns both Reuters and AP now.
  • ed  •  6 months ago
    Deep spending cuts my A##, the 1,2 trillion is spread over ten years
    • Tall Tom 6 months ago
      The problem with debt is that the more that you borrow the more that you have to pay back by borrowing even more. This is an unsustainable financial model.
    • BIGGUY 6 months ago
      They should make it mandatory that congressmen get their eyes,ears and brains checked on a yearly basis!
    • Howard Roarke 6 months ago
      ...and it doesn't even take effect until 2013. What a joke! Why does anyone vote for these corporate puppets?
  • endless  •  6 months ago
    Let's start by rolling back salaries of House & Senate members, forcing them to pay a higher out of pocket co-pay on all medical services and needs, plus sharply cutting their retirement benefits.
    If government has become too big then let's start cutting right there in Washington DC. I'd bet two bits that the suggested cuts would NEVER happen.They want to cut spending for education, seniors, etc., etc. but they themselves would refuse to throw any of their "benefits" into the pot to save even $1.
    • gene 6 months ago
      A drop in the bucket compared to what is needed.
    • The King 6 months ago
      its a good start
    • The King 6 months ago
      and put term limits for the house and senate members too
  • samark  •  6 months ago
    The USA is running a budget deficit of $1.4 trillion a year. Unless you cut more than $1.4 trilliion or more every year, your debt of $15 trillion will continue to grow. I know $1.2 trillion the super committee is cutting seems like a lot, but it's not even close to enough.
  • Rusty  •  6 months ago
    how can you spend more when you have less
  • A Yahoo! User  •  6 months ago
    slowing the rate of increase is still an increase. Just ask any 4th grade math student.
  • cootiegiver  •  6 months ago
    Don't worry. They aren't going to cut spending. They aren't even going to slow down the growth.
  • JeffV  •  6 months ago
    We are talking about reducing deficit spending by what amounts to 3 days a month staring in 2013. If that's going to collapse the economy we have bigger issues. Why don't we just have Ben crank up the presses and give everyone in America $1 Million. That way everyone would be happy and we would get this slow painful death of the economy over with.
  • GmanIV  •  6 months ago
    who cares anymore. I'm burned out of the stock market, I'm burned out of IDIOT Politicians who wont do the right thing. Look at GREECE now, we WILL be there in a few years, Guaranteed!
  • Sean  •  6 months ago
    How stupid was that SS tax cut, anyway.
    ALL we hear about for years is how SS is "underfunded", then they CUT the tax that funds it. LOL
    I got an idea, pay back the $3.5TRILLION (yes, trillion with a "T") those crooks in Washington "borrowed" from the fund (to buy votes) with other projects.
    THEN tell me how funding looks.
    BOTH GOP and Dems would love to marginalize SS so they don't need to pay back what they owe.
    VOTE THEM ALL OUT.
    Don't leave even one incumbent.
  • Honda Accord Driver  •  6 months ago
    There will be no spending cuts, they will probably extend every one of Bush's tax cuts, extend the Social Security tax cut, and lower the existing tax rates. Even if they don't do anything, the automatic cuts won't go into effect until 2013, and the automatic cuts will only happen if congress doesn't vote to stop them.

    How is this supposed to help the economy OR balance the budget? Congress needs to get a prescription for Viagra, because they are completely impotent.
  • MK23  •  6 months ago
    Deep spending cuts, right ... - and I'm the Pope.
  • Peted  •  6 months ago
    The so-called Super Committee is made up of millionaires and billionaires! So what do they know about cutting expenses: get rid of one yatch or a summer villa? These boobs are incapable of cutting because their money is not on the line and they think that the American Taxpayer is stupid enough to put up with their profligate spending! Should a Conservative get elected to the White House, he or she will cut government to the bone without benefit of a committee!
  • Anonymous  •  6 months ago
    yep, just print and spend more, the #$%$ way of life... double down on spending MORE .. what complete leeching POS #$%$s are.. so lazy, so greedy
  • Mad Taxpayer  •  6 months ago
    Congress and the House need their salaries reduced and make them pay for their own healthcare, that would help the tax payers and help the budget, all they do is argue any way
  • cabinfever  •  6 months ago
    If we dont stop spending now...we will never recover from our debt... it is better to CUT SPENDING BIG NOW and work our way out of this mess!!!
    Obama is dangerous to the future of America... HIS spending wont stop until we get rid of HIM!!!!
  • BOB  •  6 months ago
    "Deep spending cuts" = Fiscal responsibility and shrinking the BLOB of Big Govt. Nanny State.
  • Aggie in CA  •  6 months ago
    New datat shows that 47% of Congress men and women are millionaires.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER