Mon, May 28, 2012, 9:06 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Dividend Payouts Are Climbing After Plunging to a Record Low

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
WFC31.860.05
^GSPC1,317.81995-2.86
SDY54.72-0.15
VIG56.09-0.18
AAPL562.29-3.03

Corporate America may be getting ready to share a bigger chunk of its record profits with investors, who lately have been getting a record-low piece of the pie.

Dividend payouts already are rising and the total dollar amount by S&P 500 companies could reach a record high this year. Standard and Poor's analysts expect the dividend payout for the S&P 500 to surpass the record $247.9 billion paid out in 2008.

Yet, payout ratios-or the percentage of earnings paid out as dividends-are currently at a record low 27 percent. Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC - News)analysts argue in a note that there could be a long-term opportunity in dividend paying stocks. Historically, payout ratios have averaged 53 percent.

"I think there's a change in investor appetite for risk, and that in the last couple of years that has resulted in better performance for dividend paying stocks...to the extent dividends are being paid. There are also plenty of companies choosing to do share buybacks," said Gina Martin Adams, Wells Fargo institutional equities strategist.

Dividends have provided the bulk of return to long-term shareholders for quite a while, and companies are just beginning to catch on to the fact that investors are seeking dividend-paying stocks and will reward them, according to Adams.

While the price return on the S&P 500 (INDEX: ^GSPC - News) since 2001 has been a stagnant 2.3 percent, the total return, including dividends, is 26.4 percent, the Wells Fargo analysts note. S&P 500 dividend payers averaged a price return of 0.6 percent and total return of 3 percent, relative to a negative return for non payers of 5.7 percent.

Whether companies will pay out a whole lot more has yet to be seen.

"I still think it's kind of mixed," said Adams. "To the extent that dividend paying stocks perform better and corporates are beginning to recognize that long-term growth prospects are stable...It's almost the best of all worlds because investors are going to reward them for paying out cash."

She added: "I do think they are getting ready to step up and share more. What's happening now is they are dipping a toe in the water."

Adams said the investor mentality has shifted as sources of yield have dried up in the current record low interest rate environment. Two of the top 10 ETFs with the biggest inflows in 2011 were dividend stock ETFs-SPDR S&P Dividend (NYSEArca: SDY - News) ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation (NYSEArca: VIG - News) ETF.

The hunt for yield-and dividends-is also a very different tactic from that favored by investors in the not-too-distant past.

"In the 1990s, they were cast in a negative tone," Adams said. "Investors sometimes thought dividends were evidence the company didn't have tremendous long-term growth prospects, but it seems now that dividends are highly valued, and it's taking time for companies to recognize that."

Bespoke Investment Group co-founder Paul Hickey said already this year, there seems to be an increase in dividend raises already, as companies become more confident.

"Compared to the last three years, I think we're going to see much more in the way of dividend raises," Hickey said. "There's more clarity out there. There's a general view that the worst is behind us. Most people would think that companies have a little bit more visibility now. With increased visibility, they'll be more likely to part with some of their cash."

Hunting for Yield

There are a variety of strategies to play dividends. Wells Fargo analysts note that one way is through the S&P 500 "artistocrats," or dividend payers with long-term track records of increasing payouts. These stocks returned 6.4 percent beyond the index return over the past three years.

Adams said another way is to look at industries that have been slow to declare payouts but may be ready to change. She notes compared to other sectors-technology, health care and consumer discretionary-have been the stingiest when it comes to dividends.

"Technology and health care are paying more on average than they have in the last 10 years," she said. "They are recognizing the trend that they do have too much cash and aren't deploying it."

Standard and Poor's index analyst Howard Silverblatt said that Cisco's decision to pay a dividend last year for the first time was a major turn for technology companies. It made for the largest dividend initiation ever, with a $1.5 billion annual payout, which it has since raised. There is now speculation that Apple(NASDAQ: AAPL - News) may share some of its giant cash horde with investors.

"In technology and health care, they are holding a lot of the cash overseas becuse of taxation. There is also a poltical concern to this," Adams said.

Another strategy Adams recommends is to look at the highest yielders in the S&P index. There are 13 companies in the S&P 500 with better yields than the average corporate credit yield of companies with similar ratings. (see list below) There are also 227 companies in the S&P 500 that have a higher yield than the 10-year Treasury.

Some companies also choose to do stock buybacks instead. "It's a very short-term impact. Media comes to mind as an industry that focused on share buybacks rather than dividend payments," she said.

She likened corporate buybacks to 'casual dating,' versus the 'long-term commitment' companies make when they pay their investors quarterly dividends.

Dividend Catch Up

The dividend rate, or the payout rate by S&P 500 companies, hit an all-time high, in terms of cash paid out, in June 2008, but it fell sharply by August 2009 as the recession caused companies to clamp down on capital outlays.

It is now up 31.8 percent since then, but still lags the 2008 level by about 2.5 percent, according to Standard and Poor's data.

For all of last year, S&P 500 companies paid out a total $241 billion, versus the $247.9 billion they gave shareholders in 2008.

Standard and Poor's Silverblatt, senior index analyst for Standard and Poor's indexes, expects the total rate paid out by S&P 500 companies to come in at a record this year. "I'm looking for $263 billion by the time this year is over," he said.

Uncertainty about tax law changes, and the pending expiration of the Bush tax cuts, have probably also impacted corporate decisions on payouts. Adams said if the taxation of dividends is raised above the capital gains tax rate, "the dividend theme could die on the vine."

On Monday, President Obama proposed raising the tax on dividends for households making more than $250,000 to a maximum of nearly 40 percent next year, the highest tax rate set to take effect in 2013.

Obama also proposed raising the current 15 percent long-term capital gains tax rate to 20 percent for the wealthy. He had earlier also sought to set a 20 percent tax on dividends.

Who Pays What

Financials were responsible for more than 31 percent of the S&P 500 payouts in 2007, and they provided just 11.8 percent of the payout in 2011.

Consumer staples in 2011 were the biggest contributor, providing 15.5 percent of the total S&P 500 payout, while technology, seen as an underachiever when it comes to dividends, provided a surprising 10.4 percent of the total last year, according to Silverblatt.

The S&P 500 is currently yielding 2.09 percent but if stocks are removed that don't pay dividends, the average yield of the remaining 396 issues averages 2.46 percent, says Silverblatt. He said the historic yield, going back to the 1930s, is 3.76 percent and the average for the last decade was 1.9 percent.

"From 1962 to currently, the S&P dividend yield dividend by the 10-year yield was 43 percent, less than half," Silverblatt said. Now with the 10-year yielding less than 2 percent, the yield is 7 percent higher, he notes.

So far this year, 68 companies in the S&P 500 have announced dividend actions, with 66 increasing their payout rate and two companies initiating dividends, according to Standard and Poor's.

Follow me on twitter @pattidomm and read more of my posts on http://marketinsider.cnbc.com

Questions? Comments? Email us at marketinsider@cnbc.com



More From CNBC
 

22 comments

  • Phyla nodiflora  •  Walnut Creek, California  •  3 months ago
    A few growth companies are better off reinvesting than paying dividends, but 90% of companies that don't pay dividends are just pretending they have something better they can do with profits.
  • the fixer  •  3 months ago
    if a company doe's not pay div don't buy it because if you borrow money you have to pay intrest on it why not them
    • Deputy Dawg 3 months ago
      You Said it... brush your mouth with gramma's LIE soap ...
    • john z 3 months ago
      A lack of a good education results in people always complaining they have no money. Gee, I wonder why ?
    • You said it... 3 months ago
      Dawg: That would be lye soap. But you are correct, my comment was uncalled for, and I will remove.
  • TLMF  •  3 months ago
    Wow, you mean corporate America is trying to make stock ownership more analogous to owning a piece of the underline company and less like a worthless speculation instrument that shares ponzi mechanics? Thanks CNBC. But how come you haven't been elucidating this for the past 20 years?
    • SC 3 months ago
      More like it's what the share holders are looking for.
  • Odd Duck  •  3 months ago
    We need a president who loves America. Anybody but Obama 2012. Chairman Obammie the Commie must go.
    • Randall 3 months ago
      You need to go to a doctor immediately as you have significant brain damage, Solomon. Better yet, go to a proctologist and have your head pulled out....
  • Randall  •  3 months ago
    Of all the financial analysts to give their opinion, CNBC chooses cheap#$%$ Wells Fargo, who lags significantly behind JP Morgan Chase's dividend payout, despite Wells posting record profits for the last TWO years that dwarf all competing banks. Prediction: Wells Fargo doesn't raise their dividend by March 30 to at least .90 per share from the pathetic .48 per share, you will see a mass dumping of Wells stock in excess of 30% of value......I kid you not.
    • Odd Duck 3 months ago
      Randall, you need to learn more about the Obama administration's micro-management of banking before you criticize a bank. Bank dividends have been held down by your Democratic government regulators at work. The government has required banks to increase equity, which they can only do by selling more stock at low prices or limiting dividends. Also the goverment regulators must approve any dividend increases, which they have generally been reluctant to do.
  • xtra  •  3 months ago
    the todays method of preparing to bilk those forced out of saving accounts or bonds or treasuries because of low yields..?
  • SALS  •  San Mateo, California  •  3 months ago
    Investers forgot about devidinds because the market was good and they were making money on stock prices going up. All of that ceased. Cds tanked. CEOs are sucking up profits and leading investors to believe they are worth millions when they aren't worth hundreds. All that has led investors to salute corporations with a middle finger and pull cash out of the market. No cash, no investors,no market.So Now back to the 60s,thru the 90s.
    If you don't get a devidend . Keep the cash or gold in your jeans.
  • alter  •  3 months ago
    It doesn't matter how much taxes dumocraps get from people, they will always spend more than they get, it never ends. Filthy lying scumbags. Look at Oblamer's budget for Christ's sake. Never trust a thieving dumocrap again.
  • Old Bat  •  3 months ago
    Obama is a flaming idiot just like Bernake. As a retired person who has saved all his life, there just aren't any low risk options out there to support a life style. Guess Obummer wants all of us on welfare.
  • IBLucky4U2  •  Miami, Florida  •  3 months ago
    "Technology and health care are paying more on average than they have in the last 10 years," she said. "They are recognizing the trend that they do have too much cash and aren't deploying it."

    They have "too much cash" - Why are they holding it? They should either give it to their shareholders (the point of the article) or invest in their company's and America's futures by hiring more workers and treating workers better.
  • Donald  •  Sioux Falls, South Dakota  •  3 months ago
    The dividend tax rate will only rise for incomes over $ 250,000. It is unfortunate that many folks are haters and racists and distort facts for political reasons. This is good news for investors and the economy.
  • Michael  •  Augusta, Georgia  •  3 months ago
    If Comrade Obama does radically raise the federal income tax on dividends, everyone will only hold high dividend stocks in IRA accounts or self-directed 401K accounts. The media always fails to mention that dividends are paid out of AFTER TAX INCOME, so they are taxed twice, once at the corporate level and then at the individual level.
  • Rob1  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
    Obamanation is trying to increase the tx on that too.

    DUMP OBAMA 2012!!!!
  • John  •  Hickory Hills, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    The dividends went to the same use as the employee pension contributions...
  • I wont your Money  •  3 months ago
    They better get all capital they can because OBAMA will be voted in by the POOR. Then all these morons pouring there money in these pump up stocks will lose it all this go around
  • alter  •  3 months ago
    If Oblamer had his way he will abolish dividends during his 2nd term because he thinks that only rich people can afford stock.
  • Back2Reality  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  3 months ago
    It is more than clear what is going on here. Businesses are scared as hell as to what Obama is going to do to them and the economy. Every democrat policy is anti business and the companies are stocking up on their cash reserves to weather anything he throws at them. That money could be spent on growth and investment if they wern't so scared of the democrats horrible policies.
  • Ouch  •  Big Island, Virginia  •  3 months ago
    GE Yield: 3.60% .......
    Buy
    Buy
    Buy
  • Jack Goldman  •  3 months ago
    1971 was a game changer. Unlimited currency debasement put profits away from yields and toward inflation, stock prices, and debasement. Dow was $700 in real US lawful silver coins in 1963. Dow is $600 today in the same exact lawful silver coins. It's debasement. Get it? The money bubble benefits governments, owners, bankers, brokers. How long can it last?
  • Jack Goldman  •  3 months ago
    If it's sixty below zero and it warms up to fifty below zero it's still cold out. The corporations are keeping all the money. Dow yields 2%. Either the yield has to rise to 6% or the price has to drop to $4,000 Dow to yield 6%. I expect $4,000 Gold, $4,000 Dow, before 2020. I could be wrong but that is exactly what happened in the 1970's. Why not now?
Loading...
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER