Mon, May 28, 2012, 9:58 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    How Education And Training Affect The Economy

    Fantasy Finance

    Why do most workers with college degrees earn so much more than those without? How does a nation's education system relate to its economic performance? Knowing how education and training interact with the economy can help you better understand why some workers, businesses and economies flourish, while others falter.

    See: Keeping Up With Your Continuing Education

    As the labor supply increases, more pressure is placed on the wage rate. If the demand for labor by employers does not keep up with the supply of labor, then the wage rate will be depressed. This is particularly harmful for employees working in industries that have low barriers to entry for new employees, i.e. they do not have high education or training requirements. Industries with higher requirements tend to pay workers higher wages, both because there is a smaller labor supply capable of operating in those industries and because the required education and training carries significant costs.

    The Advantages of Education to a Nation
    Globalization and international trade requires countries and their economies to compete with each other. Economically successful countries will hold competitive and comparative advantages over other economies, though a single country rarely specializes in a particular industry. This means that the country's economy will be made of various industries that will have different advantages and disadvantages in the global marketplace. The education and training of a country's workers is a major factor in determining just how well the country's economy will do.

    The study of the economics of training and education involves an analysis of the economy as a whole, of employers and of workers. Two major concepts that influence the wage rate are training and education. In general, well-trained workers tend to be more productive and earn more money than workers with poorer training.

    Training
    A successful economy has a workforce capable of operating industries at a level where it holds a competitive advantage over the economies of other countries. To achieve this, nations may try incentivizing training through tax breaks and write offs, providing facilities to train workers, or a variety of other means designed to create a more skilled workforce. While it is unlikely that an economy will hold a competitive advantage in all industries, it can focus on a number of industries in which skilled professionals are more readily trained.

    Differences in training levels have been cited as a significant factor that separates rich and poor countries. Although other factors are certainly in play, such as geography and available resources, having better-trained workers creates spillovers and externalities. For example, similar businesses may cluster in the same geographic region because of an availability of skilled workers (e.g. Silicon Valley).

    For Employers
    Employers want workers who are productive and require less management. Employers must consider a number of factors when deciding on whether to pay for employee training.

    • Will the training program increase the productivity of the workers?
    • Will the increase in productivity warrant the cost of paying for all or part of the training program?
    • If the employer pays for training, will the employee leave the company for a competitor after the training program is complete?
    • Will the newly trained worker be able to command a higher wage? Will the worker see an increase in his or her bargaining power?

    While employers should be wary about newly trained workers leaving, many employers require workers to continue with the firm for a certain amount of time in exchange for the company paying for training.

    Businesses may also face employees who are unwilling to accept training. This can happen in industries dominated by unions, since increased job security could make it more difficult to hire trained professionals or fire less-trained employees. However, unions may also negotiate with employers to ensure that its members are better trained and thus more productive, which reduces the likelihood of jobs being shifted overseas.

    For Workers
    Workers increase their earning potential by developing and refining their capabilities. The more they know about a particular job's function or the more they understand a particular industry, the more valuable they will become to an employer. Employees want to learn advanced techniques or new skills in order to vie for a higher wage. Usually, workers can expect their wages to increase at a smaller percentage than the productivity gains by employers. The worker must consider a number of factors when deciding whether to enter a training program:

    • How much extra productivity would he or she expect to gain ?
    • What is the cost of the training program? Will the worker see a wage increase that would warrant the cost of the program?
    • What is the labor market like for a better-trained professional? Is the market significantly saturated with trained labor already?

    Some employers pay for all or a portion of the expense of a program, but this is not always the case. In fact, the worker may lose wages if the program prevents him or her from working.

    For the Economy
    Many countries have placed greater emphasis on developing an education system that can produce workers able to function in new industries, such as those in the fields of technology and science. This is partly because older industries in developed economies were becoming less competitive, and thus were less likely to continue dominating the industrial landscape. In addition, a movement to improve the basic education of the population emerged, with a growing belief that all people had the right to an education.

    When economists speak of "education," the focus is not strictly on workers obtaining college degrees. Education is often broken into specific levels:

    • Primary – referred to as elementary school in the U.S.
    • Secondary – includes middle schools, high schools and preparatory schools
    • Post-secondary – universities, community colleges and vocational schools

    A country's economy becomes more productive as the proportion of educated workers increases, since educated workers are able to more efficiently carry out tasks that require literacy and critical thinking. As stated earlier, better-educated workers tend to be more productive than less educated ones. However, obtaining a higher level of education also carries a cost. A country doesn't have to provide an extensive network of colleges or universities in order to benefit from education, it can provide basic literacy programs and still see economic improvements.

    Countries with a greater portion of their population attending and graduating from schools see faster economic growth than countries with less-educated workers. As a result, many countries provide funding for primary and secondary education in order to improve economic performance. In this sense, education is an investment in human capital, similar to investment in better equipment. According to UNESCO and the United Nations Human Development Programme, the ratio of the number of children of official secondary school age enrolled in school, to the number of children of official secondary school age in the population (referred to as the enrollment ratio), is higher in developed nations than it is in developing ones. This differs from education spending as a percentage of GDP, which does not always correlate strongly with how educated a country's population is. Therefore, a country spending a high proportion of its GDP on education does not necessarily make the country's population more educated.

    For businesses, an employee's intellectual ability can be treated as an asset. This asset can be used to create products and services which can then be sold. The more well-trained workers employed by a firm, the more that firm can theoretically produce. An economy in which employers treat education as an asset in this manner is often referred to as a knowledge-based economy.

    Like any decision, investing in education involves an opportunity cost for the worker. Hours spent in the classroom cannot also be spent working for a wage. Employers, however, pay more wages when the tasks required to complete a job require a higher level of education. Thus, while wage earning might be lowered in the short-term as an opportunity cost to becoming educated, wages will likely be higher in the future, once the training is complete.

    Cobweb Model
    Since training and education take time to complete, shifts in the demand for particular types of employees have different effects in the long and short term. Economists demonstrate this shift using a cobweb model of labor supply and labor demand. In this model, the supply of labor is analyzed over the long term, but the shifts in demand and wages are viewed in the short term as they move toward a long-term equilibrium.


    Figure 1: Short-term shifts in demand and wage rate

    In the short-run, the increase in demand for better-trained workers results in an increase in wages above the equilibrium level (A). Instead of the increase being along the long-run labor supply curve, it is along the more inelastic short-run labor supply curve (L). The short-run curve is more inelastic because there is a limited number of workers that have or are able to immediately train for the new skill set. As more and more workers are trained (B), the supply of labor shifts right (L2).

    Figure 2: New workers affect on wage rate.

    With the increase in the availability of new workers, there is downward pressure on the wage rate, which falls from W2 to W3.

    Figure 3: New wage equilibrium is established

    Because of the falling wage rate, fewer workers are interested in training for the skills demanded by employers. This pushes the wage rate up to W3, although the increase in wages is coming in smaller and smaller increments. This cycle of wage increases and labor increases continues until it has reached equilibrium: the original upward shift in demand meets the long-run supply of labor.

    The Bottom Line
    The knowledge and skills of workers available in the labor supply is a key factor in determining both business and economic growth. Economies with a significant supply of skilled labor, brought on through school education as well as training, are often able to capitalize on this through the development of more value-added industries, such as high-tech manufacturing.

    More From Investopedia

     

    8 comments

    • Dataman  •  3 months ago
      This is a good argument for free education and training. Unfortunately, most non-employer provided job training is done by for-profit schools that are taking money from students and/or the government to train people for jobs that either do not exist or are going out of style. AND, IF the populace is educated and trained, the work force is a powerful force indeed, UNLESS the jobs are shipped to slave labor countries so the owners can be Billionaires instead of millionaires.
      • Dave200042 2 months ago
        Exactly, Dataman...................however, our idiot President and the Social-Communists who trained him and who he appoints to head departments just don't seem to have the intellectual capacity to figure this out and to stay out of the way of the Credit lending institutions who can provide the means of giving the economy a boost.

        When a President attacks business, he functions to decapitate the economy.
      • Dataman 2 months ago
        @Dave200042 - You are full of it. TU for posting.
    • david  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
      too many jobs "require" a college diploma the could be done with a high school diploma. 7-11 managers, truck drivers, etc. saw a help wanted ad for a coffee barista, send your resume. really? you're making coffee, not nitrogylecerine.
      • James 3 months ago
        David: You would be half-right if job descriptions were static; unfortunately, that is not the case. Jobs are constantly changing, to require more computer and related skills, and the total number of jobs is simultaneously decreasing. This is particularly worrisome given the relentless increase in population globally.
    • RejectPartyDogma  •  3 months ago
      A good article. And this is why I find it troubling that so many people are mourning loos of jobs to places like China. One of the things that is (or at least was) one of the strengths of the US and got it where it is, is highly skilled, educated, and motivated people. But now people seem to really want jobs that can be done by any uneducated Chinese villager.

      Aren't we better than that? We didn't get where we by doing jobs that can be done by any uneducated Chinese villager. We got were we are specifically by doing jobs that *CAN'T* be done by any Chinese villager. When something can be done by any uneducated Chinese villager that *should* be a sign that that is not something WE should be spending our time and effort on. We should be working on bigger and better things. If we insist on doing jobs that can be done by any 3rd world country, then we will be no better than any 3rd world country. If we want to stay better than 3rd world countries, then we need to get back to doing things that 3rd world countries CAN'T do and let the 3rd world countries do the things that can be done by 3rd world countries.

      And that's how we got where we are. We "killed" menial, tedious, time consuming jobs with technology so that our people could be freed up to do bigger, better things that made our country a global economic power. If we didn't "kill" those jobs, we would still be tied up doing those jobs and we wouldn't have been able to move on to doing the things that made us a global economic power. It is a proven economic fact that when a new technology "kills" tedious time consuming jobs, it frees those people up doing that job to move on to bigger and better and MORE ECONOMICALLY PRODUCTIVE things. Consider, (somewhat hyperbolically) if everyone has to be a farmer just to have enough food, then no one has the time to go off and invent and build cars, TVs, smartphones, etc. The only way you get those things is by production increasing farm technology so that it takes fewer farmers to have enough food. Some farm jobs are killed, but now those people have time to go off and invent cars, TVs, smartphones, etc. Sometimes jobs have to be killed so that new things can be created. We *should* see China as such an opportunity rather than a loss.

      This is why I am saddened by the focus on "getting those jobs back from China". Why? Why do we want jobs so bad that can be done by any uneducated Chinese villager? Aren't we better than that? And that's where the education thing comes in. If people won't get advanced educations, skills, and training, then I guess the answer is No, no we aren't better than any uneducated villager when _we_ are averse to taking advantage of the educational opportunities available to us and getting educated. Sure, it' not cheap, but things that move individuals and an economy forward rarely are cheap. If it was cheap and easy, then anyone could do it. You don't get ahead in life by doing the things that anyone can do, you get ahead by doing things that others can't do. That's true individually and nationally in the global economy.

      For completeness, having said that, it is also the case that it is also not a good thing when it is made artificially cheaper to have things done by any uneducated villager in China. It is not good when taxation makes it far more costly to have things done by Americans than Chinese villagers. It is not good when China manipulates it's currency so that labor in China is far cheaper in China than if market rates were allowed to prevail. China manipulates it's currency _specifically_ because it knows that making it's labor artificially cheaper on the global market will allow it to siphon off the global economy.
      • RejectPartyDogma 3 months ago
        Simply, our whining about jobs loss to China is not much different than the Luddites of yore. We know the Luddites were wrong economically speaking and such complaints have always proven economically wrong and unfounded.
      • RONALD 3 months ago
        You make good points. There is a problem, however, with what has been happening with so called education reform. We are teaching to tests, teaching kids to pick from a choice of a), b), c), d) ,or e) rather than to have them think thoughtfully about why things work the way they do. This country has been making the educational box smaller and smaller, trying to stuff everyone into that same box, and then blaming teachers when they don't fit. We have lost much of our arts (including industrial arts) and physical activities. This has the adverse effect of taking creativity and free thinking out of education. Besides the basics, school should be about exploring and learning about what interests a student, not about filling a cog in a corporate machine. Creativity and free thinking is what fuels innovation. Without it, our workforce will be no better than that of the uneducated third world.
      • Dataman 3 months ago
        Educated morons. Talk talk talk and miss the point of everything.
    • Turlough  •  Hollis, Oklahoma  •  3 months ago
      Unlocking terraforming should be the utlimate goal.
    • Robert  •  3 months ago
      Now how about how this works in the real world?
      • Dataman 3 months ago
        IF the populace is educated and trained, the work force is a powerful force indeed, UNLESS the jobs are shipped to slave labor countries so the owners can be Billionaires instead of millionaires.
      • James 3 months ago
        Robert: Read and think, and you will have your answer.
      • James 3 months ago
        Dataman: Slave labor countries, as you call them, generally do not have the access to higher education and advanced training, as we do in the US. Let the low-skill, low-wage wage migrate overseas, and let's focus in the high-skill, high wage industries where American ingenuity makes America globally competitive.
    • Triple T  •  Boston, Massachusetts  •  3 months ago
      My Dad went to second grade in Greece. He has been employed in his pizza place for 55 years in America and so will I. I went to college, why would I get a meager job with my degree when I can make almost 3 times the amount in my pizza place? It has nothing to do with education, it all has to do with hard work.
      • Dataman 3 months ago
        So, you were born into a pizza palace and you expect everyone else to be the same?
      • Triple T 3 months ago
        Yep or a similar palace
    • Dave200042  •  Elk Grove, California  •  3 months ago
      Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm........!

      Is this why nearly 3,000,000 recent university degree holders are presently out of work, and the only thing The Obamination has done for them is to put off their need to start making payments on their education debts until they have these higher paying jobs?

      And is this why Obama's administration NEVER mentions in it's unemployment statistics that when those who have given up looking for work are included in the unemployment stats, the rate is really about 18%, rather than his 8.5 % lie?
    • Norm  •  3 months ago
      More funding won't change anything as long as the same people are in charge and smart people won't play the politically corrupt game the way influential people want it.

      Hire smart people with or without degrees. Forget test scores, certifications and phony on-line degrees and allow people with talent to operate in their own way so Americans can begin to learn in ways that are worth learning.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.