Enough sour grapes from @nytjamescobb (auto ed) and a few others to start a winery. Can we just bury hatchet & move on?— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 20, 2013
The tweet was addressed to James G. Cobb, the Automobiles Editor at the NYT. In a four-part response, Cobb was cordial, but indicated he is still annoyed by Musk's aggressive criticism of the John Broder's review. Musk called the article "fake" soon after it was published.
Here's Cobb's guarded reply:
@elonmusk Three-parter: Elon, I admire your vision & respect what you have built. You promised a game-changer & Model S appears to be one.— James G. Cobb (@NYTjamescobb) February 20, 2013
In a blog post published Monday, New York Times Public Editor Margaret Sullivan said the Times' February 8 review of the Tesla Model S was flawed by "not especially" good judgement and imprecise note-taking.
That may have prompted Musk's peace offering:February 18, 2013
Whatever his motivation, Musk is smart to stop fueling the controversy, which started with a genuine shortcoming of electric vehicles: limited range. The longer Musk questions how Broder's review car ran out of power, the more he reminds the media and the public that it did, in fact, run out of power.
Tesla wants people to think about the game-changing, planet-saving nature of the Model S, not the likelihood of the car rolling to a stop in the middle of a winter roadtrip.
More From Business Insider
- CNBC And CNN Give The Tesla S Rave Reviews — But Both Mention The Same Glaring Concern
- NYT Public Editor: Tesla Review Shows Problems With Precision and Judgement
- The New York Times Gushed Over Tesla's Model S In September
- Elon Musk