Mon, May 28, 2012, 10:40 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Employees Get Paid to Exercise, While Some Pay to Sit Out

    Fantasy Finance

    Some insurers and companies are recognizing that preventative health incentives can potentially save lives--and their bottom line.

    There's evidence of continued, if slow, growth in this trend in a recent survey from gym chain Anytime Fitness, which keeps its doors open at odd hours to inspire more workouts. Anytime Fitness members, across its some 1,500 U.S. gyms, received nearly $4 million in health insurance reimbursements for working out 12 or more times per month in 2011. That's up $1 million from 2010, the company's second "Weight of the Union" survey showed.

    [See 10 Workplace Myths, Debunked.]

    "We are seeing an increase by both health insurance providers offering this benefit to employees and employees taking advantage of these programs that pay them to exercise," says Heidi Holiday, national director of Healthy Contributions, a fitness incentive consultant and administration company.

    There's incentive for all sides to shell out a little more upfront and potentially cut treatment costs later. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, working with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, says that without change, some 86 percent of Americans could be overweight or obese by 2030. That means $1 out of every $6 in healthcare costs will be due to heavy Americans.

    New image. In one example, insurer Aetna has rebranded itself as a "health-solutions company," a sign of the industry shift toward balancing prevention and treatment. Part of the rebrand involves more direct-to-consumer marketing, and Aetna-sponsored, employer-run incentives such as discounted gym memberships, according to marketing trade publication Ad Age.

    One insurer is combining the daily deal coupon craze with healthier lifestyle choices. In February, Blue Cross and Blue Shield rolled out its Blue365 program for some 35 million eligible members. The plan offers discounts on services such as Snap Fitness gym memberships, eDiets.com meal delivery, and Reebok running shoes.

    The economic argument is one way to draw more attention to the epidemic. Employment consultancy Towers Watson reports that employers have seen a 36 percent increase in healthcare costs over the past five years.

    [See 8 Danger Signs When You're Job Searching.]

    "High rates of chronic diseases, like diabetes and heart disease, are among the biggest drivers of U.S. healthcare costs and they are harming our nation's productivity," said Jeff Levi, executive director of the Trust for America's Health, commenting in a report called "Healthier Americans for a Healthier Economy." "Workplace wellness and community prevention programs are a win-win way to make a real difference in improving our health and bottom line all at once," he said.

    Some companies are acting independent of their insurance plans. Gyms on company premises and lunchtime meetings for Weight Watchers or other programs are not new, but these are benefits many companies kept up even in a tough economic climate--some because they're beginning to penalize out-of-shape employees through higher insurance premiums.

    Carrot and Stick. Some companies are taking a different avenue. Preventative healthcare choices are required at some firms, and if they're skipped, employees pay up.

    For Cleveland Clinic's 29,000 employees, more than half have enrolled in the company's Healthy Choice plan since 2010, taking advantage of weight management seminars, yoga classes, and more. To draw more participation, the healthcare system, among the top cardiac treatment destinations, is changing the stakes--a potential 21 percent jump in insurance premiums for unhealthy employees.

    [See 10 Ways to Make Any Job Healthier.]

    Employees who sign up for Healthy Choice agree to see a doctor to determine whether they are at a healthy weight and whether they have one or more chronic health conditions, such as asthma, diabetes, obesity, high cholesterol, or high blood pressure; or if they are a smoker. If necessary, individualized goals are set. If the employee is deemed to be at a healthy weight and falls into none of these disease categories, they can avoid the premium hike with participation in Healthy Choice and frequenting a clinic fitness center, or clinic partner Curves, or by joining the clinic's walking program.

    It's hard to find fault with growth in gym and diet-plan benefits coverage (or even, ultimately, with the stick method, given the high-risk national situation). But some critics worry that preventative medicine expense could potentially cannibalize other coverage and care in the short run.

    When it comes to seniors and gym incentives, the debate has intensified after the release of a Brown University study in the New England Journal of Medicine earlier this year.

    Study findings show that covered gym benefits through select options may be helping Medicare draw healthier seniors to its membership pool and thus lower its overall costs.

    [See our list of the 50 Best Careers.]

    Cost-cutting can be a positive development, sure. But critics note that Medicare strictly forbids practices such as denying coverage based on existing conditions. Study writers acknowledged that if every plan offered the fitness benefits, it would no longer be an effective way of selecting for the healthiest members. However, until that day and given the continued incentives to take on more profitable enrollees, insurers may employ other related tactics to cherry-pick desirable enrollees. As healthier participants are corralled in certain plans, the cost burden on enrollees and taxpayers to cover the traditional Medicare format, where participants have greater needs, is higher.

    Twitter: @USNewsMoney



    More From US News & World Report
     

    14 comments

    • RejectPartyDogma  •  3 months ago
      This is a good thing. For too long we have subscribed to the notion, and still do in many aspects, that in "fairness", everyone should pay the same for their healthcare. But we have gradually started to accept the fact that lifestyle _CHOICES_ _DO_ affect the cost of healthcare. And so we have been getting more accepting of the fact that people who make lifestyle _CHOICES_ that drive up health care costs _should_ pay more and those who make lifestyle _CHOICES_ that drive down health care costs _should_ pay less. If your lifestyle _CHOICES_ impact healthcare costs positively or negatively, then it _IS_ fair that what you pay _should_ reflect the impact your _CHOICES_ have.

      The health benefits or risks of lifestyle _CHOICES_ should be sufficient incentive, you would think, you make healthy choices, but apparently it is not. And to the extent that people still _choose_ unhealthy lifestyles, they should be the ones to shoulder the economic cost burden of those _choices_.
      • jim 3 months ago
        people who are morbidly fat or don't wear seatbelts or motorcycle helmets, should be denied healthcare coverage!!!
      • RejectPartyDogma 3 months ago
        Jim - well, no. It shouldn't be denied, it should just be priced accordingly. Insurance, at it's heart, is a very simple mathematical principle - "expected value"*. The price/premium of an insurance policy is simply the "expected value" represented by that person + overhead and profit.

        * - Expected value is the sum of all possible outcomes multiplied by the probability of that outcome happening. So a health insurance policy would "simply" be priced by the cost of all possible ailments times the probability of that person needing to have each of those ailments treated. For example the cost of treating a broken bone times the probability of having a broken bone plus the cost of an appendectomy times the probability of getting appendicitis and so on. The probability of various ailments goes up with various life choices, so the policy simply need be priced in accordance with those elevated probabilities following that "simple" mathematical principle. Done and done.
    • KIONNA  •  3 months ago
      STUPID PEOPLE HAVE JOBS!!!
    • MATT  •  3 months ago
      Like bacteria, humans life line will populate an area til we are over consumed by each other live in our own crap get sick and die.
    • Louie Lou I  •  3 months ago
      I miss America, it use to be such a nice fun place to work, play, smoke, eat and live how you wanted
      • Bill M. 3 months ago
        Agreed
      • kumite 3 months ago
        It was fun for awhile until lung cancer, addiction and other consiquences of bad life choices started to surface.
      • jim 3 months ago
        Lard #$%$ smokers, should have to pay twice the premium as smart thin people!!
    • zxcvzxcv  •  3 months ago
      the company now owns everything you eat / don't eat, the exercise you do / don't do

      since it's bottom line stuff you don't own the choices anymore

      what freedom won't you sell away
    • BRUCE  •  Germantown, Maryland  •  3 months ago
      WE SHOULD ENCOURAGE SMOKING TO SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY.
    • S E  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  3 months ago
      You are free as long as you do what we say. Soon you will have to eat and drink what they tell you or your insurance will be canceled.
      • jim 3 months ago
        And thats a good thing right???
    • Evolved  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
      Longer life span will be the most costly to society. The longer you live the more expensive it will become. I hope these company setup enough money aside to pay for the healthy employees when they retired.
      • Charles 3 months ago
        The company only wants to maximize short term profits, regardless of any long term impact on society. Owners and management can even run the whole thing into a ditch and still come out personally wealthy, due to rigged business bankruptcy laws.
    • DouglasA  •  Concord, California  •  3 months ago
      I wrote a paper in 1975 mentioning that companies should encourage their workers to exercise because of its health benefits. Now that our nation is full of fat people and health costs are out of control somebody is finally understanding the obvious!
    • the truth  •  Baltimore, Maryland  •  3 months ago
      Soda and Fast Food should have a health tax that gets stashed away to pay for the future health care costs that each causes
      • RejectPartyDogma 3 months ago
        Yes, taxes would be ok - it still gives people their freedom to make their own choices, and they have to pay up front for the cost of those choices. What is not acceptable is banning things because they have been deemed "unhealthy". People have a right to choose for themselves what trade offs they wish to make in their own lifestyles - but they should also be held accountable for the costs of those choices and not get a free pass to pass off the cost of those choices to others. For example I find fast food an unhealthy choice and I think the amount of fast food eaten in this country is disgusting - but I want to retain my right to choose if and when I want to eat fast food. It's not government's place to make that choice for me.
    • 50 CAL  •  Amelia, Ohio  •  3 months ago
      The big issue here is personal choice. I am not overweight and attribute that to my genetic makeup and my choices on lifestyle, food and eating habits. Companies may have good intentions, but the road to hell is lined with good intentions. Stong arming me will only make me balk and resist. As long long as I do my job, leave me and my paycheck alone. I put this right up there with snooping on employees e-mail. If you mistrust your overweight emloyees that much let them go, don't attempt to badger them into something they may not want to do.
    • W  •  3 months ago
      How is it acceptable for insurance companies to be such fascist? I can appreciate they need to make money, but they are the ones that help drive up cost by providing a generally unnecessary middle man. All insurance is a scam because they can pretty much drop you whenever and it is time to fight back for freedom.
    • hookedonharley  •  3 months ago
      F(^&K healthy. If you want to be mr or ms aging jock , you go right the heII ahead. I'm in good enough shape to suit me. And if you think you want to pick a fight with me, remember, people my age are not going to get into a fist fight, we're gonna shoot you.
    • Gene  •  3 months ago
      WHY NOT OUTLAW INSURANCE? IT IS GAMBLING. They are gambling you will pay into the system and NOT make a claim. You are gambling that you'll make a claim greater than the amount you paid in premiums.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.