Mon, May 28, 2012, 9:31 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Do Expensive Homes Make for Wealthy Kids?

    Fantasy Finance

    It seems like common sense: Children from wealthier families tend to do better, while children from poorer families have a tougher time climbing the ladder. Today comes one piece of evidence showing exactly how precarious that ladder climb can be for families of modest means.

    A new study from the Pew Charitable Trusts' Economic Mobility Project shows a correlation between the housing boom and education gains for students from low- and middle-income families. For prospective students from families making less than $70,000 per year, an increase in housing value immediately prior to college might mean more educational success. For every $10,000 gain in such a family's home equity, the likelihood of enrolling in college increased by 6 percent. In addition, the housing boom made these students 24 percent more likely to choose their states' four-year public flagship schools and 17 percent less likely to choose community colleges, and also 9 percent more likely to graduate from college.

    [Who Will Struggle in 2012?]

    At a time when ideas of inequality and what it takes to achieve the American dream permeate the national conversation in the U.S., the study suggests the extent to which even a modest change in fortunes can change the course of a student's education.

    "To me the biggest takeaway from this report is the impact that family wealth does have on postsecondary college decisions," says Erin Currier, manager of the Economic Mobility Project.

    In contrast to the low- and middle-income students represented in the study, Currier says, there was no significant correlation between home value and college attendance for families earning $70,000 or more.

    As those postsecondary college decisions can make or break a person's lifetime earning potential, the study suggests the degree to which growing up with above-average means can lead to a lifetime of financial comfort. Conversely, then, barriers to education can effectively also be barriers to economic mobility.

    "For students that start in the bottom fifth of the income ladder, a college degree quadruples their chances of making it to the top. That to me is the most amazing indicator of the power of education to give a family economic security and upward mobility," says currier.

    [Survey: Dems Lose Hope in Obama's Housing Fix.]

    Labor Department data shows that the unemployment rate drops off steeply with increasing levels of education. In November, the jobless rate for people with less than a high school education was 13.2 percent. For high school graduates, it was one third lower, at 8.8 percent, and for workers with bachelor's degrees, it was 4.4 percent--roughly half the national rate.

    Evidence of the link between wealth and education may challenge basic assumptions about what it takes to climb the ladder in America. A Pew survey also shows that Americans believe that three of the four most important factors in whether a person gets ahead economically have to do with personal attitudes and ambition (hard work, personal drive and ambition, and attitudes and values taught by parents).

    Respondents ranked the state of the economy, postsecondary education, and family stability behind these factors.

    Yet when a housing market and job market remain stubbornly in the doldrums--beyond the control of not only average Americans but, it seems, even lawmakers--the study reinforces the idea that even the students tugging hardest on their own bootstraps can come up against insurmountable financial challenges in their educations.

    [What to Look for from the Fed in 2012.]

    As housing values are currently depressed, with no end in sight, the study suggests that the bursting of the housing bubble created--and is still creating--hardship for current potential college students. According to the study, home equity is estimated to have dipped by 54 percent between 2006 and 2010 for homeowners with less than $70,000 in annual income.

    According to Currier, the study has implications for what policymakers can do to promote postsecondary education. To help students have access to college, federal spending doesn't have to be limited to educational initiatives, like Pell grants.

    "The logical policy implications ... to me are creating opportunities for people at the bottom and middle of the income ladder to not have such a financial barrier to college. And that can be a whole range of things," she says, like helping families maintain assets like their homes and create wealth.

    --A Jobs Problem You Haven't Heard About.

    --See the latest political cartoons.

    --See a slide show of 6 ways to fix the housing market.



    More From US News & World Report
     
    • Donna  •  Raleigh, North Carolina  •  5 months ago
      I love the US of A. I love capitalism. I worked hard, saved, invested and never cheated anyone. I'm no genius, just smart enough to live below my means and invest the rest.
      • Wang 5 months ago
        A number of countries are far more capitalist than the U.S. Singapore, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, etc. One hopes the affection you have for America extends beyond the pecuniary. Otherwise you may as well leave for Asia.
      • STEVE 5 months ago
        Japan has very restrictive import laws and gave money to its auto companies at the same time GM and Chrysler received US government loans. Singapore is corrupt. You may be correct about Korea and Taiwan.
      • Taking you to the woodshe ... 5 months ago
        @Steve, you sure make fast and loose unsubstantiated claims. For example. your statement that "Singapore is corrupt." is a flat out lie.

        Why not read, "CORRUPTION IN ASIA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE
        TO SINGAPORE: PATTERNS AND CONSEQUENCES" before making such statements. You can Google it if you like. But propagating nonsense like you do, what does it serve?
    • Jay  •  5 months ago
      People should read The Millionaire next door and Stop Acting Rich by Dr. Thomas J. Stanley. You might be very surprised by what you learn about wealth and income.
      • JGalt 5 months ago
        The millionaire next door is a really eye-opening story, and it changed my life. I would highly recommend it to anyone who wants to learn a thing or two about really easy ways to get ahead in this world.
      • Wang 5 months ago
        Both 'deep' tomes are based upon the premise mere frugality can turn the trick. There's an assumption everyone is middle class and earns at or above the median income. This absolves the 'gummit' and corporations from responsibility for income inequality.
      • JGalt 5 months ago
        There's absolutely no assumption that everyone is in the middle class. In fact, there are numerous case studies / passages in TMND about high-income earners who are profligate spenders, not the prodigious accumulators of wealth that Stanley cites - those that are low, middle and high-end earners.

        I think Stanley gives a fair strata of these three classes and examples of how earners in each of the categories make it or break it all on their own based on their spending and savings habits and their general outlook on money.
    • Roto  •  5 months ago
      Interesting report. Also, we need to get seriously away from the idea that all kids need to go to Ivy League schools (no better than any top twenty school; fact). In fact, we need to get seriously away from Ive League graduates going into bubba business environments that amplifies their current and future earnings, often without merit. All earnings by everyone need to be merit based and not the presumptuous current and future earnings scale earned without cause by many of our current greedy and, coincidentally, Ive League CEO's and executives. American has lost the true meaning of merit!
      • Wang 5 months ago
        '...go to Ivy League schools (no better than any top twenty school; fact)...'

        That's quite a bold statement. Are you honestly suggesting the University of Chicago is as good as Cornell?
    • better  •  Surfside, California  •  5 months ago
      Sounds like Goldman Sachs trying to justify why you buying that now under water house actually had side benefits. #$%$ An expensive house does not result in weatlhy kids, a great upbringing in a wonderful home would be more likely but even that does not generate wealth unless wealth is something other than money and assets
    • Chilo  •  5 months ago
      I'd never own a labrador. Have you ever noticed how many of their owners go blind? Hey same twisted logic.

      Success is based upon work ethic and education. Successful parents teach kids successful habits.
    • Meditech  •  5 months ago
      Here's one for you. Do a study like this but on, kids who have parents who have stayed married, versus single parent children. I think we all know the answer.
      • Esaias 5 months ago
        except dysfunctional families. no kid can blossom in that environment
      • 322 5 months ago
        WHaT FaMILy is NOt DYSfunCTIOnaL?
      • Jasper 5 months ago
        learn to type proper sentences
    • TracyS  •  5 months ago
      I don't believe that college is always the best answer. Millions of people graduating with degrees and NO JOBS and lots of debt. I believe we will see a shift back to trades....you know the things that made our Grandparents successful. I believe it was called HARD WORK!
      • Jonathan P 5 months ago
        We push too many kids into college today when many tradeskills are still needed and pay very well.
      • WorldWideContractor 5 months ago
        Actually the problem is a lot of kids come away with the WRONG degree and these are often in what young people see as Either "Easy" or "The I'm going to do some real good" subjects. The world is full of unemployed MBA's at this time. The world is full of minimally educated Civil Engineers. Whats needed are Electrical,Mechanical, and Software Engineers,Technical Project Managers. Whats needed are LPN's, RN's, and PA's. What we don't need are more Psychology majors (everyone I know is either unemployed or working in a unrelated field). What we don't need are more so called "Green Science Majors" And what we certainly don't need are more Lawyers. But to get the needed degrees our young people actually have to have applied themselves early on, and sadly most were not willing to do so.

        There is one alternative to collage if the person has a good moral compass and above all common sense and honesty. That's Civil Service. But that is also lacking in quantity.
      • A Yahoo! User 5 months ago
        WorldwideContractor - you hit the nail on the head. Most Universities act like a business (private Universities are businesses) by attracting young people and planting the idea that a "degree" will earn you more money. Young people need to do the diligence to find out what degrees are marketable and what career choices will earn them. The fact is, it's difficult to say that you can earn 100K with a liberal arts degree -- not saying it isn't possible, but you can't reasonably expect to make that kind of money based on the market. However, hard science degrees will earn you good money (I have a BSME so I know) and they will always be in demand -- so long as we keep making things in this country.
    • MS  •  5 months ago
      @M

      "And people who do not care for their children are content to see their children run up massive student loans for college"

      What garbage. There are other issues involved such as: Having skin in the game - the kids paying for it helps them to work harder in their studies. Secondly - you cannot borrow for retirement while the kids can borrow for college. Third, the parents can always come in after the child graduates and help to pay down some of the loans, but until then, let the child think that they own the whole thing so they work hard. Let the helping to pay off school be the reward for a job well done.

      Aside from that, your statement tells the readers of this thread how shallow you actually are in that you are projecting it onto others.
    • CliftonT  •  5 months ago
      We had a saying when I was growing up (poor). Poor people have poor ways. It begs the question, why do poor people have poor ways? Are they poor because of thier poor ways? Or do they have poor ways because they are poor? From what I have learned since then the answer to that is yes. They don't know how to deal with money because thier parrents didn't and didn't teach them, and they either didn't see the value in education or didn't think they could afford it. So it perpetuates through the generations in a circle. I managed to break of that mess myself, but I'm the exception, not the rule. I'm far from rich, but I can buy the Velveta shells and cheese without worrying about how I'm going to pay for it now.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  5 months ago
      There's parents that spoil their kids and give them everything on a silver platter when they're adults.... That's in the fancy houses and the not so fancy houses.... Then there are the parents who demand that their kids don't take things for granted when they're adults and they must think and act like they have brains...........
    • usecare  •  5 months ago
      Wow, this is a classic case of confusing correlation with causation. Every statistics student should read this article. Some good research, some not-so-good conclusions.
    • Groover  •  5 months ago
      Jimmy Carter had it right when he said we have become a nation not defined by who we are but by what we have...
    • georges  •  Indianapolis, Indiana  •  5 months ago
      In Russia, the Rich and affluent were exterminated by the Communists. Now only a few years thereafter the rid of Communism, the same famlies have 90% of the countries wealth. Odd but true. Being affluent is about hard work, rise at 500AM quit at 900PM and one will have plenty even in todays economy. Wait for a Govenment handout and you will be poor and you will destroy your family and force them into poverty.
    • Jc  •  5 months ago
      The article basically says that it is harder for kids whose parents make under 70K/year to go to college now because the parents can't borrow against their homes to pay for college. All I have to say is THANK GOD. The price of higher education is rediculous and its about time people took another look at alternatives to over priced colleges and universities and also invigorated some competition among these colleges/univerities rather than blindly listening to these stupid educators tells us that college is the best choice for everyone.
    • larry m  •  Dallas, Texas  •  5 months ago
      Being born poor does not equate to being born stupid The parental encouragement toward the thrill of learning will overcome a serious lack of income.
    • retired4good  •  5 months ago
      Another likely example of confusing correlation with causation. In my own case, growing up in the bottom 10% but completing college and a graduate degree and now in the top 15%, it was my parents as well as many of the parents of that generation that came out of the depression that stressed education regardless of wealth status. The opportunities of education beyond high school for the bottom 10% was limited to them. Now, with the number community colleges, technical schools and 4 year schools available, it is within reach but who tries hard enough? Both my wife and I had to work full time 40 hour a week jobs to afford college and keep the debt low and I see fewer and fewer students willing to do that and further, more and more families in the bottom 20% that give up and don't stress education.
    • Charles  •  5 months ago
      Let's see, I wonder if being born out of wedlock, on welfare, on drugs, on alcohol, being pregnant and unwed, and other similar factors have any bearing on this situation?
    • Elkhan  •  Houston, Texas  •  5 months ago
      low to mid income family home cost in average about $100,000. Every year, excluding the "buble burst" years, it was adding around $3000-$4000 to equity. Given that every $10000 increase the chance of going to college by 6%, it means the actual result from 1 year increase is around 2%. I'd say it is statistically insignificant and just means that 1 in 50 homeowners max out on home equity loan to be able to send the kids to college, while about 12 in 50 decide to upgrade on college they send the kid to. And this is not factoring in possible correlations vs causation. For example, increase in home prices probably means good performing economy with more jobs, higher pays etc.
    • Tool  •  5 months ago
      do dumb people have dumb children? Yes, I saw it on the movie documentary, Idiocracy.
    • Donald  •  5 months ago
      I've moved from lower to middle to upper middle class neighborhoods because of education and drive so I know the landscape. My children now live in a very affluent area. They feel the motivation to succeed and are greatly influenced by their peers and role models. I truly believe they are becoming the best that they can be. I can't help but believe if they lived in a low income area that they would have the same exposure to these forces. It would be harder.

    RATES

    Stay in touch with Yahoo! Finance

      YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.