Mon, May 28, 2012, 11:09 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Fed minutes: Members divided over more bond buys

Fed minutes show members are divided over when or whether to make more bond purchases

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Federal Reserve isn't about to launch another bond-buying program to boost the economy — at least not anytime soon.

While some Fed officials are open to such a move, according to minutes of the Fed's Jan. 24-25 policy-setting meeting, others believe the economy — which has come to life lately — would need to weaken before taking such action.

The debate took place at a meeting in which the Fed decided to hold its benchmark interest rate at record lows until at least late 2014. One Fed official argued that the central bank might need to consider abandoning that plan to keep inflation low.

"The minutes did not show an urgency to pursue further measures, with the general tone seeming to be one of 'wait-and-see'," said Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at MFR, Inc. "So, if the economy loses steam, markets will begin to expect further action."

That seems even less likely now after recent data show the economy has picked up since that meeting.

Employers added 243,000 net jobs in January, the most since spring. That helped lower the unemployment rate for the fifth straight month, to 8.3 percent. Car sales are up, as is consumer borrowing. And U.S. factories reported having their best month of growth in five years.

"Given that the incoming economic data since that meeting has only been more positive ... there is now little chance of the Fed launching another round of large-scale asset purchases at the meetings in either March or April," said Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics.

The minutes, which were released Wednesday, show Fed officials expected only modest economic growth in the coming months with only gradual declines in the unemployment rate.

Members cited several factors that could weaken the recovery and warrant more action from the Fed. Among them: a slowdown in economic activity abroad; U.S. budget cuts; further weakness in the already-depressed housing market; less borrowing by consumers; and increased volatility in financial markets because of Europe's debt crisis.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke told a Senate panel last week that the declining unemployment rate doesn't capture the plight of millions who have stopped looking for work.

His cautious view suggests the Federal Reserve plans to stick with the three-year time line, even if the unemployment rate continues to gradually decline.

At the January meeting, the central bank for the first time released forecasts for where individual Fed officials expected the key interest rate to be in the future. Those forecasts showed that some members foresee super low rates beyond 2014, while six members saw the increases starting in either 2013 or 2014.

The rate forecasts were an effort to provide more explicit clues about the Fed's plans to give financial markets greater assurances that rates will stay low for some time to come.

The forecasts support a broader Fed effort to make its communications with the public more open.

At the January meeting, the Fed for the first time also adopted an official target for inflation. In a statement of longer-term goals, the Fed said annual increases of 2 percent in an inflation gauge tied to consumer spending would satisfy its mandate to keep inflation low.

Setting an inflation target, a goal of Chairman Ben Bernanke, was approved with one official, board member Daniel Tarullo, abstaining. The minutes said Tarullo abstained "because he questioned the ultimate usefulness" of adopting a Fed statement of long-run goals.

Minutes of the December meeting said some members thought such a statement crafted by a committee might cause more confusion than clarity about the Fed's goals.

The Fed's decision to set a goal of keeping rates unchanged until at least late 2014 was approved on a 9-1 vote. The lone dissenter was Jeffrey Lacker, president of the Atlanta Federal Reserve.

Lacker has expressed concerns in speeches that the Fed's policy of keeping interest rates at ultra-low levels for an extended period could raise the risk of high inflation.

According to the minutes, Lacker suggested that to prevent an increase in inflation pressures, the Fed might be forced into a "pre-emptive tightening" of its policies before the late 2014 target.

 
  • Texas  •  San Antonio, Texas  •  3 months ago
    Some of us older folks are trying to live on our savings and social security.
    We're in deep trouble!!!!
    • 1776nation 3 months ago
      Want to know who to blame? Look in the mirror. You older folks put this system in place!
    • devil dog 3 months ago
      the system did well untill deregulation came and banks took advantage of us all with default derivatives
    • Chilly Billy 3 months ago
      In the now famous words of Our Neighborhood Organizer, "you may need to take a pain pill". BTW, 177nation can go straight to he!!. God speed.
  • westerner  •  3 months ago
    Their "core inflation" computation conveniently excludes fuel and food prices, so they can tout a low inflation rate while America gets raped from high oil and commodity prices. They can weaken the dollar, drive up commodity prices so that all the speculators can make a fortune, and drive a stake through the heart of Middle America.
    • Ron 3 months ago
      They know fully well that the riots in Greece are a picture of what will happen here and more. They are so scared that they are willing to rob everyone to prevent this.
    • NoWorries 3 months ago
      "......and drive a stake through the heart of Middle America."

      Not True. Welfare collecting farmers are making out like bandits. Americans farmers all collect some sort of subsidy, regardless of the high commodity prices they're getting.

      Now by middle america if you mean truckers and waitresses .... yeah, they're screwed. But then again they only have themselves to blame for it. Anyone who votes only on the basis of god, gays or guns deserves the clusterfk in progress
    • proposedsolutionsblogspot 3 months ago
      Even without those effects, if the actual inflation RATE is even at zero, the amount of inflation already priced in to everything is bad. The rate is not so important as the magnitude of inflation.

      Consider the differences:

      50% inflation in one year then 0% inflation for 49 years,
      1% inflation for 50 years (barring compounding).

      These are the same at the end of 50 years.

      Consider the example set forth in another post where if all your expenses doubled but your earnings remained constant, a sudden drop in the inflation rate, even to zero does not mean it's somehow now better as the inflation is in the current prices and not going down. This is what deflation is needed for, to undo the inflation but Bernanke knows the wealthy won't like it.
  • montgomery  •  Pensacola, Florida  •  3 months ago
    How the FED keeps inflatiion below its goal: THEY LIE ABOUT IT
    • geezwhiz 3 months ago
      Everything is going up except your salary....
    • montgomery 3 months ago
      To Geezwhiz? Not everything but your salary. The retired, disabled, etc. who were thrifty, did the right thing, and now rely on ZERO INTEREST rates until :all of l914, are really suffering worse than those who at least have SOME salary left. Think SHALOM BERNANKE cares? Hell no.
  • J  •  3 months ago
    Certainly, Fed members must know that inflation is not "low." Are these people so stupid that they believe their own nonsense?
    • outtafavr 3 months ago
      They are "intervening" in every market, including commodities that affect inflation statistics. The whole world is their playing field. When they brag about low inflation, they smile at the fine work they have done. Welcome to the Matrix.
    • Ron 3 months ago
      No, they think WE are so stupid that WE believe their nonsense!
    • Allen 3 months ago
      Apparently they don't buy their own groceries or fuel up their cars. This is another group in Fed Service that are out of touch with reg folks-they have their millions.
  • JF  •  Minneapolis, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
    The only decision here is do they keep the Ponzi scheme going or not.
  • DavidW  •  3 months ago
    Nowhere in the constitution is there a guarantee of huge gains for big g’bmnt insured no risk investments.
  • Noway  •  Bemidji, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
    After $2.3 trillion, you would have to think that (1) - it worked and you shouldn't need any more, or (2) that it didn't work and adding more won't help.
  • John  •  Fresno, California  •  3 months ago
    Inflation low, inflation low? I am a purchasing agent. How stupid do they think we are?
  • Tommy  •  3 months ago
    The booze and bonuses are flowing in Wall Street. Bernanke and the Federal Reserve banksters know who their masters are. And it's not the citizens of the US. Bernanke and the Federal Reserve banksters will keep the party going.
  • RC  •  Santa Barbara, California  •  3 months ago
    Sounds like they are creating the next bubble. Then Bond market bubble.
  • gordon  •  3 months ago
    Bernanke holds back free markets while he supports printing money to keep stocks afloat because that's the only thing he can do to make people feel good. With a financial genius such as this leading the Fed, we're all doomed to poverty.
  • Jim  •  3 months ago
    What a bunch of ignorant FED members we have. They caused this mess with easy money, always pumping credit, consumption and debt. Never, Never promoting savings. In fact they continue to steal from prudent non risk taking savers. They should be strung up with their ponzi zero interest rate scheme.
  • High  •  3 months ago
    But the stock pumping bubble-makers who claim this economy is so good need their heroin else the markets will crash 50% to fair value in this truly masked depression.
  • Marv  •  Spokane, Washington  •  3 months ago
    They are divided on just how much their banker friends should screw us...
  • Jeff Z  •  Washington, District of Columbia  •  3 months ago
    I'll vote for whoever promises to fire Ben the Bankster
  • george  •  3 months ago
    IF BERNANKE DOES A QE3, HE SHOULD BE FIRED ON THE SPOT. HE'S VERY RAPIDLY MAKING US ANOTHER GREECE.
  • donald  •  Memphis, Tennessee  •  3 months ago
    Wow! These guys are deep thinkers."What do we do, I dont know we got plenty of trees just print money and throw it at everything. Maybe something will stick! Im just a ole dog food salesman, Im not as dumb as I thought I was compared to these idiots.
  • 1776nation  •  3 months ago
    Hopefully even though he's out of the race, Governor Perry will still charge Big Ben with treason in Texas.
  • Jason  •  Houston, Texas  •  3 months ago
    Treasury issues bonds, backed by our future incomes, and FED buys said bonds. FED issues currency. Is that correct? If so, what makes the FED creditworthy?
  • Tim  •  San Diego, California  •  3 months ago
    finansturbation is my term for the fed's only actions: printing money (by way of electronically creating credit, etc).

    I would be arrested if I tried photocopying $100 bills and spending them. I guess I'll just have to photocopy nickels for ten cents each like beavis and butthead.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER