Mon, May 28, 2012, 11:16 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

Right-to-work fines put on hold by Ind. high court

Indiana Supreme Court puts right-to-work fines against Democrats on hold as it takes up case

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- The state Supreme Court placed on hold Wednesday all legislative fines against Democrats who boycotted the Indiana House during the right-to-work battle until it rules on whether it's legal for those fines to be deducted from their paychecks.

The court directed in an order signed by Chief Justice Randall Shepard that none of the $1,000-a-day fines levied this year against boycotting Democrats can be collected and none of the fines deducted for last year's five-week boycott can be returned to Democrats despite an order from a Marion County judge.

Majority House Republicans fined most House Democrats $4,000 for their January boycotts that left the House with too few members on several days as they tried to slow action the right-to-work bill that gained final legislative approval last week.

Mark GiaQuinta, a lawyer for the House Democrats, said he was pleased the Supreme Court had decided to take on the case and deny a request by the state attorney general's office to immediately allow deduction of this year's fines to begin.

"The court agreed with us that the denial of this method of collection until the appeal is heard in full does not constitute an emergency," GiaQuinta said.

State Attorney General Greg Zoeller, a Republican, has maintained that handling of the fines isn't a matter for the courts.

"Under the constitutional separation of powers the legislative branch is where the dispute over legislative fines ultimately should be decided, but to redirect it there requires this necessary first step at the Indiana Supreme Court," Zoeller said.

The Supreme Court didn't immediately set any deadlines for legal filings or schedule any hearings in the case.

Last week, Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels signed the right-to-work legislation, making Indiana the 23rd state to ban contracts between companies and labor unions that require all covered workers to pay mandatory representation fees.

 

17 comments

  • Tish  •  Newark, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
    To Bill,Tommy,Capa760,Baddad and TO-Many of the benefits currently enjoyed in non-union "shops" came about because employers did not want employees organizing,which would limit managements ability to treat their workers any way they want(see right to work states).The eight hour day and forty hour week are just two of the reforms attributable to union pressure.Think I'm kidding?Look up and see what working conditions were like 120 years ago!
    • Malaka 3 months ago
      120 years ago is not now. Just because unions were able to get these reforms put in place a century ago doesn't mean that people of today should fund their thuggery. Job place work standards are now enforced by OSHA, not unions. Benefits packages were lobbied for by unions and are now a part of mainstream competition between businesses in hiring a competent labor force. The only thing that unions are good for now is lobbying for over-the-top benefits packages and ridiculous wage rates for common labor and semi-skilled workers that eventually bankrupt the companies that are just trying to keep their heads above water. Want to know why America has lost all of its manufacturing jobs overseas? Look no farther than the unions!
  • Cici Deleon  •  3 months ago
    Thank goodness we have 23 states in favor of American workers and economic growth! Unions have had a stranglehold on the workplace for way too long. Unions had a place back in the 1800's but are no longer a viable addition to the US economy or those looking for employment.
    • Tish 3 months ago
      Dear Cici - I guess you want to party like it's 1880,huh.Just a (small)paycheck with on O.T. or any kind of benefits or protection.
    • Cici Deleon 3 months ago
      I don't know what the national average is but the area I live in has been in the top ten areas so live for income vs expenditure the past 5 yrs running. In an area where a 2500 sf house averages $100,000 and wages begin around $35/hr plus benefits ... and no union dues or state income taxes.
    • Malaka 3 months ago
      Don't bother Cici. Tish doesn't understand the concept that what unions represented for decades is not necessary now. The ONLY thing that unions should be in place for is to provide legal counsel for those who cannot afford it when they get UNFAIRLY fired. All unions do now is protect lazy workers and thieves. Heck a temp worker nearly got thrown off of a building we were working on because some union chump stole his hammer ($55) and put it in his own toolbox. Another temp worker saw it happen and informed the first temp worker. The temp worker that had his hammer stolen demanded that the union thug open his toolbox and the work site supervisor intervened as 6 union goons had the temp worker by his collar on the 6th story open-walled hospital ledge. The worksite supervisor told the temp that even IF his claims were true that part of the union contract stipulated that no toolbox of the union workers was searchable and that he needed to get over it and take better care of his tools. A $55 hammer means a LOT more to a $7/hr laborer than it does to a $35/hr union thief/goon.
  • qtrhorse8  •  Fairfield, Montana  •  3 months ago
    After reading 99% of these comments a quote comes to mind. This from the man considered the father of our Constitution! "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives" So to all who think unions give money to the mob or don't benefit every worker in this country i suggest you actually do some research on the issue, and by research i don't mean talking with people who know less than you do at your local watering hole. You might even try using your computer to do it. That way you might see just why the repubs are so anti union. If you can pay your employees less than management can make more. I might also suggest you start watching C-Span to get your information on just how is doing what and how they are screwing this country and its middle class. You can't make a formed decision on anything if you only get your information from one source, especially a biased source like oh say fox or msnbc!
  • ALLISFAIR  •  Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  •  3 months ago
    40 % of all union members vote conservative, yet 90% of their forced union dues go to liberals, the unions are so involved with organized crime it is pathetic
    • DAVID 3 months ago
      Another myth GOP loves folks like you blind and uninformed.
  • Gary  •  Morton, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    I belonged to a union for the last 35 years that I worked. They have both positive and negative problems. I do believe that for a company to be unionized that there should be at lest a 70% approval of all workers involed.
  • steve g  •  Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin  •  3 months ago
    I left the UAW in 1973 to become a licensed builder ..I have qouted many jobs for union members since.. I have never once had a union member request that I use union tradesmen on their Job.. In fact just the opposite, they could care less weather the sheetrocker, carpenter, painter etc. have any benefits, or a 40 hr week etc,, The standard was to want the job as cheaply as they could get it done.. If you are going to push your Union, you better start hiring union, and buying union made goods. Otherwise don't preach to me about creating the middle class, when all you have done is manage to over price your own wages.
    • Malaka 3 months ago
      Funny that you hav enever been pushed by unions to use union labor. One summer a construction company that I worked for in Kentucky won a contract with 84 Lumber company to build them new steel framed lumber sheds across the mid-west. Whenever we were in "union territory" we were picketed and harassed. St. Louis was the worst one. We actually had union thugs following us around INSIDE of the job site barking at every turn while we were trying to work. The store manager let it happen because he dared not throw them off of the property or lose out on his local sales. Nothing like getting spit on as you drive through the gates just to work.
  • capa760  •  3 months ago
    There are no reasons to have unions now, later or in this recession. Every dime belongs to the earner, as I earned it. There should not be any redistribution of wealth in America, by any President or like follower. You work for what you get, whether it is with one job, two jobs or creating your own business. There are many people, deaf, blind, paralyzed, low IQ and high IQ who have the code of ethics of not being lazy or excused from working and being paid for their efforts. Stealing for a living, will hopefully, end with you being escorted sent into a paid stay at the local penitentary until you learn the rules of humanity.
  • John  •  3 months ago
    Right to work = right to be fired for any reason or none at all
  • baddad  •  Cupertino, California  •  3 months ago
    I hate unions.
    • GRAYWOLF 3 months ago
      YOU ARE A #$%$ HATE UNIONS, THEN HOW ABOUT WHEN YOU BOSS SAYS YOU CAN ONLY TAKE 15 MINUTES FOR LUNCH AND IF YOU COME BACK LATE HE'LL DOCK YOUR PAY, OR HE SAYS THAT YOU HAVE TO DO WELDING WITHOUT PROTECTIVE GLOVES AND APRON. WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO, SUCK IT UP OR WALK OUT THE DOOR? THIS IS JUST THE KIND OF CRAP THAT WENT ON BEFORE UNIONS CAME ON THE SCENE AND WILL GO BACK TO WITHOUT THEM. HATE UNIONS, THEN BE A SLAVE TO THE COMPANY!
    • ALLISFAIR 3 months ago
      graywolf I have been a worker and I have been a manager and I never saw a good hand mistreated and I never mistreated one. Now those that wasn't worth packing a lunch for that is a completely different story
    • Cici Deleon 3 months ago
      Graywolf, the NLRB and OSHA have strict standards that employers must meet that have no bearing on the job being union or non-union. All I can see that a union does is allow workers to do shoddy work without the employer having any recourse to expect an honest days work for an honest days pay. Union workers are like welfare recipients - they want a paycheck for being lazy.
  • boyblue  •  3 months ago
    Union dues should not be supporting the bosses' organized criminal operations, including buying favors in the high places.
  • Greg Brumbaugh  •  Troy, Ohio  •  3 months ago
    If it weren't for unions you would be working with your parents and your children; all for pennies a day.
  • TOMMY  •  Jackson, Mississippi  •  3 months ago
    ditto on hateing unions communist run
  • DAVID  •  3 months ago
    Learned long ago those who critize unions, never belonged to one so propaganda is easy to pass off onto them as facts. but they are not, heres A fact for those who say unions are crooked in all these states the Koch brothers backed these non union bills hmm gee why.
    Union memebers and average American workers have enjoyed A whooping 16% raise in the last 30 years while the Koch bros and the wealthiests 1% have gotten A measley 275% raise in they`re income hmm.
    Keep dreaming the that GOP is out to help you and when you wake and realize your getting screwed enjoy it you asked for it why fight for your own rights you dont deserve them.
  • DAVID  •  3 months ago
    Right to work is no more than shut up and take whatever we give you what A farce unions workers are not rich and I have never met one that is but I have met quite A few employers who would just pay you the lowest wage they can get away with these Republicans have been attacting the unions for over 40 years.
    They claim the American workers are not competive thats A lie, did the price of your Asian car come down? they are not union, how about your washer, and dryer Whirllpool was`nt union and they moved to Mexico same with alot of other companies who moved to China
    where the average pay per year is 5000 dollars.
    But these radical Republicans want us to beleive its the unions that are the problem thats crap and myths vote these creeps out and never listen to them again Arozonia is A right to work state too and have one of the largest unemployment and foreclousre rates in the country and thats A fact.
  • Malaka  •  3 months ago
    Wow... Go Yahoo for pulling this article after only a dozen comments. Get a call from Hoffa or something?
  • Malaka  •  3 months ago
    Like $1000 a day is a fine. The unions that these Deceptocrats are protecting will just throw them a fundraiser at $1000 a head and completely fund their next election runs. The bill they were boycotting wasn't even about collective bargaining rights. It was against union dues forced on workers. Union thuggery is no different now than it was 50 years ago.
  • T.O.  •  Schaumburg, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    Who in their right mind would oppose a law that gives people the right to work? I just don't understand democrats.
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER