Mon, May 28, 2012, 12:56 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed for Memorial Day

GM to add more steel to Volt to protect battery

GM to reinforce Volt to better protect battery; asks owners to return cars to dealers

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
GM22.440.40

DETROIT (AP) -- General Motors is advising Volt owners to return their electric cars to dealers for repairs that will lower the risk of battery fires.

The company hopes that, by adding steel to the plates protecting the batteries, it will ease worries about the car's safety. Three Volt batteries caught fire after government crash tests last year, prompting a federal investigation and sending GM engineers scrambling to find a fix.

Eligible for the free repairs, announced Thursday, are 8,000 Volts on U.S. roads and another 4,400 still for sale. The cars are covered by a "customer satisfaction program" run by GM, which is similar to a safety recall but allows the carmaker to avoid the bad publicity and federal monitoring that come with a recall.

GM and federal safety officials believe last year's fires were caused by coolant leaking from damaged plastic casing around the batteries after side-impact collisions. The coolant caused an electrical short, which sparked battery fires seven days to three weeks after the crashes. No owners have reported fires after crashes.

GM has a huge incentive to fix the problem and protect the Volt's image. Although the car isn't a big seller — it's fallen short of sales goals — it burnishes GM's image as a greener, more innovative carmaker.

The safety stumble could make it even harder for the Chevrolet Volt to compete with rival electric cars such as the Nissan Leaf. To contain the bad publicity after the fires, GM last year offered to buy back Volts from worried owners.

Adding the steel will spread the force of a crash over a larger area, says Mary Barra, GM's product development chief. Tests by GM and the government have shown that the repairs, to start in February, will prevent battery damage and coolant leaks.

"We have made the Volt even safer," says Mark Reuss, GM's North American president.

GM has done crash tests on four reinforced Volts and found that the fix worked. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also has crash-tested a Volt with the added steel.

"The preliminary results of the crash test indicate the remedy proposed by General Motors today should address the issue," the federal safety agency says.

The agency will monitor the crashed car for another week as it continues its investigation.

NHTSA critics have accused the agency of going easy on GM because the government still owns 26.5 percent of the company's shares and the Obama administration has urged more sales of electric cars to end U.S. dependence on foreign oil.

GM nearly ran out of cash and needed a $49.5 billion government bailout to survive bankruptcy protection in 2009. The government took that stake in the company in exchange for the aid.

But Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety, a watchdog group, says he sees no evidence of a government conspiracy, adding that NHTSA frequently lets automakers use safety campaigns when there should be recalls. He blames that on the agency having too few investigators to regulate such a large industry.

NHTSA spokeswoman Lynda Tran declined comment on the criticism.

NHTSA agreed to allow "safety campaigns" instead of recalls in the 1990s under pressure from the auto industry, Ditlow said. There is little difference between the two other than that NHTSA monitors recalls and makes sure more owners take their cars to dealers to have the repairs made, he says.

"Safety campaigns are a kinder, gentler form of a recall," he says. "It's trying to put a good name on a safety recall."

GM sold 7,671 Volts last year, falling short of its goal of 10,000. Its main competitor, Nissan's Leaf, sold 9,674. The Volt had its best month ever in December with 1,529 sales, but a GM executive conceded this week that the battery fires may have affected sales.

"There has been some uncertainty in the market," says Alan Batey, vice president of GM's Chevrolet division. "We do believe that uncertainty will go away."

News of the fix helped GM stock. Shares rose $1.02, or nearly 5 percent, to close at $22.17.

The Volt has a T-shaped, 400 pound (181 kilogram) battery pack that can power the car for about 35 miles (56 kilometers). After that, a small gasoline generator kicks in to run the electric motor. The car has a base price of about $40,000.

NHTSA began studying the Volt batteries after a test car caught fire last June. The fire broke out three weeks after a side-impact test.

At first, GM blamed NHTSA for the June fire, saying it should have drained the battery to prevent any fires after the test. But the company quickly retreated and said it never told NHTSA to drain the battery. GM executives also said there was no formal procedure in place to drain batteries after crashes involving owners.

NHTSA opened an investigation into the Volt's safety in November following that fire and two others that occurred after tests.

Now the company sends out a team to drain the batteries after being notified of a crash by its OnStar safety system.

Publicity about the fires touched off a massive effort by GM engineers to find the cause and fix the problems quickly. In December, GM CEO Dan Akerson said the company would buy back Volts from any owner who wasn't satisfied. Earlier, the company offered free loaner cars to Volt owners if they were concerned about safety.

So far, about 250 of the owners have asked for a loaner or a buyback.

Last month Akerson said GM wanted to fix the problem quickly to help its customers — and to help electric cars in general. "It's better to get it right now," he said.

Once parts for the repairs are available, GM plans to contact all Volt owners and advise them to set up an appointment for the work to be done. Reuss said the repairs should take two to three hours.

The company also will add steel in all North American Volts and European Opel Amperas produced in the future at a Detroit factory.

 
  • CW  •  4 months ago
    Story doesn't ring true; Leaking coolant caused the shorting? And the fix is more steel? If the battery is drained of fluid, does the car burst into flames? If so, then the seperator membrane used is flawed within the battery or the remaining electrolyte becomes funky (i.e. breaks down) and dendrites grow that cause the shorting. Sounds like adding steel is a low-cost fix for a high-cost engineering problem. This error is going to keep on showing up, I suppose.
    • John 4 months ago
      The article left out the part of how the nimrods at NHTSA stored the cars upside down for three weeks before the fire started. And what a blaze to behold. A lithium metal fire is hot enough to melt the car and even Jesus can't put it out.
    • ChristianStacey 4 months ago
      It's a hit piece on electric cars. You can tell by the responses here at Yahoo. It worked. They'll never tell you about the Telsa Motors electric cars that get 300MPG and go 0-60 in 3.7 seconds... Admit that you haven't heard of Nikola Tesla...
    • CW 4 months ago
      ShopXLV: You are wrong; everyone had heard of Tesla (Nik and motors.) 300 mpg is phoney; obviosly you don;t understand basic math and/or physics. Did you mean 30 mpg? If so, then you are much closer and I applogize. What a joke when the EPA came out and stated that the new GM volt will get 96,000,000 mpg equiv. (yes, I exagerated!) HAH HAHAAH HAH!!!! And Tesla gets only 300 mpg!! HAHHAH HAHAHHAHA You wrong, stupid, or added a zero by mistake, which still makes you wrong.
  • Mike Pa  •  4 months ago
    AP at its finest. The company didn't need $49.5 billion to survive bankruptcy. It would have gone bankrupt just the same and the taxpayer wouldn't have watched billions get vaporized. And it would have come out just the same except the unions wouldn't have ended up as a huge shareholder. the whole sales pitch for the bailout was that it would keep them from going bankrupt, which AP would like to pretend was not the sales pitch. Complete failure and not some saving maneuver.
    • anonymous 4 months ago
      Well said Mike
    • Tim Arnold 4 months ago
      another washington sucess story
    • Carl 4 months ago
      O-blah-blah isn't speaking to loudly now is he?
  • JGalt  •  4 months ago
    I have a mint '72 Pinto up on eBay if anyone is interested. Happy Bidding!
    • apeakay 4 months ago
      I'd buy it in a minute if I were in the market. I had a '74 with a 4 cylinder and 4 speed stick, and it was wonderful. All cars are risky to different degrees. The Pinto was a small car, and small cars tend to have more horrific accidents, especially back then when there were a lot more 2 and 3 ton behemoths on the road. It would be great if Ford came out with a new model, with technology that's currently available.
  • Ken  •  4 months ago
    And to think the Government promoted these UNSAFE vehicles with $7,000 tax subsidies.

    Now they try to convince us the Government should be in the Consumer Protection business....
    • meynpw 4 months ago
      There is no Consumer Protection, soon the rich will be the only ones driving and the rest of will be walking or bicyling to work
    • BWa 4 months ago
      Hey #$%$ the Volt is still far safer than a gasoline guzzling combustion engine which a simple match could cause your entire car to explode!
    • Allan V 4 months ago
      It is the same government that you talk about that found this weakness during testing. Taxpayer money at work...
      The Volt just happens to be one of the first car to benefit from this new type of battery with higher performance. GM just paid the price for being a pioneer and pave the road for others.
  • Brad  •  Dallas, Texas  •  4 months ago
    Let's poor more government money into it! Costs $300,000 to make it, sell it for $15,000, with a goverment loan that has a 90% default rate. Yeah Obamanomics, yeah Solindra! So Happy that Obama and Pelosi can stay at $10,000 a day villas while you and I balace our checkbook each morning hoping to have enough money to pay the electric bill and buy some groceries. And while you are at it, go ahead and raise the taxes so we can have even less. Nancy needs some new leather seats on her jet.

    Hope and Change, how is that working out for you?
    • ted 4 months ago
      Any person who votes for the Kenyan needs his head examined!
  • David G  •  4 months ago
    "a 'customer satisfaction program' run by GM, which is similar to a safety recall but allows the carmaker to avoid the bad publicity and federal monitoring that come with a recall."

    Customers are satisfied by being denied the normal protections given to car buyers? Why wouldn't EVERY recall be done under these terms to avoid bad publicity and federal monitoring? Is this even legal, or are they relying on the government to selectively not enforce the law?
  • anonymous  •  4 months ago
    I will never forgive GM for what they pulled on American Taxpayers when they took bail out money before declaring bankruptcy. They clearly knew at that time with their current business model there was ABSOLUTELY NO WAY they could operate and make a profit!! EVERY EXECUTIVE IN GM knew this to be a fact, but they still took our money anyway rather than face the music and do the inevitable. Had they had any moral or ethical fiber at that time, they would have stated these facts, declared bankruptcy and been done with it. They chose to take the money anyway. I will never under any circumstance buy another GM product for that reason.
  • Ken  •  4 months ago
    "GM has a huge incentive to fix the problem and protect the Volt's image."

    The image the Volt has is that it is a piece of carp. Hardly worth protecting. End the experiment, admit you failed, stop the government subsidy and move on.
  • Charles  •  Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  •  4 months ago
    Yeah right. GM will kill the electric vehicle industry just as it did the diesel motor introduction into automobiles in the 1980's.It will kill the nascent electric vehicle industry with shoddy and unreliable and unsafe volts.Really,I'm not shocked at all.LOL.
  • MikeB  •  4 months ago
    The so-called Leaders of this Country baffle me with their "solutions" to problems ..... It always seems to end with "average joe" paying more for something ..... THAT always seems to be the end result ...... Washington , or Corporate America , never seem to save us money ..... just give us another little somethin' to pay for ...... bleedin' us dry , one nickel at a time
  • Rick  •  4 months ago
    More steel= more weight= less mileage. Let us stop fooling ourselves. Internal combustion is King!
  • Eyes open  •  Springfield, Missouri  •  4 months ago
    Geez - won't anyone understand that an electric car is not an economically viable mode of transportation. The only way for an electric car to be competitive with a gasoline car is for the life of the batteries to increase by 300%, the cost of the batteries to decrease by 67%, or the cost of gasoline to increase by 300%. Until that happens electric cars are merely a political statement. Note that the gas mileage of a Prius - when new is 50mpg, but after 2 years the batteries have deteriorated so rapidly that it gets only 30mpg - About the same as a comparable gasoline car without the $10,000 battery.
  • HoustonOpinion  •  Houston, Texas  •  4 months ago
    A good quick move by GM ... hopefully the Auto Industry does not resort to denials as they often did in the past!!
  • Gre-Gre  •  4 months ago
    Falling "short" of sales goals? How? It couldn't be the bargain basement suggested retail price of $40,000. Could it.
  • Hello  •  4 months ago
    The problem with the Volt is the cooling of the battery which is done with liquid. No matter how much steel you put around the battery, if the liquid cooling breaks down, you have a problem. This is a band-aid fix. The Nissan Leaf uses air-cooling and a different battery layout that does not present the same issues at the Volt. Not that I would buy either of these vehicles.
  • JR  •  4 months ago
    The Obama regime, when it was the predominant owner of GM (aka Government Motors) made a big stink and initiated investigations of Toyota (a competiter of GMs) when Toyota was having safety issues (stuck accelerator), issues which as it turns out were unfounded. Yet now GM (Government Motors) masks it's own safety issues by promoting a "customer satisfaction program" vs being forced by the gov't to issue a full blown safety recall for the batteries catching fire. The Obama regime still owns about 26% of GM, no wonder they're treating the GM safety issue much differently than they did Toyota's....
  • Moose  •  Sunnyvale, California  •  4 months ago
    Those who fell for government motors propaganda and bought these worthless vehicles, are paying the price of their poor decisions.
  • Jacksdad  •  4 months ago
    You could add unicorn tears and fairy dust and those silly things still won't sell. They've sold around a thousand to the public, Obama used your tax dollars to buy the rest. That is after he used your tax dollars to build that ridiculous contraption.
  • Timothy  •  Elmhurst, Illinois  •  4 months ago
    Omama Motors will give each owner a fire extinguisher.
  • GARY  •  4 months ago
    They will need to add some diamonds along with the extra steel in order to entice somebody to buy this lemon of a green car. 35% of the number built have yet to be sold. Of the ones sold, how many were bought by the government? 400 pounds of batteries to take you 35 miles??? What am I missing here? With my wonderful gasoline powered vehicle I charge up in 3 minutes at any one of thousands of gasoline stations conveniently located all over the place, and I go 350 miles with only 12 pounds of battery. What a great invention!
 
Recent Quotes
Symbol Price Change % Chg 
Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
 
Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.

Trading Center

Yahoo! Finance on Facebook

  YAHOO! FINANCE ON TWITTER